The topic of quality of life set out in this paper adopts the concepts in ”The Capability Approach” of Amartya K. Sen. A person's life can be described by one's doings (things one does) and one's beings (roles one takes), both of which constitute the state of the person's life. A person's capability refers to the set of the alternative combinations of states of life that are feasible for one to achieve under the constraints of political, economic, social and natural environments. There are two bases for the assessment of quality of life: One is the size of the capability set. The other is whether one can choose autonomously. The larger the size of the capability set, the more the states of life one can choose, the higher the quality of life a person has. On the other hand, it is also important that one can autonomously choose the state of life which a person evaluates as valuable and meaningful. The origin and also the creator of the quality of life is the individual. The expansion of the capability set is equivalent to the improvement of the quality of life. In addition to individual efforts, family upbringing and school inspiration, some other factors are necessary in order to expand the capability set. The groups one participates in can influence one's values and choices. The corporate social responsibility of enterprises will help the capability development of the general public. Arrangements and guarantees at the institutional and national level can help rule out the factors that are not conducive to capability development and allow individuals to develop their potentials freely and thus, bring about a higher quality of life.