2008年總統大選結束，國內的政治情勢產生了前所未有的劇烈轉變。隨著政治立場的更迭，過往被忽視的陸生來台政策也重新浮上檯面。本文擬針對在兩岸政治、經濟與文化脈絡下，運用Kingdon之時勢潮流架構來探討陸生來台政策的問題潮流、政策潮流和政治潮流分別為何以促使該政策重新納入政府的施政內容中，與國家在此政策中之意識型態如何形成與實踐？ 研究發現，陸生來台政策無法用階段理論或是理性的統合結構來描述，因為其匯合的過程中缺乏秩序性與一致性的邏輯推演關係，呈現出一種非理性且斷裂的政策制定狀態。當透過多方說法與相關公聽會的檢證，政府單位也逐漸察覺所謂的「三贏」是存在著許多矛盾與失周的地方，隨著「三限六不」等限制被提出後，陸生來台之實際政策目標也隨之與教育和國際學生流動趨勢逐漸脫軌。陸生來台政策產生後，相關的論述場域彷彿像是一個競技場，二元對立論述所持象徵系統結構，彼此互不相容，涇渭分明，並以各式各樣的語言論述鞏固自己的立場。

After the presidential election in 2008, there have been some dramatic changes of political circumstances in Taiwan. With the political shift, the Bill to allow Chinese students into Taiwan universities neglected in the past has been getting back on stage recently. The purpose of this article is to illuminate the policy making process of the Bill by Kingdon’s multiple stream framework. The research questions guiding this article are: (1) What are the problem stream, policy stream, and political stream in cross-strait contexts? (2) Why does the issue once again gain government’s attention? (3) How does the statist ideology form and practice in this policy making process? According to findings, there is no way to describe the policy by neither staged theories nor rational frameworks due to the lack of orderliness and consistence in policy making process. In addition, after checking by public hearings and public opinions, the government also finds some contradictory and inconsiderate statements. Moreover, the policy goals are departed from trends of international student flows as many restrictions were brought up. Since the policy appeared, the two opposite parties are incompatible as fire and water and consolidate each position by all different kinds of discourses.