期刊論文| 1. | Olazábal, Ann Morales(2006)。Loss Causation in Fraud-on-the-Market Cases Post-Dura Pharmaceuticals。Berkeley Bus. L. J.，3(2)，337-380。   |
| 2. | Coffee, John C. Jr.(2005)。Causation by Presumption? Why the Supreme Court should Reject Phantom Losses and Reverse Broudo。Business Lawyer，60，533-548。 |
| 3. | Duffy, Michael(2005)。'Fraud on the market': Judicial approaches to causation and loss from securities nondisclosure in the United States, Canada and Australia。Melbourne University Law Review，29，621-664。 |
| 4. | Goldberg, John C. P.、Sebok, Anthony J.、Zipursky, Benjamin C.(2006)。SYMPOSIUM: DAN B. DOBBS CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC TORT LAW: The Place of Reliance in Fraud。Ariz. L. Rev.，48，1001+1004。 |
| 5. | Fisch, Jill E.(2009)。Cause for concern: Causation and federal securities fraud。Iowa Law Review，94(3)，811-872。 |
| 6. | Merritt, Andrew L.(1988)。A Consistent Model of Loss Causation in Securities Fraud Litigation: Suiting the Remedy to the Wrong。TEX. L. REV.，66，469-531。 |
| 7. | Black, Barbara(1987)。Commentary: The Second Circuit's Approach to the 'in Connection with' Requirement of Rule 10b-5。Brook. L. Rev.，53，539。 |
| 8. | Escoffery, David S.(2000)。A Winning Approach to Loss Causation under Rule 10b-5 in Light of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995(PSLRA)。FORDHAM L. REV.，68，1781。 |
| 9. | Skey, Elizabeth(2009)。The Private Securities Fraud Claim: What Has Duras Effect Been on the Standard for Loss Causation at Summary Judgment?。Santa Clara L. Rev.，49，565。 |
| 10. | Kant, Jacob M.(2006)。Notes, Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo: Not Really a Loss Causation Case。La. L. Rev.，67，257。 |
| 11. | Neas, Jerod、Duress, Dura(2007)。The Supreme Court Mandates a More Rigorous Pleading and Proof Requirement for Loss Causation under Rule 10b-5 Class Actions。U. Colo. L. Rev.，78，347。 |
| 12. | Mone, Mathias E.、Pachter, Tamar(1989)。Opposing Proof of Reliance and Causation。PLI/ Corp，653，721。 |
| 13. | Kaufman, Michael J.(1991)。Loss Causation: Exposing A Fraud on Securities Law Jurisprudence。Ind. L. Rev.，24，357-397。 |
| 14. | Thorson, Ryan S.(2005)。Securities Law--The Artificially Inflated Purchase Price Theory: An Economically Sound yet Legally Insufficient Method of Pleading and Proving Loss Causation, Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo。S. Ct.，125，1627。 |
| 15. | Thorson, Ryan S.(2006)。Securities Law--The Artificially Inflated Purchase Price Theory: An Economically Sound yet Legally Insufficient Method of Pleading and Proving Loss Causation, Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo。Wyo. L. Rev.，6，623。 |