:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論公民投票三階段:各國實施經驗分析
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:曹金增
作者(外文):Tsao, Chin-tseng
出版日期:2003
卷期:42:4
頁次:頁129-159
主題關鍵詞:人民投票公民複決公民創制直接民主PlebisciteReferendumInitiativeDirect democracy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:31
     本主要是從各國實施公民投票的經驗,分析並申論公民投票實行三階段之發展。 (1)第一階段:尋求主權獨立之公民投票時期(Plebiscite),如五十年代之立、非洲各國、一九九一年至九九三年前蘇聯共和國、一九九九年東帝汶。(2)第二階段:尋求反代議民主之公民複決時期(Referendum),如一九六二年的法國、一九九三年的義大利、一九八八年的智利、一九九三年的巴西等。(3)第三階段:追求人民直接立法之公民創制時期(Initiative),如一九八○年以後的瑞士、美國各州。 另外,有兩個例外:魁北克和臺灣,其公民投票發展模式有別於一般國家,但筆者相信魁北克和臺灣最終仍必須求主權獨立之公民投票,才能真正解決其內部代議政治之問題。
     The purpose of this article is to analyze and explain the practice of the three phased referendums from the experiences implemented among all countries. (1)First phase: the plebiscite period of independence or sovereignty-for example, the countries in Asia and Africa in 1950s, the former soviet Republics during 1991-1993, and East Timor in 1999. (2)Second phase: the Referendum period against the representative democratic system-for instance, Face in 1962, Italy in 1993 Chile in 1988, and Brazil in 1933. (3)Third phase: the initiative period for direct legislation, such as Switzerland and the American States after 1980s. There are two exceptions, Quebec and Taiwan, because their referendum developmental models are different from other countries. Therefore, the author believes if Quebec and Taiwan want to solve the representative democratic system problem thoroughly, they have to try to gain independence or initiate a Sovereignty Plebiscite.
期刊論文
1.唐玉禮(1996)。「公民投票」的理論與實際-以我國核四論戰為例。中山人文社會科學期刊,4(3),47-80。  延伸查詢new window
2.畢英賢(19910500)。蘇聯的公民投票與新聯邦制。問題與研究,30(5),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淳文(19960400)。法國公民投票制度簡述。憲政時代,21(4),85-109。  延伸查詢new window
4.張台麟(19940900)。義大利政黨政治之發展及其特性。問題與研究,33(9),65-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林岩哲(19921200)。加拿大的修憲公民複決。問題與研究,31(12),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Smith, Thomas B.(1986)。Referendum Politics in Asia。Asian Survey,26(7),793-814。  new window
會議論文
1.蘇永欽(2001)。創制複決與諮詢性公投:從民主理論與憲法角度探討。臺北。1-24。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳棟傑(1995)。公民投票法制之憲法許容性暨法政策分析:以全國性公民投票為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schmidt, David D.(1989)。Citizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:Temple University Press。  new window
2.Butler, D.、Ranney, A.(1980)。Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory。Washington, D.C.:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy。  new window
3.林勁(1993)。「臺獨」研究論集。海峽學術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Butler, D.、Ranney, A.(1994)。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, D.C.:The AEI Press。  new window
5.Gallagher, Michael、Uleri, Pier Vincenzo(1996)。The Referendum Experience in Europe。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
6.Held, David(1987)。Models of Democracy。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
7.Magleby, David B.(1984)。Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
8.Kobach, Kris W.(1993)。The Referendum: Direct Democracy In Switzerland。Dartmouth Publishing Company。  new window
9.謝復生、張台麟、韋洪武(1997)。公民投票(創制複決)制度比較研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1997)。新編世界各國憲法大全,第二冊。新編世界各國憲法大全,第二冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.Commission on the Conduct of Referendums(1996)。Report of the Commission on the Conduct of Referendums。Report of the Commission on the Conduct of Referendums。London, UK。  new window
12.Farley, L. T.(1986)。Plebiscites and Sovereignty: The Crisis of Political Illegitimacy。London, UK:Westview Press。  new window
13.Creery, T.(1966)。What French Canada Wants。Politics: Canada。Toronto, Canada。  new window
14.Oakley, Lisa、Neale, Thomas H.(1995)。Citizen Initiative Proposals Appearing on State Ballots, 1976-1992。Washington, DC:Congressional Research Service。  new window
15.Pridham, Geoffrey(1988)。Political Party and Coalitional Behaviour in Italy。Political Party and Coalitional Behaviour in Italy。New York, NY。  new window
16.Suksi, Markku(1993)。Bringing the People: a Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum。Bringing the People: a Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum。Boston, MA。  new window
17.Zimmerman, Joseph F.(1999)。The Initiative: Citizen Law-making。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
圖書論文
1.葉俊榮(1999)。公民投票在台灣的實踐。公民投票與台灣前途。臺北:前衛出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE