一、中文文獻
(一)專書
丘宏達著,陳純一修訂(2012),現代國際法,修訂三版,台北:三民。
李太正(2014),家事事件法之理論與實務,台北:元照。
林沛君編著(2014),兒少人權,向前行--兒童權利公約逐條釋義,台北:展 翅協會。
林真美譯(2012),好心的國王 兒童權利之父--柯扎克的故事,台北:親子天下。
姜皇池(2015),國際公法導論(三版二刷),台北:新學林。姜世明(2012),家事事件法論,台北:元照。
陳向明(2016),社會科學質的研究,台北:五南。陳新民(2001),中華民國憲法釋論(修正四版),台北:三民。
監察院人權保障委員會(2014),2013年監察院人權工作實錄:第一冊公民與政治權利,台北:監察院。
監察院人權保障委員會(2014),2013年監察院人權工作實錄:第二冊經濟、社會與文化權利,台北:監察院。
瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞主編(2016),社會及行為科學研究法--質性研究法,台北:東華。
(二)專書論文
李建良(2014),論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序--國際條約與憲法解釋之關係的基礎課題,廖福特編,憲法解釋之理論與實務第八輯,中央研究 院法律學研究所,台北:新學林,頁175-275。林沛君(2016),第六章廣義表達意見之自由,收錄於施慧玲、陳竹上主編,兒童權利公約,台北:台灣新世紀文教基金會,頁125-146。
施慧玲(2004),子女本位之親子法,收錄於氏著:家庭、法律、社會論文集,台北:元照,頁203-219。施慧玲、張旭政(2003),論國家介入親權行使之法理基礎 – 以兒童人權為中心之論證基礎,收錄於2002年台灣人權報告,台北:台灣人權促進會,頁 203-219。
孫迺翊(2014),社會保障權,收錄於聯合國人權兩公約—公民與政治權利國際公約、經濟社會文化權利公約,台北:台灣新世紀文教基金會,頁393-410。
高玉泉、施慧玲(2016),兒童權利公約之歷史發展與台灣參與,收錄於施慧玲、陳竹上主編,兒童權利公約,台北:台灣新世紀文教基金會,頁1-27。
翁燕菁(2015),性別工作平等,收錄於張文貞主編,消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約,台北:台灣新世紀文教基金會,頁361-400。郭明政(2011)。「社會福利與社會保險」,收錄於《中華民國發展史.政治與 法制》(下),台北:聯經,頁313-352。張文貞(2009),憲法與國際人權法的匯流--兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐,收錄於憲法解釋之理論與實務第六輯(上冊),台北:中研院/元照,頁223-272。
傅崑成(2001),再論國際人權法在中華民國法律架構內的適用,收錄於:丘宏 達教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會,國際法論文集:丘宏達教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集,台北:三民,頁549-582。
鄧衍森(2006),人權理念在我憲法解釋之應用,載:社團法人台灣法學會主編,主權、憲法與台灣的未來,台北:元照,頁199-232。(三)期刊論文
王自雄(2010),人權兩公約之國內法化暨其施行法之實施--從國際法的內化與人權在我國憲政體制下之法律地位論起,台灣法學,第164期,頁113-122。
王秀文(2011),華勒斯《兒童》中的人物命名研究,淡江外語論叢,第18期,頁58-74。王曉丹(2006),談英國離婚法改革的發展 – 法政策、法理、法社會之探討,台大法學叢論,第35(5)期,頁163-208。余寬賜(1999),我國「條約締結法」之擬議,政治科學論叢,第10期,頁227-244。
沈冠伶(2013),家事非訟程序之關係人,月旦法學教室,第124期,頁39-51。
林沛君(2017),兒少「表意權」實質意涵的初探 - 以被安置兒少發聲的權利為中心,台灣人權學刊,第4卷第1期,頁73-96。林沛君(2016),人權公約匯入國內法律體系所面臨之課題--以實踐兒童權利公約之國際經驗為借鏡,國立中正大學法學集刊,第52期,頁161-219。林沛君(2015),由兒童權利公約檢視國內性剝削兒少安置處遇之法律規範--從保護客體蛻變為權利主體之典範移轉,憲政時代,第40卷第4期,頁 559-602。林沛君(2015),由聯合國兒童權利委員會第14號一般性意見重新檢視「子女最佳利益」,華岡法粹,第58期,2015年,頁127-160。林鈺雄(2014),2013年刑事程序法回顧:從國際人權公約內國法化的觀點出發,臺大法學論叢,第43卷特刊,頁1276-1677。施慧玲(1998),少年非行防治對策之新福利法制觀 – 以責任取向的少年發展權為中心,中正大學法學集刊,創刊號,頁199-231。施慧玲(2004),論我國兒童人權法制之發展--兼談落實『兒童權利公約之社 會運動,中正大學法學集刊,第14期,頁169-204。孫迺翊(2015),身心障礙者權利公約第8條第1項規定與身心障礙者權利估約適用問題初探,萬國法律,第204期,頁13-31。
洪遠亮(2011),子女利益及監護理論之新趨勢–從北院98年度婚字第244號判決談起,法學叢刊,222期,頁101-151。徐揮彥(2014),「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究,臺大法學論叢,第43卷 特刊,頁839-909。黃越欽(2002),國際勞工公約與憲法法院 – 兼論大法官釋字第373號,憲政時代,28卷,第3期,頁34-38。
郭明政(2007),社會法治國的司法建構─第六屆大法官解釋中與社會安全法制相關解釋之分析,憲政時代第33卷2期,頁187-220。郭明政(1994),法律在社會福利體系中之角色與任務,社區發展季刊,67期,頁75-87。
郭銘禮(2013),初次國家人權報告之撰寫與審查的初步檢討與展望,台灣人權學刊,第2卷第1期,頁73-105。陳怡凱(2014),國際法於我國內國法院之實踐,司法新聲,第104期,頁28-43。
張文貞(2012),演進中的法:一般性意見作為國際人權公約的權威解釋,臺灣人權學刊,1卷2期,頁25-43。彭淑華(2006),保護為名,權控為實? - 少年安置機構工作人員的觀點分析,東吳社會工作學報,15期,頁1-36。雷文玫(1999),以「子女最佳利益之名:離婚後父母對未成年子女權利義務行使與負擔之研究」,臺大法學論叢第28卷第3期,頁245-309。廖福特(2014),「公民與政治權利國際公約」國內法化之影響:最高法院死刑相關判決之檢視,臺大法學論叢,第43卷特刊,頁911-956。廖福特(2010),國際人權條約國內法化與地方自治體,台灣國際法季刊,第7卷2期,頁75-116。廖福特(2011),法院應否及如何適用《公民與政治權利國際公約》,台灣法學,163期,頁45-65。
廖福特(2014),司法審判於兩公約人權保障思維所面臨之挑戰─行政法院適用兩公約之檢視,法學叢刊,59卷2期,頁1-42。廖福特(2009),批准聯合國兩個人權公約及至制定施行法之評論,月旦法學雜誌,174期,頁223-229。劉定基(2013),議會至上與人大至上—從英國違憲審查的發展看中國違憲審查的未來,政大法學評論,135期,頁255-306。劉宏恩(2014),「離婚後子女監護案件『子女最佳利益原則』的再檢視---試評析2013年12月修正之民法1055條之1規定」,月旦法學,第234期,頁193-207。
鄧衍森(2010),人權保障的規範理論:序曲,台灣法學雜誌,第166期,頁123-130。
鄧學仁(2011),離婚後子女親權酌定之問題與對策,月旦法學雜誌,第191期,頁34-44。賴淳良(2017),性剝削保護安置事件(上),司法周刊,第1842期,頁2-3。
賴淳良(2017),性剝削保護安置事件(下),司法周刊,第1843期,頁23。
賴月蜜、林沛君、李姿佳、朱怡瑄、胡育瑄、溫筱雯(2015)。NPO推展程序監理人制度之行動研究-以現代婦女基金會雙專業團隊模式為例,東吳社會 工作學報,第29期,頁53-86。賴月蜜(2009),小娃兒進衙門-談司法與社工在「兒童出庭」的保護,社區發展季刊,128期,頁86-98(四)學位論文
林沛君(2012),機構安置之兒童及少年人權保障法制 – 以兒童國際人權公約及英國兒童法為借鏡,國際政治大學法律科際整合研究所碩士論文。馬若慈(2014),論兒童陳述意見之權利:以兒童權利公約為核心,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所。
黃逸柔(2012),離婚後親權人之決定與未成年子女最佳利益之研究,國立中正大學法律研究所碩士論文。
陳竹上(2007),離婚後未成年子女最佳利益之研究:福利國家與家庭角色的再思考,國立中正大學社會福利所博士論文。陳韋方(2012),夫妻離婚後親權人決定之研究 - 以子女最佳利益為中心之實務見解剖析,中國文化大學法律學系碩士論文。
陳嬿婷(2015),陪同兒少出庭社工之經驗初探 ─以監護權案件出庭為例,東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
彭怡萍(2014),監護權訪視調查中專業人員維護子女最佳利益之研究-以社工人員及程序監理人之觀點為中心,玄奘大學社會福利與社會工作學系碩士論 文。
(五)研討會論文
廖福特(2016),我國批准與履行國際人權條約之情況,論文發表於兒童權利公 約--首次國家報告發表記者會暨國際研討會,衛生福利部社會及家庭署。
陳毓文(2002),安置機構處遇計畫的轉銜,論文發表於財團法人勵馨社會福利 事業基金會「折翼天使的另類天堂 — 兒少安置機構現況與展望研討會」。
(六)研究計畫
施慧玲教授主持(廖宗聖副教授、陳竹上副教授協同主持)(2014),推動聯合國兒童權利公約國內法化期末報告,衛生福利部社會家庭署(兒童少年科)計 畫案。
