臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：多邊貿易談判的政治脈絡：國際關係理論作為WTO政策研究工具之初探
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：周旭華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chou, Hsu-hua
出版日期：2010
卷期：28:2
頁次：頁153-206
主題關鍵詞：世界貿易組織；談判；政治脈絡；國際關係；國際建制；WTO；Negotiation；Political context；International relations；International regime
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:44
WTO研究由於涉及大量法律文獻之處理，長期以來以法律取向之研究為主力。然WTO研究亦常涉及政策面向，特別是涉及談判立場或制度改良方案，因而往往需要將法律問題置於較大的政治經濟脈絡下處理。國際關係研究者關注國際事務中的政治面「因素」、「過程」以及「因果關係」，且已累積大量研究成果。因此，應用國際關係理論及相關研究成果，有助於闡明以法律為中心的WTO談判及制度演進的政治脈絡，而提高WTO研究的政策面貢獻。 本文綜合當代主要國際關係理論之特性及長處，以及WTO研究之需求，嘗試提出一套簡明架構，供研究者參考運用。本文擬議以國家為中心，優先審視權力、利益、制度、理念、談判策略等因素，建立一套結合國際關係新自由制度主義、現實主義、社會建構主義，以及國際建制理論的基本分析架構，以供探索WTO政治脈絡之用。在基本分析架構外，本文建議廣納其他理論之精華，作為補充。例如：應用自由主義以闡明國內因素；應用全球治理概念以闡明WTO所面對之整體挑戰及因應之道。
Study on the WTO has been traditionally dominated by legal academics. However, it requires a multidisciplinary approach to illuminate the broader context of law, particularly when dealing with policy aspects. WTO researchers normally are expected to play policy making roles such as evaluating negotiating positions or redesigning institutions. Using insights from International Relations (IR), WTO researchers can better understand the political context of the WTO in general and multilateral trade negotiations in particular. They can produce works which are more policy relevant and make better policy contributions. This paper synthesizes major modern IR theories and proposes a concise analytical framework for studying WTO negotiations and regime evolution. The framework, which is designed for exploring the political context of the WTO, is a state-centric one based on neo-liberal institutionalism, realism, and international regime theory. It also includes constructivism to deal with factors about ideas. In addition, this paper suggests the analysis be enriched by other IR theories such as liberalism and global governance theory.
期刊論文
1.Slaughter, Anne-Marie、Tulumello, Andrew S.、Wood, Stepan(1998)。International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship。The American Journal of International Law，92(3)，367-397。  new window
2.Narlikar, Amrita、Tussie, Diana(200407)。The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial:Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO。World Economy，27(7)，947-966。  new window
3.Slaughter, Anne-Marie(1993)。International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda。American Journal of International Law，87(2)，205-239。  new window
4.Abbott, Kenneth W.(199904)。International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Atrocities in Internal Conflicts。The American Journal of International Law，93(3)，361-379。  new window
5.Keohane, Robert O.(1997)。International Relations and International Law: Two Optics。Harvard International Law Journal，38(2)，487-502。  new window
6.Chamovitz, Steve(2001)。Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions。The American Journal of International Law，95(4)，792-832。  new window
7.周旭華(20050900)。WTO與全球化的法律治理：以GATS觀光附件提案為例。問題與研究，44(5)，143-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Moravcsik, Andrew(1997)。Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics。International Organization，51(4)，513-553。  new window
9.Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。  new window
10.Steinberg, Richard H.(2002)。In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO。International Organization，56(2)，339-374。  new window
11.Abbott, Kenneth W.(1989)。“Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers.”。Yale Journal of International Law，14，335-411。  new window
12.Abbott, Kenneth W.(2005)。“Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy.”。Journal of International Law and International Relations，1，9-34。  new window
13.Arend, Anthony Clark.(1998)。“Do Legal Rules Matter？ International Law and International Politics.”。Virginia Journal of International Law，38，107-153。  new window
14.Dunoff, Jeffrey.(2005)。“Why Constitutionalism Now? Text, Context and the Historical Contingency of Ideas.”。Journal of International Law and International Relations，1，191-212。  new window
15.Jackson, John H.(2002)。“Perceptions about the WTO Trade Institutions。World Trade Review，1, 1，101-114。  new window
16.Jackson, John H.(2005)。“The Changing Fundamentals of International Law and Ten Years of the WTO.”。Journal of International Economic Law，8，3-15。  new window
17.Keohane, Robert O.(2002)。“Rational Choice Theory and International Law: Insights and Limitations.”。Journal of Legal Studies，31, 1，307-319。  new window
