:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Students's Perceptions of GTA Instruction of the English Listening Lab
書刊名:英語教學
作者:周惠那
作者(外文):Chou, Cindy Huey-nah
出版日期:2009
卷期:33:4
頁次:頁35-83
主題關鍵詞:Graduate teaching assistantsEnglish language laboratoriesStudent evaluation of teacher performance研究生助教英聽實習教學評量
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:54
放眼許多歐美國家,特別美國大學依賴研究生助教擔任基礎課程與實習課的教學工作日以俱增;同樣地,近來台灣各大專院校因教育部獎勵教學卓越以提昇教學品質及競爭力之故,積極培訓研究生擔任教學助理已經成為計畫中極為重要之方案。因此,本研究透過量化之教學評鑑量表及質化之大學生訪談兩項研究方法收集完整資料,探討大學生對英聽實習研究生教學助教的看法及評鑑。研究結果指出學生對於研究生教學助教上英聽實習課的五大看法(教學方法與策略、英聽教室操作技巧、英語能力、課程設計、及GTA角色),也發現學生滿意度最高的為教學助教之教學表現。本研究結論對於研究生助教負責大學部課程的教學現況提供深入與建設性的建議,相信將有助於提升研究生助教訓練品質、研究生授課與英語能力雙方面專業發展、及英語學習效率。
An increasing amount of undergraduate instruction is undertaken by graduate students working as teaching assistants (GTAs) in higher education institutes worldwide. Likewise, more colleges and universities in Taiwan have also started involving GTAs in their effort of enhancing excellence in teaching. Therefore, this study aims at examining GTAs’ instruction of the English listening lab from the undergraduate students’ perspective. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through student interviews and a survey questionnaire. Five major themes were derived from analysis of the interview transcripts. In addition, the questionnaire survey results indicated that the GTAs’ teaching performance was rated higher than course design and student learning by the participating undergraduate students. This study was concluded by proposing suggestions for GTAs’ pedagogical, English, and lab skills training. Findings of this study will have implications for and significant contributions to GTA training programs in Taiwan and in other EFL contexts.
期刊論文
1.Dörnyei, Zoltán、Csizer, Kata(1988)。Ten commandments for motivating language learners: results of an empirical study。Language Teaching Research,2(3),203-229。  new window
2.Stepp-Greany, J.(2002)。Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium。Language, Learning & Technology,6(1),165-180。  new window
3.林克忠、劉榮森、蔡佩倫、吳菁宜(20071200)。研究生助教教學提升方案成效的初步分析。醫學教育,11(4),275-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Horwitz, E. K.(1996)。Even teachers get the blues: Recognizing and alleviating language teachers' feelings of foreign language anxiety。Foreign Language Annals,29(3),365-372。  new window
5.Lavine, Roberta Z.(1992)。Rediscovering the audio language laboratory: Learning through communicative tasks。Hispania,75(5),1360-1367。  new window
6.Smith, E. A.(2004)。Differences in attitudes, experiences, and success between delivering and receiving site students in interactive television foreign language classes。Dissertation Abstracts International,64(10),3577。  new window
7.French, Donald、Russell, Connie(2002)。Do Graduate Teaching Assistants Benefit from Teaching Inquiry-Based Laboratories?。Bioscience,52(11),1036-1041。  new window
8.Goodlad, S.(1997)。Responding to the Perceived Training Needs of Graduate Teaching Assistants。Studies in Higher Education,22,83-92。  new window
9.Harding, E.、Rodgers, T.(1985)。Language Laboratories。NASSP Bulletin,69(480),21-29。  new window
10.Koerner, Richard J.(1988)。Language Laboratory in the High School: Dinosaur or Valuable Tool for the Teaching of Foreign Languages?。CALICO Journal,6(1),82-86。  new window
11.Bomotti, Sally Smith(1994)。Teaching assistant attitudes toward college teaching。The Review of Higher Education,17(4),371-393。  new window
12.鄭雪娥、李世忠(2001)。Development of University Teaching Assistant Training Program: A case study on training of TA of Tamkang University calculus courses。教育資料與圖書館學,38(4),439-452。  new window
13.Cullen, Richard(2001)。The use of lesson transcripts for developing teachers' classroom language。System,29(1),27-43。  new window
14.Danaher, Mike、Danaher, Patrick(1998)。The benefits of language laboratories for learning Japanese as a foreign language。Language Learning Journal,18,50-55。  new window
15.Davis, Stephen F.、Kring, Jason P.(2001)。A Model For Training And Evaluating Graduate Teaching Assistants。College Student Journal,35(1),45-51。  new window
16.Feezel, J. D.、Meyers, S. A.(1997)。Assessing graduate teaching assistant communication concerns。Communication Quarterly,45(3),110-124。  new window
17.Feinman, J. M.(1991)。Teaching assistants。Journal of Legal Education,41,269-288。  new window
18.Luo, Jiali、Bellows, Laurie H.、Grady, Marilyn L.(2000)。Classroom Management Issues for Teaching Assistants。Research in Higher Education,41(3),353-383。  new window
19.Luo, Jiali、Grady, Marilyn L.、Bellows, Laurie H.(2001)。Instructional Issues for Teaching Assistants。Innovative Higher Education,25(3),209-230。  new window
20.Norris, Timothy(1991)。Nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants and student performance。Research in Higher Education,32(4),433-448。  new window
21.Park, Chris.(2002)。Neither fish nor fowl? The perceived benefits and problems of using Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to teach undergraduate students。Higher Education Review,35(1),50-62。  new window
22.Park, Chris.(2004)。The graduate teaching assistant. (GTA): lessons from North American experience。Teaching in Higher Education,9(3),349-361。  new window
23.Pratt, Daniel D.(1991)。Conceptions of self within China and the United states: Contrasting foundations for adult education。International Journal of intercultural Relations,15(3),285-310。  new window
24.Rose, P. J.(2003)。Listening skills and language labs: A case study of a college-level ESL program。Dissertation Abstracts International,64(12),4479。  new window
25.Rubin, Donald L.(1992)。Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants。Research in Higher Education,33(4),511-531。  new window
26.Shannon, David M.、Twale, Darla J.、Moore, Matthew S.(1998)。TA Teaching Effectiveness: The Impact of Training and Teaching Experience。The Journal of Higher Education,69(4),440-466。  new window
27.Twale, Darla J.、Shannon, David M.、Moore, Matthew S.(1997)。NGTA and IGTA Training and Experience: Comparisons Between Self-Ratings and Undergraduate Student Evaluations。Innovative Higher Education,22(1),61-77。  new window
28.Young, R.(1990)。Curriculum Renewal in Training Programs for International Teaching Assistants。Journal of Intensive English Studies,4,59-77。  new window
29.Hoekje, Barbara、Williams, Jessica。Communicative competence and the dilemma of international teaching assistant education。TESOL Quarterly,26(2),243-269。  new window
圖書
1.Ur, Penny(1996)。A course in language teaching: practice and theory。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Dornyei, Z.(2001)。Teaching and researching motivation。Harlow, UK:Longman/Pearson Education。  new window
3.Medgyes, P.(1994)。The non-native teacher。London:Macmillan。  new window
4.Harmer, Jeremy(2001)。The practice of English language teaching。Harlow, Essex:Pearson Education Limited。  new window
5.Raffini, J. P.(1996)。150 ways to increase intrinsic motivation in the classroom。Boston:Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Brown, H. Douglas(2001)。Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy。White plains, NY:Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
7.Riverj, W. M .(1987)。Interactive language teaching。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari K.(1992)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
9.Deci, Edward L.(1975)。Intrinsic Motivation。Plenum Press。  new window
10.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain。Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain。New York。  new window
11.Gower, R.、Phillips, D.、Walters, S.(2005)。Teaching Practice: A Handbook for Teachers in Training。Teaching Practice: A Handbook for Teachers in Training。OXford。  new window
12.Howatt, Anthony P. R.、Widdowson, H.(2004)。A History of English Language Teaching。A History of English Language Teaching。Oxford。  new window
13.Bailey, K. M.、Pialorsi, F.、Zukowski、Faust, J.(1984)。Foreign Teaching Assistants in U. S. Universities。Foreign Teaching Assistants in U. S. Universities。Washington, D. C.。  new window
14.Bauer, G.(1996)。Addressing special considerations when working with international teaching assistants。Working Effectively with Graduate Assistants。Thousand Oaks. CA.。  new window
15.Chism, N.(1993)。How faculty develop teaching expertise。Faculty as Teachers: Taking Stock of What we Know。Pennsylvania State。  new window
16.Davies, Paul、Pearse, Eric(2000)。Success in English Teaching。Success in English Teaching。New York。  new window
17.Davis, W. E.(1991)。International teaching assistants and cultural differences: Student evaluations of rapport, approachability, enthusiasm and fairness。Preparing the Professoriate of Tomorrow to Teach: Selected Readings in TA Training。Iowa。  new window
18.Fisher, M.(1985)。Rethinking the foreign TA problem。Strengthening the Teaching Assistant Faculty。San Francisco。  new window
19.Nyquist, Jody D.、Wulff, Donald H.(1996)。Working Effectively with Graduate Assistants。Working Effectively with Graduate Assistants。Thousand Oaks. CA.。  new window
20.Rivers, W. M.(1970)。Teaching Foreign-Languages Skills。Teaching Foreign-Languages Skills。Chicago。  new window
21.Smith, Jan.、Meyers, Colleen M.、Burkhalter, Amy J.(1992)。Communicate: Strategies For International Teaching Assistants。Communicate: Strategies For International Teaching Assistants。New Jersey。  new window
其他
1.Brenes, César A. Navas(2006)。The language laboratory and the EFL course。  new window
2.Center for Support of Teaching and Learning(1987)。Student Rating of Teaching Effectiveness: Using the CSTL item bank to create your own form。  new window
3.Lorge, Sarah W.(1964)。Language Laboratory Research Studies in New York City High Schools: A Discussion of the Program and the Findings,New York。  new window
4.Marquart, J. M.,Li, S.,Zercher, C.(1997)。Making the Whole More than the Sum of the Parts: Challenges in a Mixed Method Study of Inclusion,New York。  new window
5.教育廣播電台(2007)。暨大、東海展現教學助理制度成果,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(2001)。University Senate Committee on Instruction, Curriculum and Advising。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE