:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:TAIFEX與MSCI臺股指數期貨與現貨直接避險策略之研究
書刊名:商管科技季刊
作者:邱建良魏志良吳佩珊邱哲修 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Chien-liangWei, Chih-liangWu, Pei-shanChiou, Jer-shiou
出版日期:2004
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁169-184
主題關鍵詞:避險股價指數期貨誤差修正模型卡爾曼濾淨器GARCH模型HedgeIndex futuresError correction modelKalman filterGARCH
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
     本研究以TAIFEX與MSCI兩種臺股指數期貨來規避其股價指數現貨之風險。運用OLS模型、誤差修正模型、單變量GARCH(1,1)、雙變量GARCH(1,1)與卡爾曼濾淨器等避險模型來估計避險比率,並比較兩種避險工具在不同模型下之避險效果,以尋求最適的避險工具供投資大眾參考。 實證結果發現兩種臺股指數期貨與現貨之時間序列資料並非呈常態分配,且其水準項具有單根的性質,而經一階差分之後(差分項)則皆成為定態數列。此外,兩種臺股指數現貨及期貨間皆存在共整合關係,此乃表示其現貨與期貨間存在有長期均衡關係。樣本外的避險效果比較則說明兩種避險工具在單變量GARCH(1,1)模型下可得到最佳的避險效果,且發現不論在各類模型下,MSCI摩根臺股指數期貨之避險效果皆較TAIFEX臺股指數期貨為佳。
     This paper considers hedge and basis simultaneously to investigate MSCI Taiwan Index futures and TAIFEX Stock Index futures, and we compare which is appropriate to hedge the Taiwan stock Index. It compares the hedging effectiveness in ECM model, univariate GARCH, bivariate GARCH model and Kalman filter model. The main empirical results re as follows, we find the significance of unit roots and thus the non-stationary of the price series, so price series should be difference to induce stationary. We also find evidence of cointegration between spot and futures prices. In the out-of-sample comparison, The univariate GARCH model outperforms all other hedging models, and TAIFEX Stock Index futures is the best instrument to hedge the Taiwan stock Index.
期刊論文
1.Benet, B. A.(1992)。Hedging period length and ex-ante futures hedging effectiveness: The case of foreign exchange risk cross hedges。Journal of Futures Markets,12,163-175。  new window
2.Working, Holbrook(1953)。Futures trading and hedging。American Economic Review,43(3),314-343。  new window
3.Junkus, J. C.、Lee, C. F.(1985)。Use of Three Stock Index Futures in Hedging Decisions。Journal of Futures Markets,5(2),231-237。  new window
4.Yeh, Sally C.、Gannon, Gerard L.(2000)。Comparing Trading Performance of the Constant and Dynamic Hedge Models: A Note。Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,14(2),155-160。  new window
5.Gagnon, L.、Lypny, G.(1997)。The Binefits of Dynamically Hedging the Toronto 35 Stock Index。Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,14(1),69-78。  new window
6.Park, T. H.、Switzer, L. N.(1995)。Bivariate GARCH Estimation of the Optimal Hedge Ratios for Stock Index Future: A Note。Journal of Futures Markets,15,61-67。  new window
7.Nelson, C. R.、Plosser, C. I.(1982)。Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications。Journal of Monetary Economics,10(2),139-162。  new window
8.Witt, Stephen F.、Martin, Christine A.(1987)。Econometric Models for Forecasting International Tourism Demand。Journal of Travel Research,25(3),23-30。  new window
9.Bollerslev, Tim(1986)。Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity。Journal of Econometrics,31(3),307-327。  new window
10.Engle, Robert F.、Granger, Clive W. J.(1987)。Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing。Econometrica,55(2),251-276。  new window
11.Ederington, Louis H.(1979)。The Hedging Performance of the New Futures Markets。Journal of Finance,34(1),157-170。  new window
12.Figlewski, Stephen(1984)。Hedging Performance and Basis Risk in Stock Index Futures。Journal of Finance,39(3),657-669。  new window
13.Gray, Roger W.、Rutledge, David J. S.(1971)。The Economics of Commodity Futures Markets: A Survey。Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics,39(4),57-108。  new window
14.Engle, Robert F.(1982)。Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation。Econometrica,50(4),987-1008。  new window
其他
1.張峻銘(2000)。台股指數期貨避險之研究--時間數列模型與技術分析之應用。  延伸查詢new window
2.林茂南(1999)。股票投資組合運用台指期貨避險策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.王呈晃(1999)。台股指數期貨避險續效之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.溫曜誌(1998)。以SIMEX台股指數期貨規避台灣股價指數風險之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cecchetti, S. G., Cumby, R. E., & Figlewski, S.(1988)。Estimation of the optimal futures hedg。  new window
6.Ferguson, R., & Leistikow, D.(1999)。Futures hedge profit measurement, error-correction model vs. regression approach hedge ratios., and data error effects。  new window
7.Holmes, P., & Antoniou, A.(1996)。Futures market rfficiency, the unbiasedness hypothesis and variance-bounds tests: The case of the FTSE-100 futures contract。  new window
8.Koutmos, G., & Pericli, A(1999)。Hedging GNMA mortgage-backed securities with T-Note futures: Dynamic versus static jedging。  new window
9.Kroner, K. F., & Sultan, J.(1993)。Program trading, Non-Program trading and market volatility。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE