臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺北市土地混合使用特性對旅次發生之影響
書刊名：臺灣土地研究
作者：林楨家 引用關係／蕭博正
作者(外文)：Lin, Jen-jia／Hsiao, Po-cheng
出版日期：2006
卷期：9:1
頁次：頁89-114
主題關鍵詞：土地混合使用；旅次發生；迴歸分析；Land mixed-use；Trip generation；Regression analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:64
本研究之目的在實證分析土地混合使用對旅次發生的影響，以台北市 187個交通分區為分析樣本，使用稅捐稽徵處與交通局分別提供的土地使用與旅運需求資料，模式自變數包含控制變數與土地混合使用變數，後者包括混合種類數、混合內容以及混合強度等三方面特性，應變數為旅次發生數。利用多元迴歸分析校估影響關係，並進行各項假設檢定，以獲得最佳線性不偏估計式。實證研究結果發現：過度的混合使用會產生旅次積累效應而增加旅次量，居住─就業以及零售業--就業的混合方式將能減少旅次發生數，住宅區內允許零售業的混合使用將令旅次發生數增加，上述影響會因為不同旅次目的而有顯著的差異。最後，根據所確認之影響效果研提可行且具體的台北市都市發展策略，以達到減少旅運需求之目標。
This study investigates influences of mixed land use on trip generation. The samples are from 187 traffic zones of Taipei City, based on the data of land utilization and travel demand offered by the Revenue Service of Taipei City and Bureau of Transportation of Taipei City, respectively. The independent variables include control variables and mixed land use variables. The latter includes the different kinds of mixture, the content of mixture, and the intensity of mixture. The dependent variable is trip generation. The paper evaluates the influences using Multiple Regression Models and concludes that: (1) excessive mixed land use increases trip generation; (2) mixing housing and employment land uses and retail and employment land uses decreases trip generation; (3) the allowance of retail activities in the residential zone increases trip generation; and (4) the influences of mixed land use on trip generation differ significantly differ for varied trip purposes. Finally, feasible and concrete strategies for Taipei City development according to the estimated influences are recommended to decrease trip generation.
期刊論文
1.Cervero, R.(1996)。Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey。Transportation Research Part A，30(5)，361-377。  new window
2.Crane, R.、Crepeau, R.(1998)。Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data。Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment，3(4)，225-238。  new window
3.馮正民、方志文(1993)。運輸需求管理研析。運輸，22，77-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bagley, M. N.、Mokhtarian, P. L.(2002)。The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach。The Annals of Regional Science，36(2)，279-297。  new window
5.Cervero, R.(1988)。Land-use Mixing and Suburban Mobility。Transportation Quarterly，42(3)，429-446。  new window
6.Cervero, R.、Radisch, C.(1996)。Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods。Transport Policy，3(3)，127-141。  new window
7.Crane, R.(2000)。The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review。Journal of Planning Literature，15(1)，3-23。  new window
8.Ewing, R.、Deanna, M.、Li, S. C.(1996)。Land Use Impacts on Trip Generation Rates。Transportation Research Record，1518，1-6。  new window
9.Handy, S.(1996)。Methodologies for Exploring The Link between Urban Form and Travel Behavior。Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment，1(2)，151-165。  new window
10.Boarnet, G. M.、Greenwald, M. J.(1999)。Land Use, Urban Design, and Nonwork Travel: Reproducing Other Urban Areas' Empirical Test Results in Portland, Oregon。Transportation Research Record，1772，27-37。  new window
11.Boarnet, G. M.、Sarmiento, S.(1998)。Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of Link Between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics。Urban Study，35(7)，1155-1169。  new window
12.Cervero, R.(1991)。Land Use and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers。Transportation Quarterly，45，479-491。  new window
13.Cervero, R.、Kockelman, K.(1997)。Travel Demand and 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design。Transportation Research，2(3)，199-219。  new window
14.Colorado、Wyoming Section Technical Committee(1987)。Trip Generation for Mixed Use Developments。ITE Journal，57，27-29。  new window
15.Dieleman, F. M.、Dijst, M.、Burghouwt, G.(2000)。Urban Form and Travel Behavior: Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential Context。Urban Studies，39(3)，507-527。  new window
16.Giuliano, G.、Small, K. A.(1993)。Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?。Urban Studies，30(9)，1485-1500。  new window
17.Marlon, G. B.、Sarmiento, S.(1997)。Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link Between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics。Urban Studies，35(7)，1155-1169。  new window
18.Stead, D.(1999)。Relationships Between Land Use, Socioeconomic Factors, and Travel Patterns in Britain。Environment and Planning, B: Planning and Design，28，499-528。  new window
19.Zhang, M.(2004)。The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice。Journal of the American Planning Association，70(3)，344-360。  new window
研究報告
1.臺北市政府交通局(2001)。臺北都會區整體運輸規劃基本資料之調查與驗校（二）。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭子齊(2000)。都市土地使用型態對消費性旅次運具選擇行為之影響(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭博正(2003)。臺北市土地混合使用特性對旅運需求之影響，0。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉淑娟(1990)。臺北市停車產生率之研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院國家永續發展委員會(2000)。二十一世紀議程：中華民國永續發展策略綱領。臺北：行政院永續發展委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Meyer, M. D.、Miller, E. J.(2001)。Urban Transportation Planning。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.。  new window
3.Washington, S. P.、Karlaftis, M. G.、Mannering, F. L.(2003)。Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis。Washington, DC：Chapman & Hall/ CRC。  new window
4.交通部(1995)。運輸政策白皮書。臺北：交通部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Boarnet, M. G.、Crane, Randall(2001)。Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.王慶瑞(2001)。運輸系統規劃。臺北市：正揚出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.(1997)。Reclaiming the City: Mixed Use Development。Reclaiming the City: Mixed Use Development。London, UK。  new window
8.Ferguson, E.(2000)。Travel Demand Management and Public Policy。Travel Demand Management and Public Policy。England, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：806（臺灣：783，外國：23） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67423659
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上