:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《紅樓夢》中薛蟠角色意義新論
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:李天祥
作者(外文):Li, Tian-xiang
出版日期:2008
卷期:28
頁次:頁139-141+143-176
主題關鍵詞:紅樓夢薛蟠賈寶玉薛寶釵陰陽The dream of the red chamberXue PanJia Bao-yuXue Bao-chaiYin-yang
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:135
在《紅樓夢》的研究中,薛蟠一向乏人注目,一般評論或將其與其他紈袴子弟合而論述,斥責其惡行劣跡,未見其個人明顯特質,或視其為丑角,而忽略了作者對此一角色含藏了極大的巧思與苦心。 深受魏晉名士思想影響,崇尚自然的曹雪芹,在薛蟠的角色中寄寓了「率真」的思想,和賈寶玉一樣具有其類似性的意義,但是在「情」、「欲」的特質中,他和賈寶玉有不同的表現,如此在率真的角色意義上,又和賈寶玉形成陽陰的對比,暗喻倒轉中國傳統「氣性論」「貴陽而賤陰」的傳統。他除了和賈府諸紈袴形成對照,更和薛寶釵的禮教典型分別有「相互對待的態度-率直現真與規謹內斂」、「內在性格的對顯-熱與冷」的對比。而其所具有的「情悟」經驗,正襯托出寶玉在塵世「情悟」歷程,故此一角色,其實具有極特殊的意義。
In the studies of The Dream of the Red Chamber, Xue Pan has rarely been noticed. Some critics regard him as a playboy, blaming his misbehaviors and neglecting his unique characteristics, whereas others see him as a clown. Both views ignore the author's great intention behind this character. This paper suggests that as in the case of Jia Bao-yu, Cao Xue-qin also portrays Xue Pan in line with his idea of “naturalness” (shuaizhen). Accordingly the two characters occupy a similar place in the vision of the novel. However, in their attitudes toward affection and desire, Xue and Jia are very different. Cao depicts this difference by invoking the contrast between yang (embodied in Xue) and yin (embodied in Jia), thus presenting an implicit reversal of the traditional qi-based doctrine of human nature which praises yang over yin. Apart from serving as a contrast to other playboys in the novel, Xue Pan also stands in sharp contrast to Xue Bao-chai: while the former is marked by his genuineness toward other people and his warn temperament, the latter is noted for her conformism and cool temperament. Finally, Xue Pan's enlightening experience in the realm of affections (qingwu) offers great illuminations on the unfolding processes of Jia Bao-yu's similar enlightenment. This suggests that Xue indeed assumes a highly significant role in The Dream of the Red Chamber.
期刊論文
1.王昌偉(20051200)。求同與存異:張載與王廷相氣論之比較。漢學研究,23(2)=47,133-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王童(1998)。教育決定人的素質高低─薛家兄妹比較談。南都學壇(人文社會科學學報),1998(2)。  延伸查詢new window
3.孔昭琪(1998)。《紅樓夢》中的三處敗筆。泰安師專學報,11()4。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋子俊(2004)。驕橫而不奸惡,大俗而見諧趣─論《紅樓夢》中的薛蟠形象。甘肅高師學報,9(6)。  延伸查詢new window
5.黎音(1986)。豐富.複雜.統一─薛蟠性格瑣議。紅樓夢學刊,1986(3)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李贄(1982)。初潭集。台北:漢京文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.曹雪芹(1977)。戚蓼生序鈔本石頭記。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳慶浩(1979)。新編石頭記脂硯齋評語輯校增訂本。新編石頭記脂硯齋評語輯校增訂本。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.朱熹(1963)。朱子全集。臺北:大方書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.一粟(1963)。古典文學研究資料匯編:紅樓夢卷。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.房玄齡(1987)。晉書。北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.Forster, E. M.、李文彬(2002)。小說面面觀--現代小說寫作的藝術。臺北:志文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Buber, Martin、Kaufmann, Walter(1970)。I and Thou。Edinburgh:T&T Clark。  new window
9.曹雪芹、高鶚、馮其庸(2003)。紅樓夢校注。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1986)。朱子語類。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.王守仁(1970)。王陽明全書。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉安、劉文典、馮逸、喬華(1989)。淮南鴻烈集解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉世德(2003)。《紅樓夢》版本探微。華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.王廷相(1989)。王廷相集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.顏鈞、黃宣民(1996)。顏鈞集。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.牟宗三(1985)。才性與玄理。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.許慎、段玉裁(2001)。說文解字注。臺北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
18.童元方(1977)。論紅樓夢中的丑角。紅樓夢研究集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.郭玉雯(2004)。紅樓夢中的情欲與禮教-紅樓夢與明清思想。情欲明清-遂欲篇。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.余英時(1996)。曹雪芹的反傳統思想。紅樓夢中的兩個世界。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.柯慶明(1989)。論《紅樓夢》的喜劇意識。境界的再生。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(漢)董仲舒。春秋繁露,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.(晉)陳壽(1984)。三國志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(南宋)朱熹(1988)。四書集註,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)王艮(1995)。重刻心齋王先生語錄,臺北/臺南。  延伸查詢new window
5.(魏)劉劭(1965)。人物志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)馮夢龍(1985)。情史類略,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)黃宗羲(1965)。明儒學案,臺北=Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳萬益(1985)。說賈寶玉的「意淫」和「情不情」。曹雪芹與紅樓夢。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐麗娟(2006)。《紅樓夢》論析--「寶」與「玉」之重疊與分化。紅樓夢人物立體論。臺北:里仁。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE