:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生親子溝通、同儕互動與性行為關係之研究
書刊名:臺灣性學學刊
作者:柯澍馨 引用關係李文懿
作者(外文):Ko, Shu-hsinLee, Wen-yi
出版日期:2001
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁13-32
主題關鍵詞:大學生親子溝通同儕互動性行為Parent-child communicationPeer interactionSexual behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究旨在探討親子溝通、同儕互動與大學生性行為之關係。研究對象立意取樣方式,選取臺北市公立大學二所、私立大學四所,包括九個科系及四個年級為施測對象,共計411位,其中男生95位、女生316位。研究工具包括以下四個部份:「個人背景資料調查表」、「親子溝通量表」、「同儕互動量表」「性行為量表」,施測所得之資料採SPSS for Windows統計套裝軟體,以次數分配、平均數、t考驗、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析、薛費事後比較、皮爾森積差相關及多元逐步回歸等統計方式進行資料分析。研究所得之結果如下:1.大學生與父母親之「親子溝通」狀況,傾向於「中立」狀況。2.在「同儕互動」狀況上,大學生與同儕間之互動,傾向於互動佳的狀況。3.在性行為方面,大學生之性行為有逐年增加的趨勢。此外,有性行為經驗者約佔受試者的四分之一,其中男生有性行為經驗的比率大於女生,且幾乎皆曾採取避孕措施。4.大學生之性行為不會因為親子溝通狀況的不同而有所影響。5.大學生之性行為不會因為同儕互動狀況的不同而有所影響。6.大學生之性行為會因「性別」的不同而有差異在在,其中,男生之性行為較女生為開放,且兩者間有顯著差異存在。7.大學生之性行為,會因「年級」不同而有差異存在,其中以大四最為開放,其次依序是大三、大一、大二。根據上述研究之結果,建議正值男女交往時期的大學生,應加強建立正確的交友態度,尊重異性與自己,學校與家庭均應正視性教育的重要,配合子女成長階段給予適當的性教育,並強化親子的溝通,以雙向的「開放式溝通」取代單向的「問題式溝通」,以期使大學生有更負責的性行為。
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship among parent-child communication, peer interaction and college students’ sexual behavior. The population was students form two national and four private universities in Taipei, including freshman, sophomores, juniors and seniors form nine department. There were 95 males and 316 females, 411 students total. Research instruments used in the study contained four parts below; Individual Background Data Investigation Scale, parent-chile Communication Scale, peer Interaction Scale and Sexual behaviors Scale, SPSS for windows was used to analyze the data by ways of FrequenDistritaion. Mean & Standard Devibuion, T-test, One-way ANOVA. Chi-square and Pearson Product Correlation. The results of the study were: (1) Parent-child communication between college students and their parents was inclined to be neutral. (2) Peer-interaction between college studerts and their peers had a positive tendency. (3) Their sexual behavior tended toward increasing year by year. Besides, one-fourth of students among samples had experienced sexual behavior and the number of female studeuts was greater than of male studeuts. (4) college studeuts’ sexcual behanior was not influenced by parent-child communication. (5) Peer interaction would not influence their sexual behavior. (6) College students’ sexual behaviors were different with the distinction of universities. The students in the private universities were opener than those in the nation universities. (7) Their sexual behavior was distinct owing to the difference of sex. Males in the universities were opener than females, and there existed an significant difference. (8) Their sexual behavior differed from each other because of the distinction of grades in university. Seniors were the openest of all, and then juniors, sophomores and freshmen. According to the results of the study mentioned above, it suggested that college students in love should establish an accurate attitude of making friends, respecting the opposite sex and themselves. Both schools and families should emphasized one the importance of sexuality education, offer a series of proper sexuality education children of different developmental stages, and enhance parent-child communication with two-way open communication instead of one-way negative one.
期刊論文
1.Mueller, K. E.、Powers, W. G.(1990)。Parent-Child Sexual Discussion: Perceived Communicator Style and Subsequent Behavior。Adolescence,25(98),469-482。  new window
2.Fox, G. L.、Inazu, J. K.(1980)。Patterns and outcomes of mother-daughter communication about sexuality。Journal of Social Issues,36(1),7-29。  new window
3.晏涵文、林燕卿、張利中(19980900)。青少年婚前性行為及其趨勢之探討。臺灣性學學刊,4(2),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王鴻經(1979)。台北市五專五年級學生對婚前性行為的態度及經驗之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫毓英(1986)。親子互動模式與青少年社會關係之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊煥烘(1980)。我國大學生性知識、態度、行為之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳秀惠(1996)。親子溝通、父母管教方式與青少年性知識、性態度及性行為之研究(碩士論文)。文化大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.王瑞琪(1992)。臺北市高職三年級學生避孕行為及其相關因素探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.人間雜誌(1991)。大學生同居行爲。  延伸查詢new window
2.台大青年社(1980)。台大人的性觀念。  延伸查詢new window
3.李國錄(1990)。家庭生活型態、傳播行爲、同儕圃體與兒童消費行爲關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.晏涵文(1994)。近十年來台灣地區「性教育」研究回顧(1977-1993)。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭明雪(1988)。台北市五專五年級學生約會行爲之調査研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃貴美等(1992)。大學生性知識及態度之研究,台北市:中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊昭慧(1991)。台北市某女子學院三專夜間部學生從事婚前性行爲之意向研究--理性行爲論之驗證。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊麗英(1993)。青少年性行相關因素之研究。  延伸查詢new window
9.Barnes HL & Olson DH(1985)。Parent-adolescent communication and circumplex model。  new window
10.Brock LJ & Jennings GH(1993)。Sexuality education: What dughters in their 30s with their mothers had told them。  new window
11.Cernada GP, Chang MC, Lin TH & Cernada CC(1986)。Implications for adolescent Sex education in Taiwan。  new window
12.Deacon RE & Firebaugh FM(1988)。Family resource management--principles and applications,NEW YORK:Allyn & Bacon Inc。  new window
13.Hobart CW(1972)。Peer interaction and social organization.,NEW YORK:John Wiley。  new window
14.Olson CF & Woroby J(1984)。Perceived mother-daughter relations in a pregnant and nonpregnant adolescent sample。  new window
15.Robinson IE, et al(1991)。Change in sexual behavior and attitudes of college students。  new window
16.Sander GF & Mullis RL(1988)。Family influences on sexual attitudes and knowledge as re ported by college students。  new window
17.Schulz B & Bohrnstedt GW(1977)。Explaining pre marital sexual intercourse among college students: a causal model。  new window
18.Stinnett N, Sander G, DeFrain J & Parkhust A(1982)。A nationwide study of family who perceive themselves as strong。  new window
19.Teevan JJ(1972)。Reference groups and premarital sexual behavior。  new window
20.Weinstein M & Thornton M(1989)。Mother0child relations and adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE