:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:縣市合併改制議題之研究:以高雄市、臺南市及臺中市為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:黃東益 引用關係謝忠安
作者(外文):Huang, Tong-yiHsieh, Chung-an
出版日期:2014
卷期:32:3
頁次:頁51-129
主題關鍵詞:組織改造縣市合併組織合併合併改制Organizational reinventionCity-county consolidationOrganizational mergerGovernment merger and structuring
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:116
  • 點閱點閱:136
組織重組是近年來政府組織為回應治理環境的變遷與公民社會壓力所使用的策略。在地方政府改革的策略中,縣市合併被視為是提升行政效率、促進平等、增進課責,以及解決政府財政惡化等問題的主要途徑。2010年臺灣實施地方政府合併改制,可說是精省後最大的地方行政改革措施。世界各國縣市合併的行政措施已有近百年的實務經驗,而相關研究已有相當累積;反觀國內有關地方政府組織合併的相關研究,對於這個重要議題的投入及其研究成果相當有限。基於組織合併不僅是政府改革必須不斷面對的問題,也是行政改革、組織理論與行為、以及府際關係等領域核心的研究議題,因此有必要全面性地瞭解國內外縣市合併的經驗與相關研究焦點。本文首先有系統地整理並呈現,有關國內外不同地方政府或縣市合併所累積的研究成果,接續以內容分析方法,分析報章媒體中有關2009年縣市合併938篇的報導內容,並佐以縣市局處首長之訪談,以彙整國內高雄、臺南、臺中等三都,合併經驗中的重要議題。研究發現,在國內外過去的文獻中,甚少從個人與組織層次的角度,探討縣市合併的成敗因素,以及縣市合併所產生的影響,本文依據分析結果提出建議,做為未來學界研究議程的參考。希冀未來透過學界投入更多的系統性研究,為從事行政改革的實務者累積治理的智慧資產。
Organizational reinvention has become a critical strategy for government to respond to changing environments and the pressure from [the] civil society. Among the reorganization strategies for local governments, the "city-county merger or consolidation" has been considered as a main approach to raising administrative efficiency, increasing service quality, improving accountability and solving the problem of local financial deterioration. In 2010, [the] city-county consolidation in Taiwan local governments can be seen as the most tremendous reformation after the downsizing of Taiwan's provincial government. In Western countries, there have not only been plenty of city-county consolidation cases, but there has also been quite a lot of research into this phenomenon. In Taiwan, only a few researchers have focused on this important issue. Organizational consolation is not only a continuous problem that governments have to confront, but is also an important academic issue in the study of bureaucracy reform, organizational theory, organizational behavior, and intergovernmental relations; therefore, it is necessary to organize the overall related experiences and researches, including Taiwan in addition to other countries. This research firstly sorts out and presents systematically the research of city-county consolidation of local governments in Taiwan and other countries. By analyzing the content of 938 newspaper reports and in-depth interviews, the authors considered the essential issues of city-county consolidation from the experience of Taichung, Tainan and Kaohsiung. The results point out that there have been relatively few studies related to the factors in the success or failure of city-county consolidation and to its impact from the viewpoint of individual and organizational levels. Based on this analysis, we make recommendations for future academic agenda. We expect that in the future academia will undertake more systematic efforts to accumulate governance wisdom for those engaged in administrative reform.
期刊論文
1.紀俊臣(20101100)。五都對中央與地方關係之衝擊與因應。現代學術研究,17,228-252。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳朝建(201011)。五都改制對「區」的行政區劃之衝擊與因應。現代學術研究,17,40-71。  延伸查詢new window
3.林萬億、吳秉慧(20110600)。後五都時代臺灣的社會福利服務發展。社區發展季刊,134,4-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林向愷(20110600)。五都選後中央與地方財政關係。社區發展季刊,134,23-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.郭登聰(20110600)。五都選舉之後對社會福利服務資源配置與服務輸送的影響與調整:以新北市為例。社區發展季刊,134,168-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.趙永茂(19970600)。地方政府組織設計與組織重組問題之探討--兼論臺灣地方政府組織重組問題。政治科學論叢,8,183-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王德睦、官有垣、陳柯玫、許金玲、陳榮枝(20110600)。臺南縣市合併後的社會福利支出與人力預估之分析。社區發展季刊,134,253-272。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.葉俊榮(20051200)。行政院組織改造之現況與展望。研考雙月刊,29(6)=250,11-23。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉文仕(20060900)。從歐盟成員國地方治理的發展經驗解構1996-2005臺灣地方制度改革的兩大迷思。臺灣民主,3(3),35-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.紀俊臣(20040300)。永續發展與行政區域設計。中國行政評論,13(2),65-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Duming, D.(1995)。The Effects of City-County Government Consolidation: The Perspectives oi United Government Employees in Athens-Clarke County, Georgia。Public Aamimstration Quar-terly,19(3),272-298。  new window
12.蕭閎偉、林建元、白仁德(20120300)。五直轄市升格後跨區域整合治理之新課題與願景:國土規劃觀點。公共行政學報,42,139-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Askim, Jostein(2009)。How to Carry Out Joined-Up Government Reforms: Lessons from the 2001-2006 Norwegian Welfare Reform。International Journal of Public Administration,32(12),1006-1025。  new window
14.Carr, Jered B.、Feiock, Richard C.(2002)。Who Becomes Involved in City-County Consolidation? Findings from County Officials in 25 Communities。State and Local Government Review,34(2),78-94。  new window
15.Christensen, Tom(2007)。Reform of Employment and Welfare Administration-The Challenge of Coordinating Diverse Public Organizations。International Review of Administrative Science,73(3),389-408。  new window
16.Elcock, Howard(2010)。The Reorganization Addiction in Local Government: Unitary Councils for England。Public Money & Management,30(6),331-338。  new window
17.Faulk, Dagney、Grassmueck, Georg(2010)。City-County Consolidation and Local Government Expenditures。State and Local Government Review,44(3),196-205。  new window
18.Haneda, Shoko(1979)。Evaluating Administrative Efficiency Change in the Post-Merger Period a Study on Ibaraki Prefecture。International Regional Science Review,35(2),237-262。  new window
19.Jimenez, Benedict S.、Hendrick, Rebecca(2010)。Is Government Consolidation the Answer。State and Local Government Review,42(3),258-270。  new window
20.Leland, Suzanne、Thurmaier, Kurt(2005)。When Efficiency is Unbelievable Normative Lessons from 30 Years of City-County Consolidations。Public Administration Review,65(4),475-489。  new window
21.Martin, Lawrence L.、Schiff, Jeannie Hock(2011)。City-County Consolidations: Promise Versus Performance。State and Local Government Review,43(2),167-177。  new window
22.Mckay, Ruth B.(2004)。Reforming Municipal Services After Amalgamation: The Challenge of Efficiency。International Journal of Public Sector Management,17,24-47。  new window
23.Mévellec, Anne(2009)。Working the Political Field in Stormy Weather: A Mayor's Role in The Quebec Municipal Mergers。Canadian Journal of Political Science,42(3),773-792。  new window
24.Poel, Dale(2000)。Amalgamation Perspectives: Citizen Responses to Municipal Consolidation。Canadian Journal of Regional Science,23(1),31-48。  new window
25.Quesnel, Louise(2000)。Municipal Reorganisation in Québec。Canadian Journal of Regional Science,23(1),115-134。  new window
26.Savitch, H. V.、Ronald K. Vogel,(2004)。Suburbs without a City Power and City-County Consolidation。Urban Affairs Review,39(6),758-790。  new window
27.Slack, Enid(2000)。A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto。Canadian Journal of Regional Science,23(1),13-30。  new window
28.Sørensen, Rune J.(2006)。Local Government Consolidations: The Impact of Political Transaction Costs。Public Choice,127,75-95。  new window
29.Steiner, Reto(2003)。The Causes, Spread and Effects of Intermunicipal Cooperation and Municipal Mergers in Switzerland。Public Management Review,5(4),551-571。  new window
30.Takagishi, Yukihir(2012)。Influence of the Municipal Merger on Local Government Employees' Stress Response in Japan。Industrial health,50(2),132-141。  new window
31.Takaharu, Kohara(2007)。The Great Heisei Consolidation: A Critical Review。Social Science Japan,37,7-11。  new window
32.Vojnovic, Igor and Dale Poel(2000)。Provincial and Municipal Restructuring in Canada: Assessing Expectations and Outcomes。Canadian Journal of Regional Science,23(1),1-6。  new window
33.Vojnovic, Igor(2000)。Municipal Consolidation, Regional Planning and Fiscal Accountability: The Recent Experience in Two Maritime Provinces。Canadian Journal of Regional Science,23(1),49-72。  new window
34.Vojnovic, Igor(2000)。The Transitional Impacts of Municipal Consolidations。Journal of Urban Affairs,22(4),385-417。  new window
35.丁仁方、陳怡君(2010)。新統合或新多元體制?--縣市合併升格民間團體整併問題探討。中國地方自治,63(8),3-20。  延伸查詢new window
36.王舒芸、許金玲、陳榮枝(20110600)。臺南縣市合併後整合兒少福利服務輸送之挑戰。社區發展季刊,134,273-292。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.呂建德(20110600)。五都治理下的競爭與協調。社區發展季刊,134,39-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.紀俊臣(20020700)。地方行政區域調整方案之規劃與設計。中國地方自治,55(7)=635,4-24。  延伸查詢new window
39.孫健萍(20101200)。高雄縣市改制為直轄市後財政收支之研究。工程科技與教育學刊,7(5),836-849。  延伸查詢new window
40.徐仁輝(20100900)。五都制下地方財政的未來。財稅研究,42(5),87-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.高誓男(20111200)。城市創能與地方治理。研考雙月刊,35(6)=286,88-105。  延伸查詢new window
42.張美瑤(2012)。就業態度、從業壓力、組織認同對組織承諾之影響:以縣市合併後市府員工為例。數據分析,7(4),13-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.張英陣(20110600)。縣市合併對非營利組織的影響。社區發展季刊,134,228-236。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳政智、徐思涵、廖千妙(20110600)。從「高高平、區區同」談福利輸送的價值:平等只是第一步,公平才是下一步。社區發展季刊,134,344-351。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.陳國元(20100331)。嚴防縣市合併稅負大衝擊。稅務旬刊,2106,7-11。  延伸查詢new window
46.黃庭瑄、謝啟賢(20110800)。從五都升格談臺灣行政區域整併問題。臺灣經濟研究月刊,34(8)=404,86-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.葉明勳、劉坤億(20120400)。「五都」新制下區公所法制定位與治理職能之研析。文官制度季刊,4(2),93-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.葉嘉楠(20040900)。行政院組織改造方案評析:組織設計的觀點。中華人文社會學報,1,12-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.劉坤億、鄭如琳(20110800)。加拿大行政區域整併經驗對臺灣的啟示。臺灣經濟研究月刊,34(8)=404,93-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.鄭新輝(2011)。臺南縣市合併後之臺南市教育整合問題與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(1),15-17。  延伸查詢new window
51.鮑忠銑(2009)。地方政府組織變革之芻議--以高雄縣市合併改制直轄市為例。中國地方自治,62(12),22-30。  延伸查詢new window
52.謝俊義(20110300)。促進縣市合併後的都會治理成效:美國地方成長管理機制經驗的啟示。競爭力評論,14,37-50。  延伸查詢new window
53.蘇嘉宏(20100500)。縣市合併對高雄政治生態的影響。中國評論,149,66-80。  延伸查詢new window
54.蘇麗瓊(20110600)。高雄縣市合併後社會福利之發展。社區發展季刊,134,334-343。new window  延伸查詢new window
55.紀俊臣(20030100)。臺中縣(市)合併升格直轄市之可行性分析。中國地方自治,56(1)=641,4-50。  延伸查詢new window
56.劉佩怡(20080600)。臺灣行政區域調整的規劃理路。通識研究集刊,13,131-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
57.陳立剛(2007)。都會區政府合併初探--以美加地方政府為例。中國地方自治,60(12),4-13。  延伸查詢new window
58.宋餘俠、秦正宇(20110400)。強化政策統合量能之組織設計--兼論國家發展委員會組設規劃。研考雙月刊,35(2)=282,94-108。  延伸查詢new window
59.江大樹(20110300)。從縣市合併升格到區域合作治理「3都15縣」政策評析。研習論壇,123,1-25。  延伸查詢new window
60.朱景鵬、謝偉智(20100400)。行政院組織改造推動方向與執行策略。研考雙月刊,34(2)=276,8-19。  延伸查詢new window
61.吳再居(20041200)。行政院組織變革之歷史回顧。研考雙月刊,28(6)=244,39-54。  延伸查詢new window
62.趙永茂、陳銘顯(20101200)。我國地方與新都會發展的挑戰與回應。研考雙月刊,34(6)=280,23-32。  延伸查詢new window
63.蕭全政、管碧玲、江大樹(20011200)。行政院組織調整芻議。政治科學論叢,15,191-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
64.蔡清華(20111100)。整合,向前邁進--談縣市合併高雄市幾件重要的教育行政工作。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(1),4-7。  延伸查詢new window
65.蔡榮祥(20100600)。高雄縣、市合併升格後之治理模式。城市發展,9,36-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Staley, Samuel R.(2005)。The Effects of City-County Consolidation: A Review of the Recent Academic Literature。The Marion County Consolidation Study Commission。Indiana:Indiana General Assembly。  new window
圖書
1.林水波(1999)。組織理論。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.紀俊臣(2010)。直轄市政策治理。新北市:中國地方自治學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kerlinger, F. N.(1986)。Foundations of Behavior Research。NY。  new window
4.徐仁輝、楊永年、張昕(2004)。公共組織行為。臺北:智勝。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅文輝(19910000)。精確新聞報導。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Miyazaki, Takeshi(2014)。Municipal Consolidation and Local Government Behavior: Evidence from Japanese Voting Data on Merger Referenda,http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/Common/publication/DP/DP588.pdf, 2014/10/15。  new window
2.王榮祥(20100528)。縣市合併 高縣警無奈等被併。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱有鈴(20120110)。永續發展跳票 偏鄉小校近10 所快廢校。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院內政部縣市改制直轄市相關資訊網(2010)。前言,http://www.moi.gov.tw/countyreform/news_ content.aspx?id=1, 2012/10/14。  延伸查詢new window
5.何榮辛(20101215)。我見我思 等著亂一年?。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂素麗(20090923)。合併效應 高縣市人民團體 不願送作堆。  延伸查詢new window
7.李義(20110517)。議員轟水溝未清 陳菊馬上辦 大高雄合併後 野溝及排水系統各單位相互推諉無人願負責 市長指示汛期前完成清疏。  延伸查詢new window
8.林建甫(20101229)。財劃法修正案 幫五都闖錢關。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪敬浤(20110623)。五都半年體檢 磨合篇 行政效率差 民眾洽公要蓋的章多7 個。  延伸查詢new window
10.洪敬浤(20110911)。烤肉禁令 中市一市兩制 縣市合併法規未整併原台中市公園綠地不能烤 大家移到台中縣辦烤肉趴。  延伸查詢new window
11.莊宗勳(20101012)。縣市合併 社團接軌大問題:民間社團 合併或分立 自行協調即可 職業團體一縣市只能有一個 修法或整併未定。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳世宗(20090923)。臺中縣市合併進度 改制作業小組 下月成軍。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳世宗(20120320)。慌!中市高中職改制 政策仍未明 議員憂心預算將年增百億 有如燙手山芋 校長家長也多惶恐 市府指27 日將到教部開會。  延伸查詢new window
14.曾麗芳(20091209)。地方人地方事,台灣省汽車保養公會聯合會理事長柯育沅:縣市合併升格 公會無所適從。  延伸查詢new window
15.馮惠宜(20101219)。改制陣痛期 衙門洽公別跑錯 路名學校問清楚。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃福其(20110625)。五都半年體檢 市民感受篇 市民無感:行政效率沒升格。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊永年(20110518)。總統就職三周年移師臺南 馬臺南演說 文化串南北。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊濡嘉(20100521)。縣市合併後…市一級機關 31 個 增加的局處科長縣府官員優先任用。  延伸查詢new window
19.廖了以(20090703)。縣市合併→三都十五縣 北中南生活圈 平衡城鄉差距。  延伸查詢new window
20.蔡清華(20100831)。縣市合併 公務員組協會自保。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡清華(20101215)。公會社團怎麼併 引發較勁。  延伸查詢new window
22.盧金足(20110802)。臺中市務會議 區長局長互槓。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Brierly, Allen B.(2004)。Annexation as a Form of Consolidation-An Analysis of Central Core City Boundary Expansion in the US during the Twentieth Century。City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
2.Brierly, Allen B.(2004)。Issues of Scale and Transaction Costs in City-County Consolidation。City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Carr, Jered B.(2004)。Perspectives on City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives。City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
4.Johnson, Linda S.(2004)。Revolutionary Local Constitutional Change-A Theory of the Consolidation Process。City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
5.Leland, Suzanne M.、Gary A. Johnson,(2004)。Consolidation as a Local Government Reform: Why City-County Consolidation is an Enduring Issue。City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
6.Savitch, H. V.、Vogel, Ronald K.(2004)。Merger in Louisville-Jefferson County。Case Studies of City-County Consolidation: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape。Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE