:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公平對待新住民--以沈恩的「能力分析法」來詮釋
書刊名:輔仁社會研究
作者:戴台馨
作者(外文):Day, Daisy Tai-hsing
出版日期:2012
卷期:2
頁次:頁55-79
主題關鍵詞:新住民能力分析法人權公平New residentsCapability approachHuman rightFair
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:103
  • 點閱點閱:51
新住民是國人的外籍配偶及大陸配偶。她們在台灣生活所碰到的共同困難是「人」的尊嚴不受尊重。外籍配偶特有的困難是:語言與文化的適應和無能力教養子女。大陸配偶特有的困難則是:就業困難、經濟拮据等。民調顯示:台灣社會對待東南亞和大陸女性配偶「不公平」,不少民眾卻認為是「適當」的。我們認為值得去釐清這種現象的「應然面」。本文先簡介沈恩(Amartya Sen)的「能力分析法」(capability approach);接著以「能力分析法」當作工具,探討「什麼是公平?」,並以諾思邦(Martha Nussbaum)所條列的十項重要人類能力作為檢驗標準,逐項省思台灣新住民所欠缺的能力。當前新住民最迫切需要的能力有二:一是聽、說、讀、寫能力的培養,及二是不受歧視的自由,尤其是工作機會的欠缺。前者之養成,不僅能增進外籍配偶的安全感,還有惠及子女教育的外溢效果;後者則有賴人權理念的加強。新住民亦為人子、人妻、人母;公平對待她們,原本就是理所當然的。台灣少子化現象近來已受到社會各階層廣泛的注意,讓新住民家庭及子女順利融入台灣主流社會,是保障未來族群和睦相處的要件。
The ”new residents” are the spouses of local Taiwanese who are foreign or mainland Chinese in origin. The most common problem they encounter living in Taiwan concern the lack of respect for human dignity. Specific problems of foreign spouses include language and cultural adaptation as well as problems parenting their children. Spouses from the mainland have particular difficulties in employment opportunities and financial inadequacy.Polls show that there is ”unfair” treatment of new residents by Taiwanese society. However, many Taiwanese think that this phenomenon is ”appropriate.” We consider it worthwhile to clarify the normative implications of this type of behavior.Firstly, we propose Amartya Sen's ”capability approach” in this paper. Secondly, capability approach is used as a tool to explore the topic ”What is fair?” Thirdly, based on Martha Nussbaum's 10 key items on her capability list, we examine the capabilities which new residents need to acquire. Currently, there are two important attributes that are quite crucial. One is language skills or the ability to read, write, speak and comprehend Chinese. The other is freedom from discrimination. The former is needed to develop a sense of security for foreign spouses. It also has the spillover effect of benefiting their children's education. The latter is dependent on the strengthening of the concept of human rights.New residents in Taiwan also include the children, spouses, and parents of the spouses. It is right that fair treatment is given to them. With the alarming decline in birth rate in Taiwan, it is important that families and children of the new residents integrate smoothly into mainstream society to guarantee future ethnic harmony.
期刊論文
1.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2003)。Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice。Feminist Economics,9(2/3),33-59。  new window
2.戴台馨(20090400)。自由與市場社會:以發展觀點為檢視基礎。社會科學論叢,3(1),32-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.翁毓秀(20060600)。為新住民建構社會包容的家庭政策。社區發展季刊,114,61-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Sen, A. K.(2004)。Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation。Feminist Economics,10(3),77-80。  new window
5.邱汝娜、林維言(20040300)。邁向多元與包容的社會--談現階段外籍與大陸配偶的照顧輔導措施。社區發展季刊,105,6-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳志柔、于德林(20051200)。臺灣民眾對外來配偶移民政策的態度。臺灣社會學,10,95-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.戴台馨(1996)。一位經濟學家的人觀與歸宿(追思夏道平先生)。經濟前瞻,11(2),138-139。  延伸查詢new window
8.戴台馨(2011)。從經濟思想家Amartya Sen的「發展」觀點談身心障礙生的潛能發展。全人教育學報。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.李俊湖(2006)。新住民及其子女的教育與輔導。硏習資訊,23(5),53-57。  延伸查詢new window
10.戴台馨(2011)。生活品質與能力發展。輔仁社會硏究,1,29-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Robeyns, Ingrid(2005)。The Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey。Journal of Human Development,6(1),93-114。  new window
12.Sen, A. K.(2005)。Human Rights and Capabilities。Journal of Human Development,6(2),151-166。  new window
13.Sen, A.K.(2008)。The Idea of Justice。Journal of Human Development,9(3),331-343。  new window
14.Uyan-Semerci, P.(2007)。A Relational Account of Nussbaum's List of Capabilities。Journal of Human Development,8(2),203-221。  new window
15.Maddox, B.(2008)。What Good is Literacy? Insights and Implications of the Capabilities Approach。Journal of Human Development,9(2),185-203。  new window
16.Qizilbash, M.(1996)。Capabilities。Well-Being and Human Development,33(2),143-162。  new window
17.Robeyns, I.(2003)。Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities。Feminist Economics,61-92。  new window
圖書
1.Sen, Amartya(1980)。Equality of What?。The Tanner Lectures on Human Values。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.張佛泉(1954)。自由與人權。台北市:臺菁出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Asian Forum For Human Rights and Development, International Human Rights Internship Program、輔仁大學社會文化研究中心(2005)。人權鏈環:經濟、社會及文化權。輔仁大學社會文化研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sen, Amartya K.(1999)。Development as Freedom。New York:Random House。  new window
5.孫震(2004)。審慎、公正與仁慈。理當如此。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.夏道平(1989)。經濟自由化與市場秩序。自由經濟的思路。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.夏曉鵑(2004)。面對新移民。中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
8.狄明德(2008)。人:工作的目的。生活品質之泉源。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.殷海光(1965)。自由的倫理基礎。殷海光選集思想與方法。上海市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Sen, Amartya K.(1987)。The standard of living: Lecture II, lives and capabilities。The standard of living。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Sen, A. K.(1987)。The Standard of Living: Lecture II, Lives and Capabilities。The Standard of Living。Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Sen, A. K.(1988)。The Concept of Development。Handbook of Development Economics。Amsterdam, Dutch:Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE