:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科舉文獻與「科舉學」
書刊名:臺大歷史學報
作者:劉海峰
作者(外文):Liu, Hai-feng
出版日期:2003
卷期:32
頁次:頁269-297
主題關鍵詞:科舉學科舉文獻考試硃卷八股文Study of imperial examinationLiterature of imperial examinationExaminationRed copy of examination paperEight-part essays
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:35
「科舉學」是科舉時代的固有辭彙,古代「科舉學」即「科舉之學」,一般是指備考科舉的學間,曾包含「文選學」、「策學」等專學。現代「科舉學」則是指研究科舉的專學,是以中國和其他東亞國家歷史上存在的科舉制度及其運作的歷史為研究對象的一門專學,已逐漸成為一門國際性的學問。「科舉學」不是關於一時一地或一人一書的學問,而是與一千三百年間大部分知名人物、大部分書籍和幾乎所有地區有關的一門學問;不是關於中國傳統文化局部,而是關於中國傳統文化整體的一門專學,又是至今還有相當現實意義並和東亞及西方主要國家的歷史有關的一門專學。從科舉文獻的角度,可以明顯地看出「科舉學」的廣博性。 狹義的科舉文獻主要包括登科錄、題名錄、鄉試錄、會試錄、同年錄、科齒錄、硃卷、闈墨等以及八股文、試帖詩選本和現存各類科舉試卷、備考科舉的專門書籍,其數量巨大,是中國歷史文獻中一個專門獨立的大類,具有很高的歷史學、教育學、政治學、社會學、文學和人文地理學研究價值。在中國的歷史文獻中,很少有像科舉文獻這樣數量眾多、價值甚高卻尚未被充分利用的一類。自成體系、內容豐富的科舉文獻充分地體現出「科舉學」的廣博性,從一個方面有力地支撐著「科舉學」的學科構架,使「科舉學」這一具有遠大發展前景的專學得以逐步形成和完善。
“Study of Imperial Examination” (Ke-Ju-Xue科舉學) was an expression used in China Imperial Examination times. “Study of Imperial Examinations” in ancient times meant “a branch of knowledge about Imperial Examinations”, which general1y referred to the knowledge prepared for Imperial Examination, once including such specialized studies as Study of Selected Works (Wen-Xuan-Xue文選學) and Study of Policy (Ce-Xue策學). “Study of Imperial Examination” in modern times has become a specialized study for Imperial Examinations, which researches the Imperial Examination system and the history of its operation existing in the history of China and East Asian countries and, has been developed into a international systematic learning. “Study of Imperial Examination” is not a branch of knowledge about one time, one place or one work and one person but a branch of knowledge relevant to wel1-known figures, most works and almost all Chinese and Korean and Vietnaese districts for 1300 years. It is not a specialized study about some sections but the whole of Chinese traditional culture. And it is also a specialized study with realistic significance and relating to the history of East Asian and Western countries. From the perspective of literature of Imperial Examination, the extension of “Study of Imperial Examination” is observed. Documents of Imperial Examination in a narrow sense mainly include Records of Palace Examination (登科錄), Records of Metropolitan Examination (會試錄), Records of Provincial Examinations (鄉試錄), red copy of examination paper (硃卷), and eight-part essay, selections of Examination Verse (試帖詩), a variety of examination papers in stock and specialized books for preparing for Imperial Examination, of which the number is very large. It is a specialized and independent category among the historic documents of China with high research value for history, pedagogy, political science, social science, humanities and geography. Among examples of Chinese historical literature, there is seldom such kinds of literature as documents of Imperial Examinations with in such large number and with such high value, but which are not fully uti1ized. Documents about the Imperial Examination with its own system and rich content ref1ect the extension of “Study of Imperial Examination” and strongly support the academic construction of “Study of Imperial Examination” in one respect. And, they lead to the gradual formation and perfection of this prospective “Study of Imperial Examination”.
期刊論文
1.Kracke, E. A., Jr.(1947)。Family vs Merit in Chinese Civil Service Examinations under the Empire。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,10,103-121。  new window
2.周彥文(19970600)。論歷代書目中的制舉類書籍。中國書目季刊,31(1),1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭啟慶(19830500)。元統元年進士錄校注。食貨月刊,13(1/2),72-90。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘光旦、費孝通(1947)。科舉與社會流動。社會科學,4(1),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉祥光(19960900)。時文稿:科舉時代的考生必讀。近代中國史研究通訊,22,49-68。  延伸查詢new window
6.周紹泉(1999)。徽州文書與徽學。歷史研究,1999(12),54-55。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉海峰(1998)。「科舉學」:一門古老而全新的學問。高教自學考試,1998(2),10-12。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉海峰(2002)。「科舉學」:求解科舉研究的最大值。河北師範大學學報,2002(3),5-10。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1840)。China: its Early History, Literature, and Language; Mistranslation of Chinese Official Documents; Causes of the Present War。Westminster Review,34(2),280。  new window
10.張祝平(1995)。《四庫全書》與科舉文獻。貴州社會科學,1995(3),106-110。  延伸查詢new window
11.沈登苗(1998)。也談天一閣藏明代登科錄。浙江學刊,1998(2),108-111。  延伸查詢new window
12.駱兆平(1984)。談天一閣藏明代科舉錄。文獻,1984(20),100-126。  延伸查詢new window
13.宮雲維(2002)。試論宋人筆記中科舉史料的特點。浙江學刊,2002(5),185-189。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳建華(1995)。科舉制下進士的社會功能。蘇州大學學報,1995(1),90-97。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉海峰(2001)。論「科舉學」的廣博性─以福建科舉為例。東南學術,2001(1),112-116。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1849)。Journal of Occurrence: Literary and Military Examinations。Chinese Repository,18(11),610。  new window
17.Oxenham, E. L.(1888)。Ages of Candidates at Chinese Examinations; Tabular Statement。Journal of the China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society,22,286-287。  new window
18.中國第一歷史檔案館(2002)。光緒癸巳科廣東鄉試史料(上)/(下)。歷史檔案,2002(1)/2002(2),37-48。  延伸查詢new window
19.于志嘉(1990)。明代軍戶の社會的地位にっぃて--科舉と任官において。東洋學報,71(3)/71(4),311-351。  延伸查詢new window
20.中嶋敏(1994)。宋進士登科題名錄と同年小錄。汲古,26。  延伸查詢new window
21.大野晃嗣(1999)。明代廷試の合格者と初任官ポスト-《同年齒錄》とその統計的利用。東洋史研究,58(1)。  延伸查詢new window
22.張傑(1999)。高鶚會試履歷的發現及其史料價值。滿族研究,1999(4),79-82。  延伸查詢new window
23.何懷宏(1996)。清代硃卷的應試功能。中國社會科學季刊,141-169。  延伸查詢new window
24.張傑(2002)。清代硃卷的文獻價值。文獻,2002(2),232-241。  延伸查詢new window
25.劉海峰(1999)。「科舉學」的世紀回顧。廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1999(3),15-23。  延伸查詢new window
26.高平叔(1990)。蔡元培的科舉生涯。歷史教學,1990(3),2-5。  延伸查詢new window
27.(1987)。元代科舉與菁英流動。漢學研究,5(1),129-160。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.朱瑞熙(1994)。陳亮與科舉。杭州。108-120。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.宋濂(1995)。元史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭曦原(2001)。帝國的回憶─〈紐約時報〉晚清觀查記。帝國的回憶─〈紐約時報〉晚清觀查記。北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.李周望(1969)。明清歷科進士題名碑錄。臺北市:華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chaffee, John W.(1985)。The Thorny Gates of Learning in Sung China。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.汪琬(1987)。堯峰文鈔。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱保炯、謝沛霖(1979)。明清進士題名碑錄索引。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.駱兆平(1993)。天一閣叢談。北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡春(1990)。歷代教育筆記資料(冊三)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.Elman, Benjamin A.(2000)。A Cultural History of Civil Examination in Late Imperial China。A Cultural History of Civil Examination in Late Imperial China。Berkeley。  new window
10.龔自珍、王佩諍(1975)。龔自珍全集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉昫(1975)。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.張杰(200307)。清代科舉家族。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.顧炎武、黃汝成、秦克誠(1994)。日知錄集釋。湖南長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
14.商衍鎏(1958)。清代科舉考試述錄。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
15.袁桷(1999)。清容居士集。香港:迪志文化。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢大昕(1997)。嘉定錢大昕全集。江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.李燾、上海師範大學古籍整理研究所、華東師範大學古籍研究所(1979)。續資治通鑑長編。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.張仲禮(1955)。The Chinese Gentry: Studies on Their Role in Nineteenth-century Chinese Society。University of Washington Press。  new window
19.何炳棣(1962)。The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368-1911。Columbia University Press。  new window
20.賈志楊(1995)。宋代科舉。東大。  延伸查詢new window
21.陸游、李劍雄、劉德權(1979)。老學庵筆記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.沈曾植、錢仲聯(2001)。沈曾植集校注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.張岳(2000)。小山類稿。福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.Kracke, E. A.(1957)。Religion, Family and Individual in the Chinese Examination System。Chinese Thought and Institutions。Chicago。  new window
25.劉海峰(2003)。科舉教育與「科舉學」。中國書院史(五)。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
26.劉永(2001)。牛津人的輝煌。牛津人的輝煌。延吉。  延伸查詢new window
27.Fairbank, John King(2000)。美國與中國。美國與中國。北京。  延伸查詢new window
28.岳珂(1984)。愧郯錄。揚州。  延伸查詢new window
29.李大東(1996)。明代進士題名校勘記。天一閣論叢。寧波。  延伸查詢new window
30.李成茂(1997)。韓國科舉制度史。韓國科舉制度史。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
31.黃建國、金初昇(1988)。中國所藏高麗古籍綜錄。中國所藏高麗古籍綜錄。上海。  延伸查詢new window
32.張希清(1993)。中國科舉考試制度。中國科舉考試制度。北京。  延伸查詢new window
33.宮崎市定(1963)。科舉─中國の試驗地獄。科舉─中國の試驗地獄。東京。  延伸查詢new window
34.潘光旦(1995)。明清兩代嘉興的望族。明清兩代嘉興的望族。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)章如愚(1992)。山堂考索,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.英匯(1995)。欽定科場條例,上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.(宋)黃震(1984)。黃氏日抄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(南宋)葉適(1983)。水心集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)陳謨。海桑集。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)盛康(1973)。皇朝經世文編續編,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(明)曹安(1988)。讕言長語,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.丁若鏞。茶山全書。  延伸查詢new window
9.張海鵬(2000)。徽學漫議,北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.Semedo, Alvaroz(1667)。分成三個部分的中國通史,Lyons。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1939)。登科錄,上海。  延伸查詢new window
12.張朝瑞(1996)。皇明貢舉考,濟南。  延伸查詢new window
13.中國史經典文獻目錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1903)。中外時務策問類編大成。  延伸查詢new window
15.(清)徐乃昌。宋元科舉三錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE