:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討警察參與清潔針具計畫的意願及影響因素
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:陳政惠劉韋利吳姿瑩江欣怡賴怡因柯乃熒
作者(外文):Chen, Cheng-huiLiu, Wei-liWu, Tzu-yingChiang, Hsin-iLai, Yi-yinKo, Nai-ying
出版日期:2009
卷期:28:4
頁次:頁312-321
主題關鍵詞:清潔針具計畫知識態度靜脈毒癮者參與意願Needle exchange programsKnowledgeAttitudeInjection drug usersWillingness of participating
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
目標:本研究是在全面實施清潔針具計畫後,探討影響警察參與此計畫的意願及其相關因素。方法:採橫斷式研究法,便利取樣南部七縣市參與清潔針具計畫說明會之警察,其參與清潔針具計畫的意願為本研究的依變項,分為「主動積極配合(主動積極)」、「政策命令只好配合(配合政策)」和「非常不願意配合(無意願)」三個類別。以結構式問卷採匿名自填方式收集資料,包括基本資料、「愛滋病及肝炎知識量表」、「對毒癮者認知態度量表」及「緝捕毒癮者之工作經驗量表」。結果:說明會共745位警察參與,有效問卷為467份(回收率為62.7%)。研究發現警察主動積極者超過半數(56%),無意願參與清潔針具計畫者只有19人(4.3%)。相較無意願參與者,預測警察主動積極配合清潔針具計畫的因素為愛滋病及肝炎知識的得分較高(OR,1.27;95%CI, 1.07-1.51; p<0.01)、與毒癮者共處態度較自在(OR, 1.24; 95%CI, 1.06-1.45; p<0.01)、年齡較長(OR, 1.12, 95%CI, 1.02-1.22; p<0.05)、對毒癮者個人態度傾向其行為是有害的且危害健康(OR, 0.88; 95%CI, 0.78-0.99; p<0.05)以及被嫌犯血液噴濺的經驗較少(OR, 0.44;95%CI, 0.21-0.90; p<0.05)。結論:建議衛生主管機關應對警察加強宣導愛滋病/肝炎、藥物濫用/成癮及毒癮愛滋減害計畫相關的知識,並教導基層警察意外曝觸血/體液的預防措施、後續處理及追蹤的重要,以期提高警察主動積極參與清潔針具計畫的意願。
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to investigate the factors associated with the willingness of policemen to participate in needle exchange programs in Taiwan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among policemen who attended an introductory program about needle exchange programs in seven counties of southern Taiwan. Anonymous, voluntary questionnaires were distributed to the policemen. These included scales for assessing knowledge and attitude toward HIV and hepatitis, attitudes toward injection drug users (IDUs), and experiences during drug crackdowns. Results: A total of 745 policemen attended introductory programs. Of the 467 respondents (62.7% of the survey sample), fifty-six percent of the policmen (n=247) were willing to actively participate in the needle exchange programs. Compared to the unwilling participants, policemen willing to actively participate in the needle exchange programs: had higher scores on knowledge of HIV and hepatitis (OR, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.07-1.51; p<0.01), felt comfortable being with IDUs (OR, 1.24; 95%CI, 1.06-1.45; p<0.01), were older (OR, 1.12, 95%CI, 1.02-1.22; p<0.05), had a negative attitude toward IDUs (OR, 0.88 ; 95%CI, 0.78-0.99; p<0.05), and experienced fewer episodes of splattering by suspect’s blood (OR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.21-0.90; p<0.05). Conclusions: It is important for policemen to improve their knowledge about HIV and hepatitis, and about ways to prevent occupational exposure to bloodborne transmitted viruses. A comprehensive and effective post-exposure protocol is essential in order to minimize the risk of occupational bloodborne viral infections for policemen and to enhance their willingness to actively participate in needle exchange programs.
期刊論文
1.Yang CH, Yang SY, Shen MH, Kuo HS.(2008)。The changing epidemiology of prevalent diagnosed HIV infections in Taiwan, 1984-2005。Int J Drug Policy,19,317-23。  new window
2.Cooper H, Moore L, Gruskin S, Krieger N.(2005)。The impact of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors' ability to practice harm reduction: a qualitative study。Soc Sci Med,61,673-84。  new window
3.DeBeck K, Wood E, Zhang R, Tyndall M, Montaner J, Kerr T.(2008)。Police and public health partnerships: evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver’s supervised injection facility。Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy,3,11。  new window
4.Hammett, Theodore、Zunyou Wu、Tien DucTran、David Stephens、Sheena Sullivan、Liu Wei(2008)。‘Social evils’ and harm reduction: the evolving policy environment for human immunodeficiency virus prevention among injection drug users in China and Vietnam。Addiction,103,137-145。  new window
5.Rhodes T, Platt L, Sarang A, Vlasov A, Mikhailova L, Monaghan G.(2006)。Street policing, injecting drug use and harm reduction in a Russian city: a qualitative study of police perspectives。J Urban Health,83,911-25。  new window
6.Ruefli T, Rogers SJ.(2004)。How do drug users define their progress in harm reduction programs? Qualitative research to develop user-generated outcomes。Harm Reduct J,1,8。  new window
7.Strathdee SA, Patrick DM, Archibald CP, et al.(1997)。Social determinants predict needle- sharing behaviour among injection drug users in Vancouver, Canada。Addiction,92,1339-47。  new window
8.Wood E, Kerr T, Small W, Jones J, Schechter MT, Tyndall MW.(2003)。The impact of a police presence on access to needle exchange programs。J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr,34,116-8。  new window
9.Wood E, Tyndall MW, Spittal PM, et al.(2002)。Needle exchange and difficulty with needle access during an ongoing HIV epidemic。Int J Drug Policy,13,95-102。  new window
10.莊弘毅、劉碧隆、余秀娟、鄭金朋、王美綺(2006)。高雄縣政府衛生局「清潔針具交換計畫」受刑人需求及意願調查。疫情調查,22,546-55。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳佳伶、史麗珠、黃翠咪等(2008)。桃園地區清潔針具減害計畫的第一年執行情況及成效。疫情調查,24,130-47。  延伸查詢new window
12.毛琳文、柯乃熒、趙曉秋、李欣純、柯文謙、李玉雲(2005)。南部某醫學中心1994-2003接受愛滋病免費篩檢者之HIV盛行率及其危險因子。感染控制雜誌,15,69-80。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hu SW, Lai HR, Liao PH.(2004)。Comparing dental students' knowledge of and attitudes toward hepatitis B virus-, hepatitis C virus-, and HIV-infected patients in Taiwan。AIDS Patient Care STDS,18,587-93。  new window
14.余伍洋、朱清月、陳明招、楊寬弘、林清華(1994)。精神科護理人員對藥癮、酒癮、精神病患者認知態度之比較。公共衛生,21,23-30。  延伸查詢new window
15.馬先芝、王文玲、陳政惠、吳怡慧(2004)。警務人員愛滋病防治教育成效研究。感染控制雜誌,14,161-70。  延伸查詢new window
16.Lorentz J, Hill L, Samimi B.(2000)。Occupational needlestick injuries in a metropolitan police force。Am J Prev Med,18,146-50。  new window
17.Sonder GJ, Bovee LP, Coutinho RA, Baayen D, Spaargaren J, van den Hoek A.(2005)。Occupational exposure to bloodborne viruses in the Amsterdam police force, 2000-2003。Am J Prev Med,28,169-74。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE