臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：岩象分析方法於考古研究之應用：以臺東縣舊香蘭遺址砂岩質石器及陶片為例
書刊名：南島研究學報
作者：楊小青／李坤修／陳文山 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Hsiaochin／Lee, Kunhsiu／Chen, Wenshan
出版日期：2012
卷期：3:2
頁次：頁71-88
主題關鍵詞：岩象分析；舊香蘭遺址；砂岩質石器；龜山式陶片；Petrographic analysis；Chiu-hsian-lan site；Sandstone artifacts；Kueishan style pottery
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:101
岩象分析方法（petrographic analysis）自1970年代開始便廣泛地應用於沉積物來源地分析，本研究利用此發展成熟的技術，以偏光顯微鏡針對舊香蘭遺址出土之9件砂岩質石器進行礦物及岩屑組成分析，了解遺址出土的砂岩質石器的可能原料來源地，也採集遺址鄰近區域出露的富岡砂岩、恆春半島的樂水層、里龍山層、石門層砂岩樣本加以分析比對。舊香蘭遺址同時也出土大量帶有豐富紋飾的所謂「龜山式陶片」，這類陶片僅在恆春的龜山遺址、花蓮的花岡山遺址以及臺東的三和、初鹿、山棕寮、大鳥萬、下多良等遺址零星出現，為了解舊香蘭與恆春及花蓮地區的「龜山式陶片」的關聯性，本研究同時分析了10件帶有複雜印紋的陶片與前人研究成果加以比較，嘗試重建過去舊香蘭人對自然資源的運用及陶器的交換關係。
Petrographic analysis has been broadly applied to the studies on sandstone compositions and its source area. In this paper, we try to use the well developed analytical techniques to reveal the provenance of sandstone artifacts and the ”Kueishan style” pottery from Chiu Hsian Lan site, which were carried out during the rescued archaeological excavations in 2005 and 2007. In order to discriminate from the provenance of sandstone artifacts, sixteen sandstone samples have also been collected for petrographic analysis from the Loshui Formation, Shihmen Formation and Lilungshan Formation in Henchung Peninsula and Fukang Sandstone in the Coastal Range. According to the Q-Lv-Lm plot, the provenance of Chiu Hsian Lan sandstone artifacts is inferred to be Shihmen or Lilungshan Formation because of the compositions of slate and argillite lithic fragments in sandstones. And to unravel the relationship between variant sites of so called ”Kueishan style” potteries which were sparsely discovered in Kueishan site in Henchun, Huakangshan site in Hualein, and Shanhe, Chulu, Shanchunliao, Taniauwan, Hsiatolian and Chiu Hsian Lan sites in Taitung, ten decorative sherds from Chiu-Hsian-Lan site are also analysed in this study. Combining with the petrographic analyses and radiocarbon data, it is seemed that the Chiu Hsian Lan site is the birthplace of ”Kueishan style” potteries.
期刊論文
1.陳光祖(20110600)。臺灣地區出土銅器及相關遺留芻論。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，82(2)，169-259。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文山、鄂忠信、陳勉銘、楊志成、張益生、劉聰桂、洪崇勝、謝凱旋、葉明官、吳榮章、柯炯德、林清正、黃能偉(2000)。上--更新世臺灣西部前陸盆地的演化--沈積層序與沈積物組成的研究。經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊，13，137-156。  延伸查詢new window
3.李坤修(20090600)。下多良遺址出土陶器上的人形印紋。文化驛站，25，38-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.李坤修(200610)。臺東縣舊香蘭遺址的搶救發掘及其重要的發現。臺東文獻，復刊 12，40-71。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐鐵良(19560900)。臺灣東部海岸山脈地質。臺灣省地質調查所彙刊，8，15-41。  延伸查詢new window
6.李坤修(20020700)。卑南遺址的新發現及新問題。臺東文獻，7(復刊)，40-71。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳文山、鄭穎敏、黃奇瑜(1985)。臺灣南部恆春半島之地質。地質，6(2)，21-38。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳振華、陳文山、王源、陳勉銘(1992)。由臺灣中部前陸砂岩之岩象研究看褶皺逆衝帶之剝蝕歷史。地質，12(2)，147-165。  延伸查詢new window
9.Burr, GS;、Beck, JW、Correge, T、Cabioch, G、Taylow, FW、Donahue, Dj(2009)。Modern and Pleistocene reservoir ages inferred from south Pacific corals。Radiocarbon，51(1)，319-335。  new window
10.Chen,WS(1997)。Lithofacies analyses of the arc-related sequence in Coastal Range, eastern Taiwan。Jounal of Geological Society of China，40(2)，313-338。  new window
11.Chen, WS、Wang, Y.(198812)。The Plio-Pleistocene basin development in the Coastal Range of Taiwan。Acta Geologica Taiwanica，26，37-56。  new window
12.Dickinson, WR(199808)。Petrographic temper provinces of prehistoric pottery in Oceania。Records of the Australian Museum，50(3)，263-276。  new window
13.Dickinson, WR、Luczek, CA(19791200)。Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions。American Association of Petroleum Geological Bulletin，63(12)，322-325。  new window
14.Eglinton, T.、Benitez-Nelson, B.、Pearson, A.、McNichol, A.、Bauer, J.、Druffel, E.(199708)。Variability in radiocarbon ages of individual organic compounds from marine sediments。Science，277(5327)，796-780。  new window
15.Eynatten, H.、Barcelo-Vidal, C.、Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.(200301)。Composition and discrimination of sandstones: a statistical evaluation of different analytical methods。Journal of Sedimentary Research，73(1)，47-57。  new window
16.Ingersoll, RV、Luczek, CA(197912)。Petrology and provenance of Neogene sand from Nicobar and Bengal fans, DSDP sites 211 and 218。Journal of Sedimentary Petrology，49(4)，1217-1228。  new window
17.Ingersoll, RV、Bullard, TF、Ford, RJ、Grimm, JP、Pickle, JD、Sares, Sw(19840301)。The effect of grain size on detrital modes: A test of the Gazzi-Dickinson point counting method。Journal of Sedimentary Petrology，54(1)，103-116。  new window
18.Li, Kuang-ti(2003)。Ceramic remains from Kueishan and discussions relating to the relationship of Formosan Aborigines in Southern Taiwan。Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Science: Collection and Research，16，79-90。  new window
19.Mack, GH(19840301)。Exceptions to the relationships between plate tectonics and sandstone compositions。Journal of Sedimentary Petrology，54(1)，212-220。  new window
20.Mangerud, J.(197206)。Radiocarbon dating of marine shells, including a discussion of apparent age of Recent shells from Norway。Boreas，1(2)，143-172。  new window
21.Moliaroli, E.、Blom, M.、Basu, A.(199111)。Methods of provenance determination tested with discriminant function analysis。Journal of Sedimentary Petrology，61(6)，900-908。  new window
22.Page, BM(19780609)。Franciscan melange compared with olistostromes of Taiwan and Italy。Tectonophysics，47(3/4)，223-246。  new window
23.Plas, L van der、Tobi, AC(196501)。A chart for judging the reliability of point counting results。American Journal of Science，263(1)，87-90。  new window
24.Potter, PE(197807)。Petrology and chemistry of modern big river sands。Journal of Geology，86(4)，423- 449。  new window
25.Sung, QC、Wang, Y.(1984)。Petrofacies of Miocene sediments in the Hengchun Peninsula and its tectonic implication。Proceeding of Geological Association，28，322-325。  new window
26.Stoltman, James B(1997)。A quantitative approach to the petrographic analysis of ceramic thin sections。American Antiquity，54(1)，147-160。  new window
27.Stuiver, M.、Braziunas, Tf(1993)。14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC。Radiocarbon，35(1)，137-189。  new window
28.Teng, LS(1984)。Petrographical study of the Neogene sandstones of the Fanshuliao Formation, northern Coastal Range, Taiwan, (I. Northern Part)。Acta Geologica Taiwanica，20，129-155。  new window
29.Van de Kamp, PC、Leake, BE(19950530)。Petrology and geochemistry of siliciclastic rocks of mixed feldspathic and ophiolitic provenance in the Northern Apennines, Italy。Chemical Geology，122(1/4)，1-20。  new window
研究報告
1.李坤修、葉美珍(2005)。臺東縣舊香蘭遺址搶救發掘計畫期末報告。臺東：國立臺灣史前文化博物館。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋文薰、尹建中、黃士強、連照美、臧振華、陳仲玉、劉益昌(1992)。臺灣地區重要考古遺址初步評估第一階段研究報告。中國民族學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.李光周、鄭永勝、凌平彰、陳維鈞、韓旭東、陳有貝(1985)。墾丁國家公園考古調查報告。國立臺灣大學文學院人類學系。  延伸查詢new window
4.李匡悌(2004)。三舍及社內遺址受相關水利利用工程影響範為搶救考古發掘工作計畫期末報告。臺南縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
5.李坤修、葉美珍協同主持(2007)。臺東縣政府舊香蘭遺址搶救發掘計畫第二期計畫期末報告。  延伸查詢new window
6.李坤修(2010)。臺東縣舊香蘭遺址搶救發掘報告I-文化層與墓葬。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃士強、陳有貝、顔學城(1987)。墾丁國家公圜考古民族調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉益昌、趙金勇(2010)。花岡國中校舍新建工程遺址搶救發掘計畫成果報告書第四冊（新石器時期）。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳文山(1988)。台灣海岸山脈沈積盆地之演化及其在地體構造上之意義(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳有貝、邱水金、李貞瑩(2008)。淇武蘭遺址搶救發掘報告。宜蘭縣：宜蘭縣立蘭陽博物館。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.宋國城(1991)。臺灣地質圖說明書：恆春半島。臺北：經濟部中央地質調査所。  延伸查詢new window
3.Adams, AE、MacKenzie, WS、Guilford C.(1984)。Atlas of sedimentary rocks under the microscope。Longman Scientific & Technical。London：Longman Scientific & Technical。  new window
4.Henderson, Julian(2000)。The science and archaeology of materials: an investigagtion of inorganic materials。London：Routledge Pub。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳文山、王源(1996)。臺灣東部海岸山脈地質。臺灣地質之七。經濟部中央地質調查所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dickinson, WR(1974)。Plate tectonics and sedimentation。Tectonics and Sedimentation。  new window
3.Dickinson, WR(1984)。Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones。Provenance of arenites: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Reidel,。The Netherlands, Reidel。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：332（臺灣：328，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67349977
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上