In Mozi, the four chapters "Canon I," "Canon II," "Exposition of Canon I," and "Exposition of Canon II," plus "Major Illustrations" 大取 and "Minor Illustrations" 小取were called Mo jing 墨經 or the Mohist Canon (Mo bian 墨辯). Lu Sheng 魯勝, a Jin dynasty scholar who annotated the Mohist Canon, believed theories from Hui-Shi, Gongsun Long and other Logicians came after and were highly related to Mo jing. Since then, the relationship between Mo jing and the Logicians, and their corresponding developmental chronology have been highly disputed among scholars. This study compares Hui-Shi's "Ten Paradoxical Propositions" 歷物十 事 with "Canon I," "Canon II," "Exposition of Canon I," and "Exposition of Canon II", and argues that Hui-Shi's "Ten Paradoxical Propositions" were meant to point out that human beings focus on the relativity of things but neglect the absoluteness, and to highlight the meaning of "all in one" 萬物一體 by attempting to see the absolute from the relative. The content of Mo jing seems diametrically opposed to "Ten Paradoxical Propositions" on the surface; in fact, its thesis often only refers to the definition which actually reconciled with Hui-Shi's theory. Judging from these, we can ascertain that the content of Mo jing was definitely not a counteraction to Hui-Shi's theory. In addition, there are paradoxes in "moving problems" in the Mo jing, but not in Hui-Shi's theory. Based on these, the author infers that Hui-Shi came after Mo jing on the presupposition that the later in history we look, the more meticulous the logic of philosophy is, thus enabling Hui-Shi to learn from the mistakes in Mo jing