It was far from an isolated and personal event that Chiang had resigned from president and revived for three times Instead, it reflects the complex social relationship inside the Kuomintang There were many similarities between the three resignations Chiang was all coerced into resigning, was back to his home town Xikou, and once again got back to power in the long run However, there were still differences his mental condition, political situation were different Thus, they all ended in different ways This essay is primarily about his third resignation in 1949 and at the same time makes some comparison between the three periods. Since Chiang was still the chairman of the Kuomintang in spite of his announcement to resign, he virtually had visitors every day after he went back to Xikou. John Stuart Leighton commented that: "Actually, he was planning strategies for military and for every other aspect." Chiang also gave some indication to those important officials who visited and consulted him. At the same time, he fought with Li Tsung-jen on issues such as migration to Taiwan because of its weapon and gold, The Executive Yuan's movement to Canton, and the peaceful conference with the Communist Party in Peiping. As a result, it's surely worthy of valuing whether Chiang's management has something to do with the change, or the worse, of the situation then. Chiang formed the habit of doing the morning works and keeping a diary almost every day. Besides hiking around, he also made it a rule to study the national conditions and read, He often read the Bible or the literary works of Wang Young-ming. He as well read many data about his family tree and revised it in the end. This contribution to his family members can also be attributed to his days in Xikou. Researchers in the past focused mostly on Chiang's political impact on the Kuomintang. This essay also mentions his home life during the period in Xikou, which was his scarce relax. As his age grew older and his experiences became richer, Chiang knew better how to cherish the time with his family as well. If we can also pay attention to his ordinary life while caring only about the political history, we can see the other side of the ruler more easily.