陳隆志持(廖福特協同主持)(2003),國際人權公約國內法化之方法與策略,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。
(七)官方文件
行政院(2017),兒童權利公約首次國家報告,檔案連結:https://www.yoursaas.com/websites/30547540144657724502/docs/nationalreport .pdf。
中華民國(台灣)兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查會議結論性意見,檔案連結(2017):https://www.yoursaas.com/websites/30547540144657724502/docs/C01-CN.pdf 。
中華民國(台灣)兒童權利公約首次國家報告問題清單及政府回應,檔案連結:
https://www.yoursaas.com/websites/30547540144657724502/docs/QA01-CH.pdf。
(八)其他
中華民國(台灣)兒童權利公約首次國家報告--NGO報告資料庫連結:
http://www.crcreview.org.tw/。
二、英文
(一)專書
ALLEN, NICK (4th ed. 2005). MAKING SENSE OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Aust, Anthony (3rd ed. 2013). MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bainham, Andrew & Stephen Gilmore (4th ed. 2013). CHILDREN AND THE MODERN LAW. Bristol: Jordans.
Beatson, Jack. Grosz, Stephen. Hickman, Tom & Singh, Rabinder with Palmer,Stephanie (2008). HUMAN RIGHTS: JUDICIAL PROTECTION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. London : Sweet & Maxwell.
Brayne, Hugh & Carr, Helen (2010). LAW FOR SOCIAL WORKERS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BUTLER, IAN & DRAKEFORD, MARK (2005) SCANDAL, SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIAL WELFARE. NEW YORK: POLICY PRESS
Diduck, Alison & Kaganas, Felicity (3rd ed. 2013). FAMILY LAW, GENDER AND THE STATE – TEXT, CASES AND MATERIALS, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.
FORTIN, JANE (3rd ed. 2009). CHILDREN’S RIGHTS AND THE DEVELOPING LAW. CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
Hodgkin, Rachel & Nowell, Peter (4th ed. 2007). IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK FOR THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, Geneva: UNICEF.
Hoffman, David & Rowe, John (2d ed. 2006). HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UK: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998. Essex: Pearson Longman.
Kavanagh, Aileen (2009). CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kadushin, Alfred & Kadushin, Goldie (4th ed.1997). THE SOCIAL WORK INTERVIEW – A GUIDE FOR HUMAN SERVICE PROFESSIONALS, New York: Columbia University Press.
Lammy, Betten (1999). THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT: WHAT IT MEANS: THE INCORPORATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS INTO THE LEGAL ORDER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers.
MacDonald, Alistair (2011). THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD--LAW AND PRACTICE, Bristol: Jordan Publishing.
Mason, Mary Ann (1994). FROM FATHER’S PROPERTY TO CHILDREN’S RIGHTS--THE HISTORY OF CHILD CUSTODY IN THE UNITED STATES. New York, Columbia University Press.
O’Connell, Daniel P. (1971). INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR STUDENTS. London : Stevens & Sons.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)(2007), LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, VOL. I. New York:UN.
Oppenheim, Lassa (8th ed.1963). INTERNATIONAL LAW – A TREATISE, VOL. I – PEACE. London: Longman.
Parkes, Aisling (2013). CHILDREN AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW-THE RIGHT OF THE CHILD TO BE HEARD. Oxon: Routledge.
Steiner, H., Alston, P. & Goodman, R. (2007. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN CONTEXT - LAW, POLITICS, MORALS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thor Björgvinsson , Davíd (2015). A THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ANALYSIS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Van Bueren, Geraldine (1998). INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD.Dordrecht, The Netherlands : M. Nijhoff Publishers.
Veerman, Philip (1992). THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD AND THE CHANGING IMAGE OF CHILDHOOD, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: M. Nijhoff Publishers.
Wadham, John. Mountfield QC, Helen. Prochaska, Elizabeth & Brown, Christopher(6th ed. 2012). BLACKSTONE’S GUIDE TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Jane (2008). CHILD LAW FOR SOCIAL WORK. London: Sage.
Zander, Michael (4th ed. 1997). A BILL OF RIGHTS? London: Sweet & Maxwell.
(二)專書論文
Abramson, Bruce (2008). Article 2. The Right of Non-Discrimination, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp. 1-148.
Andreas L. Paulus (2009). Germany, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (David Sloss ed.), pp. 209-242.
Byrnes, A. & Renshaw, C. (2nd ed. 2014) Within the State, in INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, (D. Moeckli, S. Shah & S. Sivakumaran eds.), pp. 458-475.
Cantwell, Nigel (1992). The Origins, Development and Significance of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, in THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD: A GUIDE TO THE “TRAVAUS PRÉPARATOIRES” (Sharon Detrick (ed.), pp. 19-30.
Charney, Jonathan L. (2003) Commentary: Compliance With International Soft Law, in COMMITMENT AND COMPLIANCE: THE ROLE OF NON-BINDING NORMS IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM (Dinah Shelton, ed.), pp.115-118.
Counzens, Meda (2015). France, in LITIGATING THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD: THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE (Ton Liefaard & Jaap E. Doek eds.), pp.123-138.
DEMAUSE, LLOYD (2005). THE EVOLUTION OF CHILDHOOD, in CHILD WELFARE – MAJOR THEMES IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELFARE, VOL. 1: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES, (Nick Frost ed., 2005), pp.1-64.
Doek, Jaap (2006) Article 8: The Right to Preservation of Identity, and Article 9 The Right Not to Be Separated from His or Her Parents, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp.1-31.
Dubinsky, Paul R (2011). United States, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS: INCORPORATION, TRANSFORMATION, AND PERSUASION (Dinah Shelton, ed.), 631-659.
Eekelaar, John (2000). The End of an Era? in CROSS CURRENTS:FAMILY LAW AND POLICY IN UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND ( Sanford N. Katz ed.), pp.637-655.
Folz, Hans-Peter (2011) Germany, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS: INCORPORATION, TRANSFORMATION, AND PERSUASION (Dinah Shelton, ed.), pp. 240-248.
FREEMAN, MICHAEL (2011). THE VALUE AND VALUES OF HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF CHILDREN – FROM VISIONS TO IMPLEMENTATION (ANTONELLA INVERNIZZI AND JANE WILLIAMS, EDS.), PP. 21-36.
Freeman, Michael (2011). Why it Remains Important to Take Children’s Rights Seriously, in CHILDREN’S RIGHTS: PROGRESS AND PERSPECTIVES—ESSAYS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDREN’S RIGHTS (M. Freeman ed.), pp.5-25
Freeman, Michael (2007). Article 3. The Best Interests of the Child, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp. 1-79.
Harris-Short, Sonia (2007). Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998 – judicial restraint or revolution in. JUDICIAL REASONING UNDER THE UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT (Fenwick, Helen. Phillipson, Gavin & Masterman, Roger eds.), pp. 308-347.
Hendrick, Harry (2004). Identities and definitions, in CHILD WELFARE – MAJOR THEMES IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELFARE, VOL. 1: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES, (Nick Frost ed., 2005), pp. 231-250.
Kamchedzera, Garton (2012). Article5. The Child’s Right to Appropriate Direction and Guidance, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp.1-40.
Méndez, Emilio Gracía (2013). A Comparative Study of the Impact of the Convention on the Rights of the Child – Law Reform in Selected Civil Law Countries, in PROTECTING THE WORLD’S CHILDREN – IMPACT OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN DIVERSE LEGAL SYSTEMS (UNICEFhttp://ebooks.cambridge.org).
Nowak, Manfred (2005). Article 6. The Right to Life, Survival and Development, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp. 1-49.
Parker, Steven (1994). The Best Interests of the Child Principles and Problems, in THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD – RECONCILING CULTURE AND HUMAN RIGHTS (Philip Alston ed.), pp. 26-41.
Shelton, Dinah (2011). Introduction, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS: INCORPORATION, TRANSFORMATION, AND PERSUASION (D. Shelton ed.), pp. 1-22.
Shelton, Dinah (2003), Commentary and Conclusions, in COMMITMENT AND COMPLIANCE: THE ROLE OF NON-BINDING NORMS IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM (D. Shelton ed.), pp. 449-463
Sloss, David (2009). Treaty Enforcement in Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis,in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (David Sloss ed.), pp. 1-60.
Verheyde, Mieke (2007). Articles 43-45. The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, in A COMMENTARY ON THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (A. Alen, J. Vande Lanotte, E. Verhellen, F. Ang, E. Berghamans and M Verheyde eds.), pp.1-50.
Williams, Jane (2015). England and Wales, in LITIGATING THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD – THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE (Ton Liefaard & Jaap E. Doek eds.), pp.53-70.
(三)期刊論文
Alston, Philip (1994). The Best Interests Principle: Towards A Reconciliation of Culture and Human Right, 8 International Journal of Law and the Family, pp. 1-25.
Alston, Philip (1992). The legal framework of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, 91/2 Bulletin of Human Rights, pp.1-15.
Bianchi, Andrea (2004). International Law and US Courts – the Myth of Lohengrin Revisited, 15(4) European Journal of International Law, pp.751-781.
Bonner, David & Fenwick, Helen (2003). Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act 52(3) I.C.L.Q., pp.549-585.
Clayton, Richard (Spr. 2004). Judicial Deference and ‘Democratic Dialogue’: the Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998, P.L., pp.33-47.
Donnelly, C. (2010). Reflections of a Guardian Ad Litem on the Participation of Looked-after Children in Public Law Proceedings, 16(2) Child Care in Practice, pp. 181-193.
Eekelaar, John (2002), Beyond the Welfare Principle, 14(3) Child Law and Family Law Quarterly, pp.237-249.
Eekelaar, John (1986), The Emergence of Children’s Rights, 6(2) OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, pp. 161-182.
Fredman, Sandra (2006). From Deference to Democracy: The Role of Equality Under the Human Rights Act 1998, 122 L.Q.R., pp.53,-81.
Freeman, Michael (2006), Review Essay: What’s Right with Rights for Children, 2(1) International Journal of Law in Context, pp. 89-98.
Freeman, Michael (1993). Laws, Conventions and Rights, 7(1) Children & Society, pp.37-48.
Funge, Ann M. (2011). Articulated At Last: What Factors Constitute ‘Best Interests of the Child, 33-APR Pa. Law, pp.24-26.
Griffith, Daniel B. (1991). The Best Interests Standard: A Comparison of the State’s Parens Patriae Authority and Judicial Oversight in Best Interests Determinations for Children and Incompetent Patients, 8 Issues L. & Med., pp. 283-338.
Guzman, Andrew T. &Meyer, Timothy L. (2003). International Soft Law, 2 Journal of Legal Analysis, pp.171-222.
Handl, Gunther F. et al (1990) A Hard Look at Soft Law, 82 American Society of International Law Proceedings, pp.371-393.
Herring, Jonathan (2002). The Human Rights of Children in Care, 118 L.Q.R., pp.534-538.
Hickman, Tom (Sum. 2005). Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998, P.L., pp.306-335.
Kanetake, Machiko & Nollkaemper, André (2014). The Application of Informal Instruments Before Domestic Courts, 46 George Washiongton International Law Review, pp. 765-807.
Klug, Francesca & Starmer, Keir (Win. 2005)., Standing Back From the Human Rights Act: How Effective is it Five Years On? P.L., pp.716-728.
Kohm, Lynne M.(2008). Tracing the Foundations of the Best Interests of the Child Standard in American Jurisprudence, 10 J. L. & Fam. Stud., pp. 337-376.
Kopelman, Loretta & Zermatten, Jean (2010). The Best Interests of the Child Principle: Literal Analysis and Function, 8 Int. J. Child Right, pp. 483-499.
Lee, Yanghee (2013). Address: Creating New Futures for All Children: The Promise of International Human Rights Law, 20 Australian International Law, pp. 3-16.
Lopatka, Adam (1999). The Convention on the Rights of the Child: Universal Dilemmas, An Essay, 21 Whittier L. Rev. pp. 83-93.
Lundy, Laura. Kilkelly, Ursula & Byrne, Bronagh (2013). Incorporation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Law: A Comparative Review, 21Int’l J. Children’s Rts, pp. 442-463.
Mechlem, Kerstin (2009). Treaty Bodies and the Interpretation of Human Rights, 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, pp. 905-947.
Mercer, Kathryn L. (Winter, 1998). A Content Analysis of Judicial Decision-Making: How Judges Use the Primary Caretaker Standard to Make a Custody Determination, 5 Wm.& Mary J. Women & L., pp. 1-148.
Miles, Joanna (2002). Mind the Gap…Child Protection, Statutory Interpretation and the Human Rights Act, 61(3) C.L.J., pp. 533-537.
Nicol, Danny (Win. 2006). Law and Politics after the Human Rights Act, P.L., pp.722-751.
Peskind, Steven N. (2005). Determining the Undeterminable: The Best Interest of the Child Standard as an Imperfect but Necessary Guidepost to Determine Child Custody, 25 N. Ill. U. L. Rev., pp. 449-481.
Potter, Mark (2008). The Voice of the Child: Children’s “rights” in Family Proceedings, 2 The Family in Law, available at http://www.mishpat.ac.il/files/650/2911/3605/3606.pdf.
Robert Mnook (1975). Child Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy, 39 L. Contemp. Probs., pp. 226-293.
Rodham, Hilary (1973). Children under the Law, 43 Harvard Educational Review pp.487-514.
Sales, Philip & Ekins, Richard (2011) Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998, 127 L.Q.R., pp. 217-238.
Sawyer, Caroline (1999). Conflicting Rights for Children: Implementing welfare, autonomy and justice within family proceedings, 21(2) Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, pp. 99-120.
Singh, Rabinder (2002). The Declaration of Incompatibility, 7(4) Judicial Review, pp.237-243.
Sloss, David (2006). Using International Law to Enhance Democracy, 47 Va. J. Int’l L., pp.1-61.
Sorkow, Harvey R. (1991). Best Interests of the Child: By Whose Definition? 18 Pepp.L.Rev., pp.383-387.
Starmer ,Keir (2003). Two Years of the Human Rights Act, 1 E.H.R.L.R., pp.14-23.
Steyn, Johan van Zyl (Lord Steyn)(1998). ‘Incorporation and Devolution-a Few Reflections on the Challenging Scene’,2 European Human Rights Law Review, pp.153-156.
Straw, Jack (2010). The Human Rights Act – Ten Years On, 6 E.H.R.L.R., pp.576-581.
Tapp P. (2006). Judges are Human Too: Conversations Between the Judge and a Child as a Means of Giving Effect to Section 6 of the Care of Children Act 2004, 35 New Zealand Law Review, pp. 35-74.
Turner, Catherine (2011). Human Rights and the Empire of International Law, 29 Lw & Inequality, pp.313-341.
Vick, Douglas W. (2002). The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution, 37(2) Tex. Int'l L.J., pp. 329-372.
Weisburd, A. Mark (2005). Roper and the Use of International Sources, 45 Va. J. Int’l L., pp. 789-798.
Wright, Jane (Jul. 2009). Interpreting Section 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Towards an Indigenous Jurisprudence of Human Rights, P.L., pp. 595-616.
Young, Alison L.(Oct. 2011). Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998? P.L., pp. 337-800.
(四)研究報告
Alston, Philip & Tobin, John (Nov 2005). Laying the Foundations for Children’s Rights, UNICEF, available at https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/ii_layingthefoundations.pdf.
Blake, Conway (2008). Normative Instruments in International Human Rights Law: Locating the General Comment (Ctr. for Human Rights & Global Justice, Working Paper No. 17, 2008).
Child Rights International Network (CRIN). Access to Justice for Children: France, Child Rights International Network, https://www.crin.org/en/home/law/access,https://www.crin.org/sites/default/files/ france_access_to_justice_sept2015_0.pdf
Child Rights International Network (CRIN), Access to Justice for Children: Germany, Child Rights International Network, https://www.crin.org/en/home/law/access.
Child Rights International Network (CRIN), Access to justice for children: a comparative analysis of 197 countries, https://www.crin.org/en/home/law/access.
Child Rights International Network (CRIN), Rights, Remedies & Representation: Global Report on Access to Justice for Children, 2016, available at https://www.crin.org/sites/default/files/crin_a2j_global_report_final_1.pdf
Peters, Jean Koh (2005). How Children Are Heard in Child Protective Proceedings, in the United States and Around the World in 2005: Survey Findings, Initial Observations, and Areas for Further Study, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, available at http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3181&context=f ss_papers.
UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (2006). The General Measures of the Convention on the Rights of the Child – The Process in Europe and Central Asia, available at http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/415.
UNICEF Innocenti Research Search Centre (2007), Law Reform and Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, available at http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/493.
(五)聯合國官方文件
U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child,
_______ General Comment No. 1 (2003) on Article 29: the aims of education.
_______ General Comment No. 5 (2003) on “General Measures of implementation for the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6).
______ General Comment No. 7 (2005)on implementing child rights in early childhood.
______ General Comment No. 10, Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice (2007).
______ General Comment No. 12 (2009) on the right of the child to be heard.
______ General Comment No. 13 (2011): The right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence.
______ General comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration.
_______ Concluding Observations: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – Overseas Territories CRC/C/15/Add.135 (2000).
Human Rights Committee
_______ General Comment No. 6 (1982): Right to life
_______ General Comment No. 18 (1989): Non-discrimination
The Secretary General (1949), The Main Types and Causes of Discrimination: Memorandum (UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/40/Rev.1, 1949),
(六)其他
德國聯邦外交部(Auswärtiges Amt)網站資料,Children’s Rights in the United Nations, Federal Foreign Office, http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Aussenpolitik/Menschenrechte/Kinderrecht eVN_node.html
Gainborough, Jenni & Lean, Elisabeth (2008), Convention on the Rights of the Child and Juvenile Justice, available at http://www.cwla.org/programs/juvenilejustice/thelink2008summer.pdf.
Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty, Presented to Parliament, The Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill, Command Paper No. Cm 3782 (“White Paper”), para. 1.2 (October 1997), https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-human-rights-bill.
UK Ministry of Justice (2014), Responding to Human Rights Judgments: Report to the Joint Committee Human Rights on the Government Response to Human Rights Judgments 2013-2014 (cm 8962) .