:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:證券詐欺損失因果關係之再思考--從美國最高法院Dura案後之發展觀察
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:張心悌
作者(外文):Chang, Hsin-ti
出版日期:2021
卷期:117
頁次:頁55-131
主題關鍵詞:損失因果關係損害因果關係證券詐欺Dura案財報不實更正揭露灌水股價Loss causationSecurities fraudDura v. BroudoFalse financial statementCorrective disclosureInflated price
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.莊永丞(20110400)。由美國Dura v. Broudo案反思證券投資人之損害因果關係。東吳法律學報,22(4),99-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2005)。Causation by Presumption? Why the Supreme Court should Reject Phantom Losses and Reverse Broudo。Business Lawyer,60,533-548。  new window
3.郭大維(20050200)。我國證券詐欺訴訟「因果關係」舉證之探討--以美國法為借鏡。月旦法學教室,28,79-90。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳俊仁(20091200)。論Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo:美國證券詐欺因果關係要件之再建構與對我國證券交易法制之啟示。歐美研究,39(4),713-767。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hill, Evan(2010)。The Rule 10b-5 Suit: Loss Causation Pleading Standards in Private Securities Fraud Claims After Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo。Fordham Law Review,78,2659-2700。  new window
6.Merritt, Andrew L.(1988)。A Consistent Model of Loss Causation in Securities Fraud Litigation: Suiting the Remedy to the Wrong。TEX. L. REV.,66,469-531。  new window
7.Kaufman, Michael J.(1991)。Loss Causation: Exposing A Fraud on Securities Law Jurisprudence。Ind. L. Rev.,24,357-397。  new window
8.王千維(19981200)。民事損害賠償責任法上因果關係之結構分析以及損害賠償之基本原則。政大法學評論,60,201-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.劉連煜(20140900)。財報不實損害賠償之真實價格如何認定及投資人是否與有過失問題--最高法院一○二年度臺上字第一二九四號等民事判決研究。月旦法學,232,234-245。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.戴銘昇(20120700)。美國證券詐欺損失因果關係要件之研究。法令月刊,63(7),66-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Langevoort, Donald C.(2015)。Judgment Day for Fraud-on-the-market: Reflections on Amgen and the Second Coming of Halliburton。Arizona Law Review,57,37-59。  new window
12.邵慶平(20060200)。證券訴訟上「交易因果關係」與「損害因果關係」之認定--評析高雄地院九一年重訴字第四四七號判決。臺灣本土法學雜誌,79,47-66。  延伸查詢new window
13.賴英照(20190100)。橫看從寬側從嚴--美國證券詐欺民事責任的司法論辯。臺灣財經法學論叢,1(1),1-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.莊永丞(20050300)。證券交易法第二十條證券詐欺損害估算方法之省思。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,34(2),123-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Korsmo, Charles R.(2014)。Market Efficiency and Fraud on the Market: The Danger of Halliburton。Lewis & Clark Law Review,18(4),827-892。  new window
16.陳盈如(20160914)。證券詐欺損失因果關係之風險實現理論。臺灣法學雜誌,303,111-126。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭婷嫻(20190900)。論對市場詐欺理論於美國法制動態與我國實務運用更迭。東海大學法學研究,58,143-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Ferrell, Allen、Saha, Atanu(2007)。The Loss Causation Requirement for Rule 10b-5 Causes of Action: The Implications of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo。BUS . L AW.,63,163-186。  new window
19.Gulati, Mita、Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.、Langvoort, Donald C.(2004)。Fraud by Hindsight。Nw. U. L. REV.,98,773-825。  new window
20.King, S. Austin(2014)。Proffering the Right Evidence: Proving Loss Causation and Damages under SEC Rule 10b-5。N. C. BANKING I NST.,18,431-455。  new window
21.Mustokoff, Matthew L.、Mazzeo, Margaret E.(2017)。Loss Causation on Trial in Rule 10b-5 Litigation a Decade after Dura。RUTGERS U. L. REV.,70,175-219。  new window
22.Prentice, Robert A.(2013)。Behavioral Economics Applied: Loss Causation。LOY. U. CHI . L. J.,44,1509-1565。  new window
23.Pritchard, Adam C.(2015)。Halliburton II: A Loser's History。Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy,10,27-55。  new window
24.Pritchard, Adam C.、Thompson, Robert B.(2018)。Securities Law in the Sixties: The Supreme Court, the Second Circuit, and the Triumph of Purpose Over Text。NOTRE DAME L. REV.,94,371-431。  new window
25.Rapp, Robert N.(2015)。Plausible Cause: Exploring the Limits of Loss Causation in Pleading and Proving Market Fraud Claims under Securities Exchange Act §10(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5。OHIO N. U. L. REV.,41(2),389-482。  new window
26.Steckman, Laurence A.、Conner, Robert E.、Taylor, Kris Steckman(2015)。Loss Causation, Economic Loss Rules and Offset Defenses-- Dismissal Motion Practice after Acticon A.G. v. China North East Petroleum Holdings LTD。TOURO L. REV.,31,501-520。  new window
27.Eisenhofer, Jay W.、Jarvis, Geoffrey C.、Banko, James R.(2004)。Securities Fraud, Stock Price Valuation and Loss Causation: Toward a Corporate Finance-based Theory of Loss Causation。Business Lawyer,59(4),1419-1445。  new window
28.Thorsen, Madge S.、Kaplan, Richard A.、Hakala, Scott(2006)。Rediscovering the Economics of Loss Causation。Journal of Business and Securities Law,6,93-126。  new window
29.Splinder, James C.(2007)。Why Shareholders Want their CEOs to Lie More after Dura Pharmaceuticals。GEO. L. J.,95,653-691。  new window
圖書
1.劉連煜(2020)。現代證券交易法實例研習。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.賴英照(2020)。最新證券交易法解析。  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(2015)。侵權行為法。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張心悌(2009)。論證券詐欺之損失因果關係--以美國最高法院Dura案為出發。企業與金融法制--余雪明大法官榮退論文集。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉連煜(2006)。財報不實之損害賠償責任:法制史上蜥蜴的復活?--證券交易法新增訂第二十條之一的評論。公司法理論與判決研究。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE