臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：歐盟食品安全制度對臺灣食安改革的啟示
書刊名：國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：洪德欽 引用關係
作者(外文)：Horng, Der-chin
出版日期：2015
卷期：44:特刊
頁次：頁1163-1236
主題關鍵詞：歐盟；食品安全；食品管制；制度保障；歐盟食品安全局；歐盟食品安全實驗室；食安警察；消費者保護；食品安全衛生管理法；臺灣；EU；Food safety；Food control；Institutional protection；European Food Safety Authority；EFSA；EU reference laboratory；EU-RL；Food safety police；Consumer protection；The Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation；Taiwan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:405
  • 點閱點閱:153
1990年代以來歐洲與臺灣陸續爆發一些重大食品醜聞事件，使食品安全形成一項重要問題。健全的制度乃食品管制的一項必要條件，以確保食品安全，並保障消費者權益、公共健康及其他公共利益。歐盟於178／2002規則通過之後，已建構一個較為完備的食品法律與制度，涵蓋從農場到餐桌整條食品鏈；歐盟並採取風險評估與風險管理權責分開原則，以提高食安治理的客觀性及公信力，為歐盟公民消費權及健康權提供高標準的保障。除了負責風險管理的歐盟執委會之外，歐盟食品安全制度的重要機構包括：由一個獨立性歐盟食品安全局負責科學性風險評估，以強化食安決策的合理性；歐盟食安實驗室負責系統性食品檢驗，以提升食品品質；會員國食安警察負責對食品業者的現場稽核，以打擊非法食品活動等。歐盟上述食安建制皆有助於提高食安治理的效率，落實食品法律的執行，促進會員國風險管制的歐盟化，並對會員國食品安全及消費者權益提供多層級的制度保障。本文將以歐盟食品管制的法理、食品風險評估、實驗室以及食安警察等相關制度，作為研究重點，比較臺灣相關建制，並研擬具體建議，做為我國法律改革的參考，以完善臺灣食安體系，並促進全民福祉。
Food safety emerged as a key health and safety issue following a series of food scandals in Europe and Taiwan which began in the 1990s. Proper institutional control has been recognized as an essential element in protecting the health and interests of consumers with respect to food, and so, following the adoption of Regulation 178/2002, the EU acted to establish an effective food control system convering all the food chain from farm to table. The EU applied a seperation principle for risk assessement and risk management in food safety. In line with the European Commission responsible for risk management, the major institutions of the EU food safety include: an independent European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in charge of scientific risk assessment to promote rationality of food policy decision; the European Union Reference Laboratories (EU-RLs) in assistance with regular and systematic food inspection to raise food quality; and the food safety police in Member States in auditing food products and cracking down illegal activities. As a whole, the EU institutional system would enhance the EU's food safety governance and promote the implementation of EU food law. This food control system also facilitates the Europeanisation of risk assessment and food inspection at the European level and provides a multilevel institutional protection for food safety and consumer interest in the EU Member States. This paper examines EU food control jurisprudence and the associated institutional frameworks on risk assessment, reference laboratories, and food safety police, and compares these with corresponding institutions in Taiwan. It also offers some critical proposals for reforming Taiwan's laws to enhance the food safety system and consumer welfare in general.
期刊論文
1.吳行浩(20140300)。由比較法觀點論食品安全管理規範之檢討。高大法學論叢，9(2)，115-163+165-169+171-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李惠宗、林昱梅、徐育安、許恒達、陳聰富、廖大穎、范瑞華、顧立雄(20131200)。「毒澱粉不是澱粉！」座談會會議綜述。月旦法學，223，275-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林昱梅(20140100)。食品安全、風險管理與確認訴訟之合法性--德國禁止狂牛症風險飼料進口案判決評析。月旦法學，224，190-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.胡博硯、黃文政(20131215)。我國新修正食品衛生管理法之解析與反省：回應食安危機。臺灣法學雜誌，238，31-42。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳陸宏、蔡淑貞(20141200)。事出必有因--食安問題因何而起。科學發展月刊，504，6-11。  延伸查詢new window
6.廖義男(19970700)。消費者保護法成效之檢討及展望。律師雜誌，214，4-7。  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭高彥(2014)。人文社會科學的入世精神。人文與社會科學簡訊，16(1)，1。  延伸查詢new window
8.Alemanno, A.(2014)。Unpacking the Principle of Openness in the EU Law: Transparency, Participation and Democracy。European Law Review，39，72-90。  new window
9.Bronzwaer, S.(2008)。EFSA Scientific Foram ''from Safe Food to Health Diets''. EU Risk Assessment--Past, Present and Future。Trends in Food Science & Technology，19，2-8。  new window
10.Deluyker, H.、Slano, V.(2012)。Editorial: The First Ten Years of Activity of EFSA: A Success Story。EFSA Journal，10，1-6。  new window
11.Editors of Common Market Law Review(2015)。Safeguarding EU values in the Member States--Is something finally happening?。Common Market Law Review，52，619-628。  new window
12.EFSA、EMA(2013)。Joint Statement of EFSA and EMA on the Presence of Residues of Phenylbutazone in Horse Meat。EFSA Journal，11(4)，1-45。  new window
13.Greif, A.、Laitin, D. D.(2004)。A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Changes。American Political Science Review，98，633-652。  new window
14.Habermas, J.(2015)。Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible。European Law Journal，21(4)，546-557。  new window
15.Herdegen, M.(1994)。Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an ''Ever Closer Union''。Common Market Law Review，31，235-249。  new window
16.Kanska, K.(2004)。Wolves in the Clothing of Sheep? The Case of the European Food Safety Authority。European Law Review，29，711-727。  new window
17.Korthals, M.(2001)。Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignty。Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics，14，201-215。  new window
18.Majone, G.(1997)。The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information。Journal of European Public Policy，4，262-275。  new window
19.Peltzman, S.(1980)。The Growth of Government。Journal of Law Economics，23，209-287。  new window
20.Shaffer, G.(2002)。Reconciling Trade and Regulatory Goals: The Prospects and Limits of New Approaches to Transatlantic Governance Through。Columbia Journal of European Law，9，29-77。  new window
21.Snyder, F.(2013)。We Need a Global Food Safety Agency: Reflection on the Hidden Jurisprudence of the WTO。Peking University Transnational Law Review，1(2)，162-209。  new window
22.Trachtman, I. P.(1993)。International Regulatory Competition, Extemalization, and Jurisdiction。Harvard International Law Journal，34，47-104。  new window
23.Ugland, T.、Veggeland, F.(2006)。Experiments in Food Safety Policy Integration in the European Union。Journal of Common Market Studies，44，607-624。  new window
24.Vos, E.(2000)。EU Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis。Journal of Consumer Policy，23，227-255。  new window
25.林昱梅(20100300)。當健康風險之預防遇上商品自由流通原則--評歐洲法院有關歐盟禁止英國牛肉輸出之判決。月旦法學，178，258-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.江玉林(20091000)。你吃得安心嗎？--毒牛奶事件的「法律／科技／社會」反思。月旦法學，173，63-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.沈宗原(20140200)。以假亂真的食品安全問題--談國家的作為與問題。萬國法律，193，51-59。  延伸查詢new window
28.邱文聰(20131215)。畫餅充飢的食品安全風險管控策略--簡評食品衛生管理法修正。臺灣法學雜誌，238，11-17。  延伸查詢new window
29.倪貴榮(20130600)。食品安全與風險治理--評析含「萊克多巴胺」美畜產品之管制。月旦法學，217，108-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Gilardi, F.(2002)。Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis。Journal of European Public Policy，9(6)，873-893。  new window
31.Greenwald, B.、Stiglitz, J. E.、Weiss, A.(1984)。Information Imperfection in the Capital Market and Macroeconomic Fluctuation。America Economic Review，74，194-200。  new window
32.Howells, G.、Wilhelmsson, T.(2003)。EC Consumer Law: Has It Come of Age?。European Law Review，28，370-388。  new window
33.Lemer, A. P.(1972)。The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty。American Economic Review，62，258-266。  new window
34.Stuyck, J.(2000)。European Consumer Law after the Treaty of Amsterdam: Consumer Policy in or Beyond the Internal Market?。Common Market Law Review，37，367-400。  new window
35.林鈺雄(20141101)。食安防線與食品犯罪--從正義、頂新黑油事件說起。臺灣法學雜誌，259，1-6。  延伸查詢new window
36.林繼文(20011200)。創設、選擇與演化--制度形成的三個理論模式。政治學報，32，61-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.洪德欽(20081200)。消費者權利在歐盟基改食品標示之規定與實踐。歐美研究，38(4)，509-578。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.林昱梅(20131215)。失落的道德線--食用油事件之省思。臺灣法學雜誌，238，18-30。  延伸查詢new window
39.顏厥安(20080900)。德沃金之詮釋主義及其徹底化。中研院法學期刊，3，163-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.林鈺雄(20141201)。法人犯罪及不法利得之沒收--評大統混油案刑事判決。臺灣法學雜誌，261，94-111。  延伸查詢new window
41.李寧修(20130500)。論歐盟及德國食品安全法制與其通報系統之建構。興大法學，13，1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.林明昕(20050300)。基本權各論基礎講座（17）--健康權：以「國家之保護義務」為中心。法學講座，32，26-36。  延伸查詢new window
43.黃立(19980600)。評析世界貿易組織爭端解決機構對荷爾蒙案的裁決。政大法學評論，59，277-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.FAO(2005)。Second FAO/WHO Global Forum of Food Safety Regulators: Building Effective Food Safety Systems。Second FAO/WHO Global Forum of Food Safety Regulators: Building Effective Food Safety Systems。Rome：FAO。  new window
研究報告
1.立法院公報處(2014)。立法院公報。台北：立法院。  延伸查詢new window
2.監察院(2014)。監察院103年度專案調查研究報告：監察食品衛生安全檢討與成效專案調查研究。台北：監察院。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20141124)。立法院公報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Horn, N.、羅莉(2005)。法律科學與法哲學導論。北京：法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央研究院(2014)。國家食品安全維護及環境毒物防治體系建議書。台北：中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.國家衛生研究院(2006)。95年度國家衛生研究院年報。台北：國家衛生研究院。  延伸查詢new window
4.國家衛生研究院(2015)。104年度財團法人國家衛生研究院總說明。台北：國家衛生研究院。  延伸查詢new window
5.警政署(2013)。102年警政工作年報。台北：內政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alemanno, Alberto、Gabbi, Simone(2014)。Foundations of EU Food Law and Policy: Ten Years of the European Food Safety Authority。Ashgate。  new window
7.Benohr, I.(2013)。EU Consumer Law and Human Rights。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Brownsword, R.(2008)。Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
9.EFSA(2011)。Annual Report 2010。Parma：EFSA。  new window
10.EFSA(2015)。Annual Report 2014。Parma：EFSA。  new window
11.European Commission(1997)。Consumer Health and Food Safety。Brussels：European Commission。  new window
12.European Commission(1999)。White Paper on Food Safety。Brussels：European Commission。  new window
13.European Commission(2011)。Evaluation of the EU-RLs in the Field of Food and Feed Safety and Animal Health and Live Animals. Final Report. Part I: Evaluation Report。Brussels：European Commission。  new window
14.European Union(2014)。The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed 2013 Annual Report。Brussels：European Union。  new window
15.Europol(2014)。Annual Activity Report Europol 2013。The Hague：Europol。  new window
16.FAO(2003)。Assuring Food Safety and Quality: Guidelines for Strengthening National Food Control Systems。Rome：FAO。  new window
17.FAO(2006)。Strengthening National Food Control Systems. Guidelines to Access Capacity Building Needs。Rome：FAO。  new window
18.H. M. Government(2014)。Elliott Review into the Integrity and Assurance of Food Supply Framework--Final Report. A National Food Crime Prevention Framework (July 2014)。London：H. M. Government。  new window
19.Popper, K.(1945)。The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. I : The Spell of Plato。London：George Routledge & Sons。  new window
20.Prosser, T.(2010)。The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
21.Scholten-Verheijen, I.、Applhof, T.、van den Heuvel, R.、van der Meulen, B.(2012)。Roadmap to EU Food Law。The Hague：Eleven Inti Pub。  new window
22.朱柏松(1999)。消費者保護法論。台北：朱柏松。  延伸查詢new window
23.林彩瑜(2009)。貿易與公共衛生之法律問題：世界貿易組織法律研究。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
24.林富士(2010)。食品科技與現代文明。台北：稻鄉。  延伸查詢new window
25.許耀明(2009)。歐盟法、WTO法與科技法。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
26.Hood, C.、Rothstein, H.、Baldwin, R.(2001)。The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
27.Weatherill, S.(2005)。EU Consumer Law and Policy。Cheltenham：Edward Elgar。  new window
28.Weiler, J. H. H.(1999)。The Constitution of Europe。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
29.World Health Organization(2002)。WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety: Safer Food for Better Health。Geneva：World Health Organization。  new window
30.李震山(2005)。多元、寬容與人權保障：以憲法未列舉權之保障為中心。台北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London：Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
32.North, Douglass C.(1990)。Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
33.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
34.Rawls, John(1971)。A Theory of Justice。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
35.林水波、張世賢(2006)。公共政策。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
36.許宗力(2007)。憲法與法治國行政。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
38.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
39.洪德欽(20130000)。WTO法律與政策專題研究。臺北：新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.拉德布魯赫、王樸(2005)。法哲學。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
41.邱錦添、李根永(2014)。食品安全衛生管理法之理論與實務。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
42.Beck, Ulrich、Ritter, Mark(1992)。Risk Society。London：Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jarass, Hans D.、李建良(2010)。基本權利：防禦權與客觀之基本原則規範之基本權利內涵，尤其保護義務及形成私法之效力。德國聯邦憲法法院五十周年紀念論文集。台北：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
2.Badura, Peter、張道義(2010)。聯邦憲法法院所認知的憲法、國家與社會。德國聯邦憲法法院五十周年紀念論文集。台北：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
3.江玉林(2008)。法律、權力與共通福祉：從SARA防治及妤困暫行條例談起。2007科技發展與法律規範雙年刊：公衛風險的法律建構。台北：中央研究院法律研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪德欽(2015)。歐盟法的淵源。歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展。臺北：國立臺灣大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.Snyder, F.(2003)。The Unfinished Constitution of the European Union: Principles, Process and Culture。European Constitutional ism beyond the State。Cambridge：Cambridge University。  new window
6.李建良(2011)。保護規範理論之思維與應用：行政法院裁判若干問題舉隅。2010行政管制與行政爭訟。台北：中央研究院法律研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪德欽(200611)。歐盟東擴與人權歐盟化。歐洲聯盟人權保障。台北：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.洪德欽(2007)。歐盟憲法之法理分析。歐盟憲法。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪德欽(2011)。歐盟食品安全局風險評估體系之研究。歐盟與美國生物科技政策。中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：592（臺灣：591，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67438131
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上