臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：甘逸驊
作者(外文)：Kan, Yi-hua
出版日期：2003
卷期：42:5
頁次：頁1-23
主題關鍵詞：北大西洋公約組織；北約；後冷戰時期；新現實主義；新自由制度主義；社會建構主義；North atlantic treaty organisation；NATO；Post-cold war era；Neorealism；Neoliberal institutionalism；Social constructivism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:52
　　　　　冷戰期間兩大集團對峙的國際格局於一九八○年代未期解體，使得維持西方世界安全的北大西洋公約組織面對外在環境的巨大變遷，北約的存廢遂成為後冷戰時期國際政策的學者與執行者辯論的焦點。國際關係學者紛紛從的必要、聯盟功能的維持或轉換、組織的運作與維護，以及相關角度對於北約產生的價值與認同等面向。 新現實主義者首先就北約的續存提出非觀的預期，認為一個軍事聯盟賴以生存的外部威脅消失後，這個聯盟也將隨之解體；但之新自由制度主義者提供不同的預測，豐富了後冷戰時期國際關係學者從理理論層次討論北約存廢的論證。除了這兩個主流理論外，在一九九○年才逐漸發展成為一個成熟理論的社會建構主義在北學存廢的辯論中著墨較少，但其理論基礎對於國際體系與國家的互動提供不同的解釋工具，在北約的生存與未來的發展方面將有更大的發揮空間。 本文將勾勒這三個主要國際關係理理分別以權力、利益與知識為基礎的中心假設，並著重在理論對於國際建制或軍事聯盟的產生、維繫與哀亡的研究，接著探究這三個國際關係理論對於後冷戰時期北約存廢問題的預測與解釋，再就各理論對北學的討論歸結出理論的適用性與缺失。
　　　　　As a result of collapse of bipolarity of international system in the late 1980s, dramatic changes provide an opportunity for academics and practitioners in international relations to review questions concerning the future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Scholars have predicted or interpreted the developments of a post-cold war NATO, such as the survival or dissolution of the alliance, change and continuation of organisation functions, its practice and maintenance, and altering identities and interests of NATO. Among international relations theorists, neorealists anticipate a collapse or decline of NATO on the ground that the demise of the external threat would be followed by the dissolution of the winning alliance. On the contrary, neoliberal institutionalists offer a different prediction based upon the major assumptions of the theory. In addition the these two mainstream theories, social constructivism, a new school of thought developed in the 1990s, has provided students of international relations with different approaches to understanding the interactions between international systems and nations' behavior. Although works on post-cold war NTATO by social constructivists are relatively marginal, these theories can be better employed to explain the social aspects of NATO's development. This article will depict the key arguments of these power-based, interests-based, and knowledge-based theories, followed by scholarly discussions centering on creation, endurance, cohesion, and collapse of international military alliances. Then, the predications of and interpretations for NATO in the post-cold war ear by international relations theorists will be illustrated including the theories efficacy or inadequacy.
期刊論文
1.Duffield, John(1994)。Explaining the Long Peace in Europe: The Contributions of Regional Security Regimes。Review of International Studies，20(4)，378。  new window
2.Glaser, Charles(1993)。Why NATO Is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe。International Security，18(1)，26-33。  new window
3.Clarke, J. G.(1993)。Replacing NATO。Foreign Policy，93，22-40。  new window
4.Wohlforth, William C.(1994)。Realism and the End of the Cold War。International Security，19(3)，91-129。  new window
5.Mearsheimer, John J.(1995)。A Realist Reply。International Security，20(1)，82-93。  new window
6.Hemmer, Christopher Michael、Katzenstein, Peter J.(2002)。Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism。International Organization，56(3)，575-607。  new window
7.Rousseau, David L.、Gelpi, Christopher、Reiter, D.、Huth, P. K.(1996)。Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-1988。American Political Science Review，90(3)，512-533。  new window
8.Owen, John M.(1994)。How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace。International Security，19(2)，87-125。  new window
9.Layne, Christopher(1993)。The Unipolar Illusion: Why the New Power Will Rise。International Security，17(4)，5-51。  new window
10.McCalla, Robert B.(1996)。NATO's Persistence after the Cold War。International Organization，50(3)，445-475。  new window
11.Schimmelfennig, Frank(1998)。NATO Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation。Security Studies，8(2/3)，198-234。  new window
12.Wallander, Celeste A.(2000)。Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War。International Organization，54(4)，705-735。  new window
13.Christensen, Thomas J.、Snyder, Jack(1990)。Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity。International Organization，44(2)，137-168。  new window
14.Snyder, Glenn H.(1991)。Alliances, Balance, and Stability。International Organization，45(1)，121-142。  new window
15.Farrell, Theo(2002)。Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program。International Studies Review，4(1)，49-72。  new window
16.Snyder, Glenn H.(2002)。Mearsheimer's World--Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay。International Security，27(1)，149-173。  new window
17.Reus-Smit, Christian(1997)。The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions。International Organization，51(4)，555-589。  new window
18.Keohane, Robert O.、Martin, Lisa L.(1995)。The Promise of Institutionalist Theory。International Security，20(1)，39-51。  new window
19.Mearsheimer, John J.(1990)。Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War。International Security，15(1)，5-56。  new window
20.Moravcsik, Andrew(1997)。Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics。International Organization，51(4)，513-553。  new window
21.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1993)。The Emerging Structure of International Politics。International Security，18(2)，44-79。  new window
22.Schweller, Randall L.(1994)。Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In。International Security，19(1)，72-107。  new window
23.Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。  new window
24.Wendt, Alexander(1995)。Constructing International Politics。International Security，20(1)，71-81。  new window
25.Brzezinski, Z.(1995)。A Plan for Europe。Foreign Affairs，74，26-42。  new window
26.Goldgeier, J. M.(1998)。NATO Expansion: The Anatomy of a Decision。Washington Quarterly，21(1)，85-102。  new window
27.Harries, O.(1993)。The Collapse of the West。Foreign Affairs，72，41-53。  new window
28.Howard, M.(1999)。An Unhappy Successful Marriage: Security Means Knowing What to Expect。Foreign Affairs，78，164-175。  new window
29.Huysmans, J.(2002)。Shape-Shifting NATO: Humanitarian Action and the Kosovo Refugee Crisis。Review of International Studies，28，599-618。  new window
30.Julian, L. F.(2002)。Can Europe Defend Itself?。American Foreign Policy Interests，24(3)，215-222。  new window
31.Waterman, H.、Zagorcheva, D.、Reiter, D.(2001)。Correspondence: NATO and Democracy。International Security，26，221-235。  new window
32.Crawford, N. C.(2000)。The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships。International Security，24，116-156。  new window
33.Deudney, D.、Ikenberry, G. J.(1993)。The Logic of the West。World Policy Journal，10，17-25。  new window
34.Duffield, J. S.(1992)。International Regimes and Alliance Behavior: Explaining NATO Conventional Force Levels。International Organization，46，819-855。  new window
35.Duffield, J. S.(1994)。NATO's Functions after the Cold War。Political Science Quarterly，109，763-787。  new window
36.Garnham, D.(1985)。Extending Deterrence with German Nuclear Weapons。International Security，10，96-110。  new window
37.Gordon, P. H.(1996)。Recasting the Atlantic Alliance。Survival，38，32-57。  new window
38.Hellmann, G.、Wolf, R.(1993)。Neorealism, Neoliberal Institutionalism, and the Future of NATO。Security Studies，3，3-43。  new window
39.Jervis, R.、Nau, H. R.、Schweller, R. L.(2002)。Correspondence: Institutionalized Disagreement。International Security，27，174-185。  new window
40.Kegley, C. W., Jr.(1993)。The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities。International Studies Quarterly，37，131-147。  new window
41.Kratochwil, F.(1993)。The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics。Review of International Studies，19，63-80。  new window
42.Kupchan, C. A.(1995)。The Promise of Collective Security。International Security，20，52-61。  new window
43.Kydd, Andrew(2001)。Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement。International Organization，55，801-828。  new window
44.Ness, G. D.、Brechin, S. R.(1988)。Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations。International Organization，42，245-273。  new window
45.Reiter, D.(2001)。Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy?。International Security，25，41-67。  new window
46.Ruggie, J. G.(1995)。The False Promise of Realism。International Security，20，62-70。  new window
47.Serling-Folker, J.(2002)。Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting Reconstructing, or Rereading。International Studies Review，4，73-97。  new window
48.Walt, S. M.(1988)。Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia。International Organization，42，275-316。  new window
49.Walt, S. M.(1997)。Why Alliance Endure or Collapse。Survival，39，156-179。  new window
圖書
1.Holsti, O. R.、Hopmann, P. T.、Sullivan, J. D.(1973)。Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies。New York, NY：John Wiley and Sons。  new window
2.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
3.Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood(1989)。World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relationships。Columbia, South Carolina：University of South Carolina Press。  new window
4.Kay, Sean(1998)。NATO and the Future of European Security。Lanham：Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
5.Ruggie, John Gerard(1998)。Constructing the World Polity: Essays in International Institutionalization。Routledge。  new window
6.Grieco, Joseph M.(1990)。Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-tariff Barriers to Trade。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。  new window
7.Russett, Bruce、Antholis, William、Ember, Carol R.、Ember, Melvin、Maoz, Zeev(1993)。Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World。Princeton, N.J.：Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。  new window
10.Hasenclever, Andreas、Mayer, Peter、Rittberger, Volker(1997)。Theories of International Regimes。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。  new window
12.Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
13.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regimes。Cornell University Press。  new window
15.Kaldor, M.、Vejvoda, I.(1999)。Democratization in Central and East European Countries: An Overview。Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe。London, UK。  new window
16.Kissinger, H.(1993)。Diplomacy。Diplomacy。New York, NY。  new window
17.Rauchhaus, R. W.(2001)。Marching NATO Eastward: Can International Relations Theory Keep Pace?。Explaining NATO Enlargement。London, UK。  new window
18.Sandler, T.、Hartley, K.(1999)。The Political Economy of NATO: Past, Present, and into the 21st Century。The Political Economy of NATO: Past, Present, and into the 21st Century。Cambridge。  new window
19.Bland, D. L.(1991)。The Military Committee of the North Atlantic Alliance: A Study of Structure and Strategy。The Military Committee of the North Atlantic Alliance: A Study of Structure and Strategy。New York, NY。  new window
20.Blau, P. M.、Meyer, M. W.(1987)。Bureaucracy in Modern Society。Bureaucracy in Modern Society。New York, NY。  new window
21.Caporaso, J. A.(1992)。Has Europe Changed? Neorealism, Institutions, and Domestic Politics in the New Europe。Europe in Transition: The Management of Security after the Cold War。London, UK。  new window
22.Hass, E. B.(2001)。Organization Theory: Remedy for Europe's Organizational Cacophony?。Explaining NATO Enlargement。London, UK。  new window
23.Kupchan, C. A.(2001)。The Origins and Future of NATO Enlargement。Explaining NATO Enlargement。London, UK。  new window
24.McNeely, C. L.(1995)。Constructing the Nation-State, International Organization and Prescriptive Action。Constructing the Nation-State, International Organization and Prescriptive Action。Westport, CT。  new window
25.Risse-Kappen, T.(1995)。Cooperation Among Democracies, Norms, Transnational Relations, and the European Impact on U. S. Foreign Policy。Cooperation Among Democracies, Norms, Transnational Relations, and the European Impact on U. S. Foreign Policy。Princeton。  new window
26.Sloan, S. R.(1995)。NATO's Future: Beyond Collective Defense。NATO's Future: Beyond Collective Defense。Washington, DC。  new window
27.Snyder, G. H.(1991)。Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut。The Evolution of Theory in International Relations。Columbia。  new window
28.Waltz, K. N.(2001)。NATO Expansion: A Realist's View。Explaining NATO Enlargement。London, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：908（臺灣：906，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67493042
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上