:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家庭研究相關議題探討
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:黃秀梨戴玉慈張媚翁麗雀
作者(外文):Huang, Hsiu-liDai, Yu-tzuYeh Chang, MeiWeng, Li-chueh
出版日期:2007
卷期:54:3
頁次:頁69-76
主題關鍵詞:家庭研究方法學議題家庭護理Family researchMethodological issuesFamily nursing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:50
現今的健康照護體系已開始由醫院為基礎的服務,轉向以家庭及社區為導向的照顧模式,家庭護理及家庭研究的發展也逐漸受到重視。家庭是由個人組成的群體,同時具有獨立性及集體性的特性,因此家庭研究的複雜性比個人研究高,衍生出許多概念性及研究方法上的挑戰,本文針對家庭研究概念、研究設計、家庭的定義、取樣、研究工具及資料處理等研究方法學議題進行討論,建議未來進行家庭研究需考量(1) 依據研究問題定位家庭的定義及選擇合適的研究方法;(2) 以理論基礎決定訪談家庭人數及分析單位;(3) 選用具有信度及效度的工具收集資料回應研究問題;(4) 分析方法需與家庭概念及分析單位的特性相符;(5) 重視家庭成員招募的倫理議題,以期獲得高品質的家庭研究成果。
Nowadays, health care delivery systems are changing from hospital-based services to more family-oriented or community-oriented care. The development of family nursing and family research is the focus of more attention than ever before. A family is composed of individuals. It combines the characteristics of individuals and collective groups, which makes family research more complex than studies of individuals. Consequently, research into family-oriented areas presents additional challenges concerning conceptual methodological issues. This article focuses on the issues of family research concepts, research designs, definitions of family, sampling, study tools, and data analysis. In order to promote high-quality family research outcomes, we propose below suggestions to serve as a guide to conducting family research: (1) identify the definition of family involved in a particular research question and choose a suitable methodology; (2) determine the number of family members and units of analysis on theoretical bases; (3) select high-validity, high-reliability research tools in answering research questions; (4) analysis methods must match the concept of family and the characteristics of the units of analysis; (5) ethical issues must be respected in the recruitment of family members.
期刊論文
1.Cromwell, R. E.、Peterson, G. W.(1983)。Multisystem-multimethod family assessment in clinical contexts。Family Process,22(2),147-163。  new window
2.杜友蘭(19980400)。護理的質性與量性研究--哪一類研究比較重要?。護理雜誌,45(2),75-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Astedt-Kurki, P.、Hopia, H.(1996)。The family interview: Exploring experiences of family health and well-being。Journal of Advanced Nursing,24(6),506-511。  new window
4.Astedt-Kurki, P.、Paavilainen, E.、Lehti, K.(2001)。Methodological issues in interviewing families in family nursing。Journal of Advanced Nursing,35(2),288-293。  new window
5.Baumann, S. L.(2000)。Family nursing: Theory-anemic, nursing theory-deprived。Nursing Science Quarterly,13(4),285-290。  new window
6.Baumann, S. L.(2006)。The researcher-person-family process。Nursing Science Quarterly,19(1),14-18。  new window
7.Broome, M. E.、Richards, D.(2003)。The influence of relationships on children's and adolescents’ participation in research。Nursing Research,52(3),191-197。  new window
8.Butcher, H. K.、Holkup, R. A.、Buckwalter, K. C.(2001)。The experience of caring for a family member with Alzheimer’s disease。Western Journal of Nursing Research,23(1),33-55。  new window
9.Deal, J. E.、Anderson, E. R.(1995)。Reporting and interpreting results in family research。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(4),1040-1048。  new window
10.Fisher, L.(1982)。Transactional theories but individual assessment: A frequent discrepancy in family research。Family Process,21,313-320。  new window
11.Gilliss, C. L.(1983)。The family as a unit of analysis: Strategies for the nurse researcher。Advances in Nursing Science,5(1),50-59。  new window
12.Hicks, M. H.、Lam, M. S.(1999)。Decision-making within the social course of dementia: Accounts by Chinese-American caregivers。Culture, Medicine Sc Psychiatry,25(4),415-452。  new window
13.Horowitz, J. A.、Ladden, M. D.、Moriarty, H. J.(2002)。Methodological challenges in research with vulnerable families。Journal of Family Nursing,8(4),315-333。  new window
14.Kitson, G. C.、Sussman, M. B.、Wiliams, G. K.、Zeehandelaar, R. B.、Shickmanter, B. K.、Steinberger, J. L.(1982)。Sampling issues in family research。Journal of Marriage and the Family,44(4),965-981。  new window
15.Lieberman, M.、Fisher, L.(1999)。The effects of family conflict resolution and decision making on the provision of help for an elder with Alzheimer’s disease。The Gerontologist,39(2),159-166。  new window
16.Moriarty, H. J.(1990)。Key issues in the family research process: Strategies for nurse researchers。Advances in Nursing Science,12(3),1-14。  new window
17.Northouse, L. L.、Rosset, T.、Phillips, L.、Mood, D.、Schafenacker, A.、Kershaw, T.(2006)。Research with families facing cancer: The challenges of accrual and retention。Research in Nursing & Health,29(3),199-211。  new window
18.Rayens, M. K.、Svavarsdottir, E. K.(2003)。Focus on research methods, A new methodological approach in nursing research: An actor, partner, and interaction effect model for family outcomes。Research in Nursing & Health,26(5),409-419。  new window
19.Shepard, M. P.、Orsi, A.、Mahon, M. M.、Carroll, R. M.(2002)。Mixed-methods research with vulnerable families。Journal of Family Nursing,5(4),334-352。  new window
20.Snethen, J. A.、Broome, M. E.、Knafl, K.、Deatrick, J. A.、Ahgst, D. B.(2006)。Family patterns of decision-making in pediatric clinical trials。Research in Nursing & Health,29(4),223-232。  new window
21.Thomas, R. B.(1987)。Methodological issues and problems in family health care research。Journal of Marriage and the Family,49(1),65-70。  new window
22.Uphold, C. R.、Strickland, O. I.(1989)。Issues related to the unit of analysis in family nursing research。Western Journal of Nursing Research,11(4),405-417。  new window
23.Willgerodt, M. A.、Killien, M. G.(2004)。Family nursing research with Asia family。Journal of Family Nursing,10(2),149-172。  new window
24.Woods, N. F.、Lewis, F. M.(1992)。Design and measurement challenges in family research。Western Journal of Nursing Research,14(3),397-403。  new window
25.許敏桃(20010400)。臺灣老人家庭照顧研究之評析:護理人類學的觀點。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences,11(2),167-177。  延伸查詢new window
26.Deal, J. E.(1995)。Utilizing Data From Multiple Family Members: A Within-Family Approach。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(4),1109-1121。  new window
27.Campbell, L.、Kashy, D. A.(2002)。Estimating Actor, Partner, and Interaction Effects for Dyadic Data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A User-friendly Guide。Personal Relationships,9(3),327-342。  new window
28.劉影梅、黃璉華(20010600)。既有量表的評價及運用。護理雜誌,48(3),95-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Sabatelli, R. M.、Bartle, S. E.(1995)。Survey approaches to the assessment of family functioning: conceptual, operational, and analytical issues。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(4),1025-1039。  new window
圖書
1.Friedman, M. M.(1998)。Family nursing: Theory and practice。Stamford, CT:Appleton & Lange。  new window
2.Greenstein, Theodore N.(2001)。Methods of family research。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
3.Hanson, S. M. H.、Boyd, S. T.(2001)。Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research。Philadelphia:F. A. Davis。  new window
4.Morris, W.(1982)。The American Heritage Dictionary。Boston:Houghton Mifflin company。  new window
5.Touliatos, J.、Perlmutter, B. F.、Straus, M. A.(2001)。Handbook of family measurement techniques: Abstracts。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
6.Bums, N.、Grove, S. K.(1997)。The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization。Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders。  new window
圖書論文
1.Buehler, C.(2001)。Adjustment。Handbook of family measurement techniques: Abstracts。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Feetham, S. L.(1991)。Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families。Family theory development in nursing: State of the science and art。Philadelphia:F. A. Davis。  new window
3.Schumm, W. R.(2001)。Evolution of the family field: Measurement principles and techniques。Handbook of family measurement techniques: Abstracts。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Sullivan, J.、Fawcett, J.(1991)。The measurement of family phenomena。Family theory development in nursing: State of the science and art。Philadelphia:F. A. Davis。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top