18.Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich.(2008)。“Why Rational Choice Theory Requires a Multilevel Constitutional Approach to International Economic Law ？”。University of Illinois Law Review，1，359-382。  new window
19.Princen, Sebastiaan.(2004)。“EC Compliance with WTO Law: The Interplay of Law and Politics.”。European Journal of International Law，15, 3，555-574。  new window
20.Shell, G. Richard.(1995)。“Trade Legalism and International Relations Theory: An Analysis of the World Trade Organization.”。Duke Law Journal，44, 5，829-927。  new window
21.Slaughter, Anne-Marie.(1995)。“Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Economic Law: Liberal International Relations Theory and International Economic Law.”。American University Journal of International Law and Policy，10, 2，717-743。  new window
22.Steinberg, Richard.(2004)。“Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints.”。American Journal of International Law，98, 2，247-275。  new window
23.(1999)。The American Society of International Law.。American Journal of International Law，93,2。  new window
24.Van Asselt, Harro et al.(2008)。“Global Climate Change and the Fragmentation of International Law.”。Law and Policy，30, 4，423-449。  new window
25.Young, Oran R.(2001)。“Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.”。Global Environmental Politics，1, 1，99-121。  new window
26.周旭華(2008)。〈開發中國家參與 WTO 談判之結盟考量與議題策略- 以 1999-2001 觀光立法推動為例〉。國際關係學報，26，17-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.JACKSON, JOHN H.(2000)。THE JURISPRUDENCE OF GATT AND THE WTO。  new window
2.Dougherty, James、Pfaltzgraff, Robert L.(2001)。Contending Theories of International Relations。New York：Longman。  new window
3.Odell, John S.(2006)。Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Young, Oran R.(1999)。Governance in World Affairs。Ithata, NY：Cornell University Press。  new window
5.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Johseph S., Jr.(2001)。Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition。New York：Longman。  new window
6.Hoekman, Bernard、Kostecki, Michael(2001)。The Political Economy of the World Trading System:The WTO and Beyond。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.洪德欽(200203)。WTO法律與政策專題研究。學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.羅昌發(199910)。國際貿易法。月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。  new window
10.Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regimes。Cornell University Press。  new window
11.Abbott, Kenneth W.(2003)。Development policy in the new millennium and the DOHA "Development Round"。Manila：Asian Development Bank。  new window
12.Barton, John et al.(2006)。The Evolution of the Trade Regime。Princeton。  new window
13.Goldstein, Joshua and Jon Pevehouse.(2007)。International Relations。New York。  new window
14.Hathaway, Oona A. and Harolad Hongju Koh.(2005)。Foundations of International Law and Politics。New York。  new window
15.Held, David et al.(2000)。Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate。Cambridge。  new window
16.Jackson, John H.(2002)。“SovereigntySovereignty, Subsidiarity, and Separation of Powers: the High Wire Balancing Act of Globalization.”。The Political Economy of International Trade Law.。Cambridge。  new window
17.Odell, John.(2002)。“The Seattle Impasse and its Implications for the World Trade Organization.”。The Political Economy of International Trade Law。Cambridge。  new window
18.Oeter, Stefen.(2009)。“Theorizing the Global Order: An Institutionalist Perspective.”。Theorizing the Global Order。Oxford。  new window
19.Raustialia, Kal and Anne-Marie Slaughter.(2002)。“International Law, International Relations and Compliance.”。The Handbook of International Relations。London。  new window
20.Steinberg, Richard and Beth A. Simmons.(2007)。International Law and International Relations: An International Organization Reader。Cambridge。  new window
21.Trachtman, Joel P.(2008)。International Law and Politics。Aldershot。  new window
22.Tussie, Dianna.(2009)。“The Politics of Trade: The Role of Research in Trade Policy and Negotiations.”。The Politics of Trade: The Role of Research in Trade Policy and Negotiations。Leiden。  new window
23.Vayrynen, Raimo.(1999)。“Norms, Compliance, and Enforcement.”。Globalization and Global Governance。Lanham, MD。  new window
24.Young, Oran R. et al.(2008)。Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade。New Tork。  new window
圖書論文
1.Odell, John S.、Sell, Susan K.(2006)。Reframing the Issue: The Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health in the WTO, 2001。Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：710（臺灣：710，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67413503
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上