:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小六年級學童經濟素養測驗之編製與相關因素之探討
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:陳煥文李岳鴻
作者(外文):Chen, Huan-wenLi, Yue-hong
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁189-224
主題關鍵詞:經濟素養難度來源能力指標Economic literacySources of difficultyStandard-based index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:158
  本研究目的旨在研究小六經濟素養測驗的心理計量特徵、難度來源及受試能力水準之分析,並探討學童經過九年一貫課程學習後,其經濟素養的表現情形與影響因素之關係。研究中以自編的經濟素養測驗為工具,對小學六年級學生共計1073人施測,測驗內容包含「生產」、「消費」與「理財」等三個經濟內容向度,其分別對應到社會領域「7-3-1」、「7-3-2」及「7-3-3」三個能力指標。測驗結果以ITEMAN軟體分析古典測驗(CTT)特徵,並以BILOGMG軟體進行IRT參數估計。對於整體學生而言,測驗平均答對率為0.59,其中「7-3-1」指標內容較困難,而「7-3-3」則最容易。學生的經濟素養表現與在校社會科成績相關為0.57,達顯著水準。   研究中初步將試題分析為二個難度層次,將學生表現區分為三個水準以進行分析。研究結果發現主要的難度來源包含「命題情境是否偏離學生生活經驗」、「敘述內容是否抽象」、「圖文訊息量多寡程度」等三個因素;而水準一學生平均答對率低於0.35,水準二學生約為0.57而水準三學生則高於0.70。整體而言,學生對於「7-3-1」指標的內容較不了解,尤其以「分工與專業化」、「市場」經濟概念作為命題時,學生表現不佳。 調查變項中,不同行政區域、性別、父母親職業別、學生獲知管道數、父母理財工具數及記帳頻率的學生經濟素養表現有顯著差異,且合起來可以有效解釋學生經濟素養能力的13.5%變異量,此外這些背景變項的各個類別在達到各個能力水準的學生比例亦有顯著差異。
The main purpose of this research was to study the economic literacy of 16th grade students who had finished related courses. The effects of several factors on student performance on the test of economic literacy were studied. The sample of this study was composed of 1073 6th graders. The three subcontent area included in the test are production, consumption and managing finances, corresponding to the standard-based index 7-3-1, 7-3-2 and 7-3-3, respectively. IRT item parameters were calibrated using BILOGMG. The average P-value for the test was 0.59. The subcontent of production was the most difficult one. By contrast, the subcontent of managing finances was the easiest one. The correlation coefficient between the scores on the test and social studies was 0.57and the value was statistically significant. In the study, the items were divided into two levels and the samples were divided into three groups. The main sources of difficulty included the degree of the familiarity with the context presented, the abstractness of the descriptions and the amount of information contained in the items. The average p-values for level 1, 2, and 3 students were 0.35, 0.57, and 0.70, respectively. All subject samples had poor performance on the economic concepts of the division of labor, specialization and market.
期刊論文
1.程健教(1990)。我國兒童社會學需要經濟學教育素養。幼兒教育年刊,2,46-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.廖永靜(19960200)。國民小學經濟教育。教師之友,37(1),32-45。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭金水(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要社會領域第一學習階段經濟主題軸的內涵與教學問題。國教新知,41(5),頁4-29。  延伸查詢new window
4.Craft, R. K.,、Baker, J. G.(2003)。Do economists make better lawyers? Undergraduate degree fields and Lawyer earnings。Journal of Economic Education,34 (3),263-281。  new window
5.Lopus, J.、Placone, D.(2002)。Online stock market games for high schools。Journal of Economic Education,33 (2),192。  new window
6.Shor, M.(2003)。Game theory.net。Journal of Economic Education,34(4),388。  new window
研究報告
1.Georgia Department of Education.(2004)。Overview of the proposed social studies curriculum K – 12。Georgia State。  new window
學位論文
1.溫騰光(1992)。國民中小學經濟教育課程內涵之研究(博士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王若文(1992)。臺北市國中生經濟認知與態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉慧貞(2003)。國小社會科經濟領域課程實施之行動研究-以一個台北市國小四年級的班級為例,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴淑齡(2002)。國小社會科教師經濟專業知能之研究-以台北地區為例,台北縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐用生(1991)。國民小學社會科教學研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.林世華主編(2004)。國民中小學九年一貫課程學習成就評量指標與方法手冊。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.National Council on Economic Education.(1997)。Voluntary national content standards in economics。New York。  new window
5.New Jersey Department of Education.(2003)。New Jersey core curriculum content standards for social studies。New Jersey State。  new window
6.New York Department of Education.(2002)。Learning standards for New York State。New York State。  new window
其他
1.National Assessment Governing Board.(2002)。Assessment framework - 2006 NAEP in economics,Washington, DC。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schug, M. C.、Walstad, W. B.(1991)。Teaching and learning economics。Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning: A project of the National Council for the Social Studies。New York:Macmillian Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE