臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論離婚後父母對未成年子女權利義務之行使負擔：美國法上子女最佳利益原則的發展與努力方向
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：李立如 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Li-ju
出版日期：2010
卷期：40:3
頁次：頁779-828
主題關鍵詞：子女最佳利益；友善父母條款；共同監護；主要照顧者原則；過去照顧模式；The best interest of the child；Friendly parent provision；Joint custody；Primary caretaker preference；Past care-taking standard
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:56
期刊論文
1.Schneider, Elizabeth M.(1986)。The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement。New York University Law Review，61，589-653。  new window
2.雷文玫(19990400)。以「子女最佳利益」之名：離婚後父母對未成年子女權利義務行使與負擔之研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，28(3)，245-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉宏恩(19971200)。夫妻離婚後「子女最佳利益」之酌定--從英美法實務看我國民法親屬編新規定之適用。軍法專刊，43(12)，24-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Mnookin, Robert H.、Kornhauser, Lewis(1979)。Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce。Yale Law Journal，88(5)，950-997。  new window
5.Foster, H. H.,、Freed, D. J.(1972)。A bill of rights for children。Family Law Quarterly，6, 3，343-376。  new window
6.Gagnon, A. G.(1992)。Ending mandatory divorce mediation for battered women。Harvard Women’s Law Journal，15, 1，272-294。  new window
7.Gardner, R. A.(1982)。Joint custody is not for everyone。Family Advocate，5，7-9。  new window
8.Gibbons, K.(2006)。The ties that bind: Why Texas should adopt a presumption that relocation is not in the best interest of the child。Texas Wesleyan Law Review，12, 2，555-584。  new window
9.Graham, K.(2001)。How the ALI child custody principles help eliminate gender and sexual orientation bias from child custody determinations。Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy，8, 1:，323-331。  new window
10.Greenberg, J. G.(2005)。Domestic violence and the danger of joint custody presumptions。Northern Illinois University Law Review，25, 3，403-431。  new window
11.Grillo, T.(1991)。The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women。Yale Law Journal，100, 6，1545-1610。  new window
12.Hazlewood, M. E.(2004)。The new Texas Ad Litem Statues: Is it really protecting the best interest of minor children?。St. Mary’s Law Journal，35, 4，1035-1702。  new window
13.Henry, R. K.(1994)。“Primary caretaker”: Is it a ruse?。Family Advocate，17:，53-56。  new window
14.Jacobs, S. B.(1997)。The hidden gender bias behind “the best interest of the child” standard in custody decisions.。Georgia State University Law Review，13, 3，845-901。  new window
15.Johnston, J. R.(2005)。Children of divorce who reject a parent and refuse visitation: Recent research and social policy implications for the alienated child。Family Law Quarterly，38, 4，757-775。  new window
16.Kelly, J. B.(2002)。Psychological and legal interventions for parents and children in custody and access disputes: Current research and practice。Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law，10(1)，129-163。  new window
17.Kelly, J. B.(2005)。Developing beneficial parenting plan models for children following separation and civorce。Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers，19, 2，237-254。  new window
18.Levmore, S.(1998)。Joint custody and strategic behavior。Indiana Law Journal，73, 2，429-439。  new window
19.Lidman, R. C.,、Hollingsworth, B. R.(1998)。The guardian ad litem in the child custody cases: The contours of our judicial system stretched beyond recognition。George Mason Law Review，6, 2，255-306。  new window
20.Artis, Julie E.(2004)。Judging the best interests of the child: Judge's accounts of the tender years doctrine。Law & Society Review，38(4)，769-806。  new window
21.Barlow, B.(2005)。Divorce child custody mediation: In order to form a more perfect disunion?。Cleveland State Law Review，52, 4，499-525。  new window
22.Bartlett, K. T.(1999)。Child custody in the 21st century: How the American Law Institute proposes to achieve predictability and still protect the individual child’s best interests.。Willamette Law Review，35, 3，467-483。  new window
23.Bartlett, K. T.(2000)。Comparing race and sex discrimination in custody cases。Hofstra Law Review，28, 4，883-894。  new window
24.Bartlett, K. T.(2002)。U.S. custody law and trends in the context of the ALI principles of the law of family dissolution.。Virginia Jour-nal of Social Policy & the Law，10, 1，5-53。  new window
25.Blond, B. S.(1984)。In the child’s best interests—a better way: The case for presumptive joint custody in Missouri.。University of Mis-souri-Kansas City Law Review，52, 4，567-597。  new window
26.Bow, J. N.,、Quinnell, F. A.(2002)。A critical review of child custody evaluation reports。Family Court Review，40, 2，164-176。  new window
27.Boxer-Macomber, L.(2003)。Revisiting the impact of California’s mandatory custody mediation program on victims of domestic violence through a feminist positionality lens。St. Thomas Law Review，15, 4，883-906。  new window
28.Brinig, M. F.,、Buckley, F. H.(1988)。Joint custody: Bonding and monitoring theories.。Indiana Law Journal，73, 2，393-427。  new window
29.Bryant, W. M.(2002)。Solomon’s new sword: Tennessee’s parenting plan, the role of attorneys, and the care perspective.。Tennessee Law Review，70(1)，221-249。  new window
30.Catania, F. J. Jr.(2001)。Learning from the process of decision: The parenting plan。Brigham Young University Law Review，2001, 3，857-889。  new window
31.Cohen, I. M.(1988)。Postdecree litigation—Is joint custody to blame。Family and Conciliation Courts Review，36, 1，41-53。  new window
32.Crippen, G.(1990)。Stumbling beyond best interests of the child: Re-examining child custody standard—Setting in the wake of Min-nesota’s four year experiment with the primary caretaker preference.。Minnesota Law Review，75, 2，427-503。  new window
33.Crippen, G. L.,、Stuhlman, S. M.(2001)。Minnesota’s alternatives to primary caretaker placements: Too much of a good thing?。William Mitchell Law Review，28, 2，677-695。  new window
34.Dore, M. K.(2004)。The friendly parent concept: A flawed factor for child custody。Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law，6, 1，41-56。  new window
35.Ducote, R.(2002)。Guardians ad litem in private custody litigation: The case for abolition。Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law，3, 2，106-151。  new window
36.Emery, Robert E.、Laumann-Billings, Lisa、Waldron, Mary C.、Sbarra, David A.、Dillon, Peter(2001)。Child custody mediation and litigation: Custody, contact, and coparenting 12 years after initial dispute resolution。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，69(2)，323-332。  new window
37.Fineman, M.(1988)。Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decisionmaking.。Harvard Law Review，101, 4，727-774。  new window
38.Fischer, Karla、Vidmar, Neil、Ellis, Rene(1993)。The culture of battering and the role of mediation in domestic violence cases。SMU Law Review，46(4)，2117-2174。  new window
39.Martindale, D. A.(2007)。Model standard of practice for child custody evaluation。Family Court Review，45, 1，70-90。  new window
40.Mercer, K. L.(1988)。A content analysis of judicial decision-making —How judges use the primary caretaker standard to make a custody determination。William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law，5, 1，1-148。  new window
41.Peskind, S. N.(2005)。Determining the undeterminable: The best in-terest of the child standard as an imperfect but necessary guide-post to determine child custody。Northern Illinois University Law Review，25, 3，449-482。  new window
42.Pollet, Susan L.、Lombreglia, Melissa(2008)。A nationwide survey of mandatory parent education。Family Court Review，46(2)，375-394。  new window
43.Ramsey, S. H.(2001)。Constructing parenthood for stepparents: Parents by estoppel and de facto parents under the American Law In-stitute’s principles of the law of family dissolution.。Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy，8, 1，285-301。  new window
44.Schafran, L. H.(1990)。Gender and justice: Florida and the nation。Florida Law Review，42, 1，181-208。  new window
45.Schepard, A.(2005)。Mental health evaluations in child custody disputes。Family Court Review，43, 2，187-190。  new window
46.Schulman, J.、Pitt, V.(1982)。Second thoughts on joint custody: Analysis of legislation and its implications for women and children。Golden Gate University Law Review，12, 3，538-43。  new window
47.Singer, J. B.,、Reynolds, W. L.(1998)。A dissent on joint custody。Maryland Law Review，47, 2，497-523。  new window
48.Ver Steegh, N.(2005)。Differentiating types of domestic violence: Implications for child custody。Louisiana Law Review，65(4)，1379-1431。  new window
49.Wagner, D. M.(2001)。Balancing “parents are” and “parents do” in the supreme court’s constitutionalized family law: Some implica-tions for the ALI proposals on de facto parenthood.。Brigham Young University Law Review，2001, 3，1175-1187。  new window
50.Wallace, M. H.(2007)。Child support savings account: An innovated approach to child support enforcement。North Carolina Law Review，85, 4，1155-1192。  new window
51.Williams, G. I.(2005)。Looking at joint custody through the language and attitude of attorneys。Justice System Journal，26, 1，1-31。  new window
52.Woodhouse, B. B.(2002)。Talking about children’s rights in judicial custody and visitation decision-making。Family Law Quarterly，36, 1，105-133。  new window
53.Yaeger, K.(2005)。An examination or relocation law in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island: Successful trends toward deter-mining the best interests of the child.。Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy，10(2)，153-172。  new window
54.Zapata, Raymon(2003)。Child custody in Texas and the best interest standard: In the best interest of whom?。Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Minority Issues，6(1)，197-217。  new window
55.Kay, H. H.(2002)。No-fault divorce and child custody: Chilling out the gender wars.。Family Law Quarterly，36, 1，27-47。  new window
研究報告
1.彭南元(2007)。〈祖父母訪視孫子女所引起之爭議──以爭議解決觀點評析美國最高法院Troxel v. Granville一案之判決〉。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李宏文(2004)。論子女最佳利益原則(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fineman, Martha Albertson(1995)。The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies。Routledge。  new window
2.Maccoby, E. E.,、Mnookin, R. H.(1992)。Dividing the child—Social and legal dilemmas of custody。Cambridge, MA。  new window
3.高鳳仙(1985)。〈試評子女最高利益原則在美國監護法上之適用得失〉。《中美離婚法之比較研究》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.American Law Institute.(2002)。Principles of the Law of Family Disso-lution: Analysis and Recommendations。New York:。  new window
5.Mason, M. A.(1994)。From father’s property to children’s rights: The history of child custody in the United States.。New York。  new window
6.Mason, M. A.(1999)。The custody wars: Why children are losing the legal battle and what we can do about it。New York:。  new window
7.Murray, T. H.(1996)。The worth of a child。Berkeley, CA。  new window
8.Rhode, D. L.(1989)。Justice and gender: Sex discriminations and the law。Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳昭如(2007)。發現受害者或是製造加害者？初探女性主義法學中的受害者政治。自由主義與新世紀臺灣。臺北：允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1283（臺灣：1267，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67886063
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上