:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民中小學校務發展計畫之研究
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:許添明 引用關係許瑞津
作者(外文):Sheu, Tian-mingSheu, Jui-chin
出版日期:2001
卷期:47
頁次:頁155-184
主題關鍵詞:校務發展計畫學校本位經營教育改革School development planSchool-based managementEducation reform
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
世界各國已逐漸重視校務發展計畫的擬訂與實施,不僅因為該計畫提供學校成員作計畫、決定、與資源分配的依據,還可以有效監督與評量學校整體表現與改善計畫的實施成效,而且是上級政府績效責任架構的基礎與政策銜接的媒介,因此,各國政府無不卯足全力,協助國民中小學擬訂周詳可行的校務發展計畫。我國雖自民國77年起,也開始要求學校擬訂校務發展計畫,但可惜都停留在經費的審核與撥款的依據,而不在整體改善學校的運作與績效。 有鑑於我國過去經驗,再參酌英國與澳洲維多利亞省校務發展計畫的內容與做法,本論文試圖以文獻分析與焦點團體訪談方式,找出適合我國的校務發展計畫內容與作法。我們的結論是理想的校務發展計畫應包含五項主要內容:1.學校願景;2.學校現況;3.學校目標;4.優先行動方案;5.行為規範,而這些內容都必須以有效提升學生學習為核心;本論文也建議校務發計畫應納入責任績效制度架構,才不致形同具文。
Many countries around the world have gradually recognized the importance of designing a school development plan (SDP), not only as a basis to provide a structure for planning, decision-making and resource allocation, but also to allow school communities to systematically monitor and assess school performance and to plan for improvement. On top of that, it provides the basic structure to underpin the accountability procedures of the Bureau of Education (BOE), and act as a conduit for policies and procedures specified by the BOE. Therefore, many governments spend much effort to assist schools in outlining a detailed SDP. In Taiwan, although we have started to require SDP from all schools since 1988, the plans have only been used as a basis for grants allocation, and not as a means to improve the efficiency and accountability of our schools on the whole. Our research aims to integrate the theory with the practice, and the experiences of other countries and our own, so that we can find a better way to design a SDP suitable for use in Taiwan’s elementary and secondary schools. Through literature review and focus group interview, it as found that an ideal SDP for Taiwan’s elementary and secondary schools should include the following 5 parts: 1.school vision, 2.school profile, 3. school goals, 4.action plan, and 5.codes of conduct. Members of the focus group also recommend that a SDP be part of the accountability framework.
期刊論文
1.陳倬民(1988)。改進臺灣省經費概算之構想。師友,255,3-5。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.許添明(2000)。學校本位經營的成與敗。沒有紀錄。30-39。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王崑源(1996)。國民教育經費補助政策之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐素如、Stewart, David W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(1999)。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gurr, D.(1999)。From supervision to quality assurance: The case of the state of Victoria(Australia)。Paris:UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning。  new window
3.Kotter, John P.、周旭華(2000)。變革--哈佛商業評論。臺北:天下遠見出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部秘書室(1996)。第六次中華民國教育年鑑。臺北:教育部秘書室。  延伸查詢new window
5.四一○教育改造聯盟(1996)。民間教育改造藍圖:朝向社會正義的結構性變革。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Vaughn, Sharon、Schumm, Jeanne Shay、Sinagub, Jane M.、王文科、王智弘(1999)。焦點團體訪談:教育與心理學適用。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.施能傑(1994)。中央國教經費補助款應用之研究。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉慶中、高敬文(1996)。國民小學日常決策流程及資源分配的研究-以高屏地區為例。國民小學日常決策流程及資源分配的研究-以高屏地區為例。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.臺灣省政府教育廳(1991)。革新校務行政、落實教育績效。革新校務行政、落實教育績效。南投縣南投市。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育部(1992)。教育部補助地方國民教育經費作業要點研習宣導會手冊。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
12.Department of Education, Victoria(1997)。Developing a school charter。Developing a school charter。Melbourne, Australia。  new window
13.Department of Education, Victoria(1997)。An accountability framework。An accountability framework。Melbourne, Australia。  new window
14.Rogers, R.(1994)。How to write a school development plan。How to write a school development plan。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.Department for Education and Employment(1999)。Investors in people and school self-improvement,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top