:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣北部地區國小中年級學童分數概念之研究
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類
作者:游政雄呂玉琴 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Cheng-shungLeu, Yuh-chyn
出版日期:2002
卷期:15
頁次:頁37+39-67
主題關鍵詞:等分簡單分數分數單位量分數等量等值分數Equal-sharingSimple fractionUnitEqual-quantityEquivalence fraction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:49
     本研究在探討臺灣北部地區國小中年級學童分數概念的等分、簡單分數、分數單位量、分數等量及等值分數等子概念的表現。研究方法採筆測及一對一半結構式面談進行。 研究結果顯示學童運用整數知識來處理分數問題並將分數的分子、分母視為獨立的二個數,普遍存在在各試題的表現上;學童解判斷是否等分問題時,只注意到被分割的塊數,而忽略分割後的每一塊是否相等;學童對於單位量、內容物的單位詞出現混淆的情形;中年級學童較習慣用全部內容物當單位量;學童在面對餘量再分問題時會自行增加或減少內容物,使其數量可以整數個分配;許多學童在比較分數大小時,直接將分子和分母分開來進行比較,而不足將分數視為一個量來比較。同時研究也顯示中年級學童一半和二分之一的連結並不穩固。 根據研究結果,本研究對國小分數教材和教學、評量及未來研究方向提出一些建議。
     The study aims to investigate middle-grader's understanding of sub-concepts in fraction, including equal-sharing, simple fraction, unit, equal-quantity and equivalence fraction in northern Taiwan. The research methods are paper-and-pencil test and one-to-one semi-structural interviews. The result shows that the students applied their knowledge of integer to deal with the problems of fraction and they regarded numerator and denominator as separate numbers. This phenomenon was evident in students' problem solving strategies. When judging the problems of equal-sharing, they only noticed the number of parts but neglected to judge if each part was equal. Students were confused by the unit terms of unit and content. Middle-graders tended to take the whole content as unit. When the remainder needed to be divided, students added or deducted the content to make the content divisible by integer. Many students compared numerator and denominator separately instead of comparing them as an amount when comparing fractions. Besides, the research also found that the connection between half and one half was not held very solidly by middle-graders. This research will bring up some suggestions for the material, teaching, evaluation and future research on fraction teaching in elementary school.
期刊論文
1.林福來、黃敏晃、呂玉琴(1996)。分數啟蒙的學習與教學之發展性研究。科學教育學刊(中華民國科學教育學會),4(2),161-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Post, T. R.、Behr, M. J.、Wachsmuth, I.、Lesh, R.(1984)。Order and Equivalence of rational number: A Clinical Teaching experiment。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,15(5),323-341。  new window
3.呂玉琴(19910800)。國小學生的分數概念:1/2 VS. 2/4。國民教育,31(11/12),10-15。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂玉琴(19910800)。影響分數二分之一概念的因素: 個案分析。國民教育,31(11/12),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
5.林碧珍(19901200)。從圖形表徵與符號表徵之間的轉換探討國小學生的分數概念。新竹師院學報,4,295-347。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hiebert, J.、Tonnessen, L. H.(1978)。Development of the fraction concept in two physical contexts: An exploratory investigation。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,9(5),374-378。  new window
7.Pothier, Y.、Sawada, D.(1983)。Partitioning: The emergence of rational number ideas in young children。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,14(4),307-317。  new window
8.Armstrong, B. E.、Larson, C. N.(1995)。Student's use of part-whole and direct comparison strategies for comparing partitioned rectangles。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(1),2-19。  new window
9.Behr, M. J.、Wachsmuth, I.、Post, T. R.(1988)。Construct a sum: A measure of children's understanding of fraction size。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,16(2),120-131。  new window
10.Clark, F. B.、Kamii, C.(1995)。Equivalent Fractions: Their Difficulty and Educational Implications。Journal of Mathematical Behavior,14,365-378。  new window
會議論文
1.Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.(2001)。From psychometric to didactical assessment models in mathematics education。沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Bergeron, M. J.、Herscovics, H.(1987)。Unit Fractions of a Continuous Whole。沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Figueras, O.、Filloy, E.、Volderuoros, M.(1988)。Some Difficulties Which Obscure the Appropriation of the Fraction Concept。The 11th Conference of International Group for PME。Montreal:Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education。366-374。  new window
4.Figueras, O.(1989)。Two Different View of Fraction: Fractionating and Operating。The 13th Conference of International Group for PME,268-275。  new window
研究報告
1.楊壬孝(1988)。國中小學生分數概念的發展 (計畫編號:NSC-77-0111-S-003-09A)。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊壬孝(1988)。國中小學生分數概念的發展。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊壬孝(1989)。國中小學生分數概念的發展。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳靜姿(1997)。國小四年級兒童等值分數瞭解之初探(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Columba, H. L.(1989)。Equivalent Fraction Concepts: A Teaching Experiment(博士論文)。University of Louisville。  new window
3.黃馨緯(1995)。國小高年級學童分數數線表示法瞭解之研究(-),臺中。  延伸查詢new window
4.李曉莉(1998)。國小二年級兒童分數概念之研究(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.彭海燕(1998)。國小學童等值分數概念瞭解之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳宏毅(2002)。臺灣北部地區國小低年級分數概念之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.、Szeminska, A.(1960)。The Child's Conception of geometry。London:New York:Rouledge:W. W. Norton & COPMany:Basic book。  new window
2.Behr, M. J.、Lesh, R.、Post, T.、Silver, E. A.(1983)。Rational number concepts。Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes。New York, NY。  new window
3.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第一冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第一冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第二冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第二冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第三冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第三冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第四冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第四冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第五冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第五冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第六冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第六冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第七冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第七冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第八冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第八冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第九冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第九冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第十冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第十冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.康軒文教事業(1999)。國民小學數學教學指引,第十一冊。國民小學數學教學指引,第十一冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE