紮根理論與質性研究：調和觀點__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	紮根理論與質性研究：調和觀點
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	賽明成／陳建維
作者(外文)：	Shai, Ming-chen／Chen, Chien-wei
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	49:1
頁次：	頁1-28
主題關鍵詞：	紮根理論；方法論；譯碼典範；情境矩陣；結果矩陣；Grounded theory；Methodological grounds；Coding paradigm；Conditional matrix；Conesquential matrix
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:5 共同引用:0 點閱:317

長久以來，質性研究遭受過於主觀與不夠嚴謹的批評。紮根理論因應這樣的氛圍而生，紮根理論之研究途徑企圖藉由發展系統性的分析模式以理解「過程」、「情境」及「行動」等概念，並對上述批判作出反駁。然而，因為Strauss 與Corbin 兩位原作者在論述上的衝突，開啟了一連串對於概念性與方法論上的爭辯與困惑。因此，本文企圖重新審視紮根理論的不同途徑以便釐清其認識論上的矛盾。同時，本文建議以不同「情境」作為驅動個人行動的主要論述，以便對「譯碼典範」作出修正。最後，我們對Strauss 與Corbin 的「條件／結果矩陣」作出修正並提出新的矩陣分析模式，以解釋不同「情境」、「行動」及「分析層級」彼此的連結與互動。

以文找文

Qualitative research has been criticized for the lack of objectivity and scientific rigor. In response to such criticism, grounded theory emerged as a philosophical and analytical approach to studying the process, action, and context of social phenomena. Nevertheless, the controversy between Strauss and Corbin, the founders of grounded theory, has provoked never-ending academic debates. Confusions are inevitably derived respectively from both theoretical foundations and methodological applications. This research is to clarify the epistemological ambivalence involved in the use of grounded theory. It intends to reconcile the seemingly conflicting viewpoints of different grounded theory schools by revisiting diverse philosophical positions of these schools and revising the “coding paradigm” for analyzing the contexts that drive human actions. Accordingly, a new “conditional/consequential matrix”, as opposed to Strauss and Corbin’s, is proposed to explain the connections and interactions among various contexts, actions, and micro-mess-macro levels of analysis, helping us generate propositions and build theories.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Glaser, Charles L.(2004)。When Are Arms Races Dangerous? Rational versus Suboptimal Arming。International Security，28(4)，44-84。
2.	Crook, C. W.、Kumar, R. L.(1998)。Electronic Data Interchange: A Multi-industry Investigation Using Grounded Theory。Information & Management，34(2)，75-89。
3.	Achen, Christopher H.、Snidal, Duncan(1989)。Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies。World Politics，41(2)，143-169。
4.	Singer, John David(1961)。The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations。World Politics，14(1)，77-92。
5.	Scott, Karen Wilson(2004)。Relating Categories in Grounded Theory Analysis: Using a Conditional Relationship Guide and Reflective Coding Matrix。The Qualitative Report，9(1)，113-126。
6.	Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。International Norm Dynamics and Political Change。International Organization，52(4)，887-917。
7.	Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review，14(4)，532-550。
8.	Bailey, Kenneth D.,(1972)。Polythetic Reduction of Monothetic Property Space。Sociological Methodology，Vol. 4，83~111。
9.	Boudreau, Marie-Claude and Daniel Robey,(2005)。Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective。Organization Science，Vol. 16, No. 1，3~19。
10.	George, Alexander L. and Richard Smoke,(1989)。Deterrence and Foreign Policy。World Politics，Vol. 41，170~182。
11.	Meernik, James,(1994)。Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Military Force。International Studies Quarterly，Vol. 38, No. 1，121~138。
12.	Melia, Kath M.,(1996)。Rediscovering Glaser。Qualitative Health Research，Vol. 6, No. 3，376。
13.	Orlikowski, Wanda J.,(1993)。CASE Tools as Organi zational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems,”。MIS Quarterly，Vol. 17, No. 3，309~340。
14.	Ostrom, Charles W. and Brian L. Job,(1986)。The President and the Political Use of Force。The American Political Science Review，Vol. 80, No. 2，541~556。
15.	Pettigrew, Andrew M.,(1990)。Longitudinal Field Res earch on Change: Theory and Practice。Organization Science，Vol. 1, No. 3，267~292。
16.	Rodon, Joan and Joan A. Pastor,(2007)。Applying Grounded Theory to Study the Implementation of an Inter-Organizational Information System。The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods，Vol. 5, No. 2，71~82。
17.	Smith, Steve,(2000)。Wendt's World。Review of International Studies，Vol. 26, No. 1，151~163。
18.	Walt, Stephen M.,(1988)。Testing Theories of Allia nce Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia。International Organization，Vol. 42, No. 2，275~316。
19.	Wong-Ming Ji, Diana J., and Wayne R. Millette,(2002)。Dealing with the Dynamic duo of Innovation and Inertia: The ‘in’- Theory of Organization Change,”。Organization Development Journal，Vol. 20, No. 1，36~52。
20.	Zagonn, Perez,(1999)。History, the Referent, and Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism Now。History and Theory，Vol. 38, No. 1，1~24。

會議論文
1.	Axelsson, Karin and Goran Goldkuhl,(2004)。Theory Modelling: Action Focus when Building aMulti-Grounded Theory25~33。
2.	Charmaz, Kathy, in Norman K.Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln eds. , Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry ThousandOaks, CA: Sage,(2003)。Grounded Theory: Objectivis t and Constructivist Methods。ThousandOaks, CA。249~291。
3.	Clarke, Adele E.,(2005)。Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn。London。
4.	Gould, Harry D.,(1998)。What is at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate。London。79~100。
5.	Goulding, Christina,(2002)。Grounded Theory: A Practical Guid e for Management, Business and Market Researchers。London。

圖書
1.	Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。
2.	Callinicos, Alex(2004)。The Revolutionary Ideas of Karl Marx。London, UK：Bookmarks。
3.	Mckinney, John C.(1966)。Constructive Typology and Social Theory。New York, NY：Appleton-Century-Crofts。
4.	Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith,(1991)。Explaining and Understanding International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
5.	Glaser, B. G.、Strauss, A. L.(1967)。Grounded Theory。New York：Aldine。
6.	Jervis, Robert(1978)。Perception and Misperception in International Politics。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。
7.	Jackson, Robert、Sorensen, Georg(2003)。Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches。New York。
8.	Lofland, J.、Lofland, L. H.(1995)。Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。
9.	Yin, R. K.(1989)。Case Study Research--Design and Method。Newburry Park, Calif：Sage Publications。
10.	Silverman, David(2000)。Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook。London：Sage Publications。
11.	Bryman, Alan(1988)。Quantity and Quality in Social Research。London：Unwin Hyman Publications：Routledge。
12.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。
13.	Strauss, A.(1987)。Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist。Cambridge University Press。
14.	Walt, Stephen M.(1987)。The Origins of Alliances。Cornell University Press。
15.	Pye, Lucian W.(1981)。The Dynamics of Chinese Politics。Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain Publishers, Inc.。
16.	Charmaz, Kathy(2006)。Constructing grounded theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis。Sage Publications。
17.	Lane, Fintan(1997)。The Origins of Modern Irish Socialism, 1881-1896。Cork University Press。
18.	George, Alexander L.、Bennett, Andrew(2005)。Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences。MIT Press。
19.	Glaser, Barney G.(1978)。Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory。Sociology Press。
20.	Barton, Allen H.,(1955)。The Concept of Property-Space in Social Research。The Language of Social Research。London。
21.	Bluff, Rosalind,(2005)。Grounded Theory: the Methodology。Qualitative Research in Health Care。New York。
22.	Busky, Donald F.,(2000)。Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey。Westport, Conn.。
23.	Davis, James W.,(2000)。Threats and Promises: The Pursui t of International influence。Baltimore。
24.	Glaser, Barney,(1992)。Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis。Mill Valley, CA。
25.	Govier, Trudy,(1987)。Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation。Dordrecht, Holland。
26.	Lazarfeld, Paul F. and Morris Rosenberg eds. ,(1955)。The Language of Social Research。London。
27.	Midlarsky, Manus I.,(1975)。On War: Political Violence in the International System。New York。
28.	Schutz, Alfred, Maurice A. Natanson, and H. L. Van Breda（ eds.）(1990)。Collected Papers 1: TheProblem of Social Reality。Netherlands。
29.	Solomon, Herbert,(1961)。Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction。Stanford, Calif.。
30.	Stevens, Richard,(1974)。James and Husserl: The Foundations of Meaning。Martinus Nijhoff。
31.	Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin,(1990)。The Basics of Qualitative Analysis: Grounded TheoryProcedures and Techniques。Thousand Oaks, CA。
32.	Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin,(1998)。The Basics of Qualitative Analysis: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques。Thousand Oaks, CA。
33.	Wallace, Michael David,(1973)。War and the Rank among Nations。Lexington, MA。
34.	Wilson, Edmund(2003)。To the Finland Station。New York：The New York Review of Books。

圖書論文
1.	Kemmis, Stephen、McTaggart, Robin(2000)。Participatory action research。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。
2.	Adler, Emanuel(2002)。Constructivism and International Relations。Handbook of International Relations。Sage。
3.	Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, J. M.(1994)。Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	園區型文創企業之動態能力研究
2.	災害防救公務人員協力職能初探
3.	NVivo 10在學校行政質性研究之運用：以「校長處理學校人情世故之訪談」一案為例
4.	教育行政領域應用紮根理論研究方法之分析
5.	NVivo 9.1是質性研究的萬靈丹或科學怪物？
6.	古巴飛彈危機：外交信息傳遞觀點

1.	族群與知識正義：臺灣客家與原住民族學科建制發展之比較
2.	國民小學初任校長領導行為及其影響因素之研究
3.	探究國小輔導實務工作中之教師諮詢執行經驗 —雙向現象場視框之觀照
4.	治理系統之研究－以全國新住民火炬計畫為例
5.	國民小學英語教師教學施為之研究:結構與施為的觀點

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