:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:親子肢體暴力與大學生約會暴力行為之關係--尋找代間傳遞中的危機與轉機
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:孫頌賢 引用關係修慧蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Son-heinHsiu, Hui-lan
出版日期:2005
卷期:28:2
頁次:頁267-296
主題關鍵詞:約會暴力代間傳遞親子肢體暴力Dating violenceIntergenerational transmissionParental physical violence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:94
本研究以「背景-關係」模式,探討親子肢體暴力者,其代間傳遞歷程中,影響約會關係暴力行為發生之危機與轉機因子。背景變項意指使用暴力經驗、不良習慣、兩性中對暴力的認同,關係變項包括關係分化、對權力關係滿意度、是否同居。受試者為有約會經驗之大學生共計1,021人,研究分別篩選出有父子肢體暴力組、母子肢體暴力組、無家暴組進行分析。結果發現:1. 父子或母子肢暴組,其約會暴力皆明顯高於無經驗者;2. 對父子或母子肢暴組而言,高認同兩性暴力是促成約會暴力的主要危機因子;3. 高關係分化與避免同居是該群體的主要轉機因子;4. 同時遭受親子肢暴且高認同暴力者,關係分化能在母子肢暴組中預防遭受輕微、遭受與施加口語、施加性與親密暴力,但關係分化僅在父子肢暴組預防輕微肢體暴力,而避免同居對父子肢暴組遭受或施加性與親密暴力、輕微暴力具保護效果;5. 無家暴組僅發現不良習慣為約會暴力發生的危機因子,而未發現明顯轉機因子。最後針對以上結果進行討論與建議。
This study examines the risk and protective factors that predict violent behaviors of college students during dating, using a background-relationship model. Rish factors were hypothesized to include a person's previous deviant behaviors, his attitude to the use of violence to exert authority. The protective factors include relationship differentiation, satisfy for power, and cohabitation. 1021 effective questionnaires were received from students. The results suggest that: (1) the participants with physical abuse from father or mother have more dating violence than without abuse; (2) For the participants of physical abuse from father or mother, personal attitudes toward the use of violence are risk factors; and (3) dating relationship differentiation and avoidant cohabitation are protective factors; (4) If the participants suffering from parental physical abuse and have high identity of using violence simultaneously, the protective factor is avoidant cohabitation for ones of father's abuse, and the protective factor is relationship differentiation for the ones of mother's abuse; (5) There is a risk factor of personal habits, such as the use of alcohol, for the participants without family abuse. The results are discussed and the limiations of applicability are suggested.
期刊論文
1.Chapple, C. L.(2003)。Examining Intergenerational Violence: Violent Role Modeling or Weak Parental Controls?。Violence and Victims,18(2),143-162。  new window
2.Hines, D. A.、Saudino, K. J.(2003)。Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the revised conflict tactics scales。Violence and Victims,18(2),197-217。  new window
3.Lawson, D. M.、Weber, D.、Beckner, H. M.、Robinson, L.、Marsh, N.、Cool, A.(2003)。Men who use violence: Intimate violence profiles。Violence and Victims,18(3),259-227。  new window
4.Molidor, C.、Tolman, R. M.(1998)。Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence。Violence Against Women,4(2),180-194。  new window
5.Price, E. L.、Byers, E. S.(1999)。The attitudes towards dating violence scales: Development and initial validation。Journal of Family Violence,14(4),351-375。  new window
6.Ronfeldt, H. M.、Kimerling, R.、Arias, I.(1998)。Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence。Journal of Marriage and the Family,60,70-78。  new window
7.Jackson, N. A.(1996)。Observational Experiences of Intrapersonal Conflict and Teenage Victimization: A Comparative Study among Spouse and Cohabitors。Journal of Family Violence,11,371-392。  new window
8.Riggs, D. S.、O'Leary, K. D.(1996)。Aggression Between Heterosexual Dating Partners: An Examination of A Causal Model of Courtship Aggression。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,11(4),519-540。  new window
9.Stith, S. M.、Rosen, K. H.、Middleton, K. A.、Bush, A. L.、Lundeberg, K.、Carlton, R. P.(2000)。The Intergenerational Transmission of Sprouse Abuse: A Meta-analysis。Journal of Marriage and Family,62(3),640-654。  new window
10.Straus, M. A.、Sugarman, D. B.、Boney-McCoy, S.、Hamby, S. L.(1996)。The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-Z): Development and preliminary psychometric data。Journal of Family Issues,17(3),283-316。  new window
11.孫頌賢、修慧蘭(20020300)。以家庭系統觀進行家庭系統測量之研究--以家庭系統分化為例。中華輔導學報,11,125-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Kalmuss, D. S.(1984)。The intergenerational transmission of marital aggression。Journal of Marriage and the Family,46(1),11-20。  new window
13.修慧蘭、孫頌賢(20030900)。大學生約會暴力行為之測量與調查。教育與心理研究,26(3),471-499。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Trinke, S. J.、Henderson, A. J. Z.、Bartholomew, K.、Kwong, M. J.(2003)。The Intergenerational Transmission of Relationship Violence。Journal of Family Psychology,17(3),288-301。  new window
研究報告
1.修慧蘭、孫頌賢(2002)。大學生約會暴力行為之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 90-2413-H-004-010-SSS)。行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊美鳳(2000)。少年犯人格特質及環境背景之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.栗珍鳳(1999)。大學生自我分化和心理社會發展之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.賈紅鶯(1991)。父母自我分化、子女自我分化與子女適應水準之相關研究--Bowen家庭系統理論之驗證(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.江文賢(2001)。大學生約會暴力現象與相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dutton, D. G.(2003)。The Abuse Personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships。New York:The Guilford。  new window
2.Goldenberg, I.、Goldenberg, H.(1996)。Family therapy: An overview。Brooks/Cole。  new window
3.Bandura, Albert(1973)。Aggression: A social learning analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Bowen, M.(1978)。Family therapy in clinical practice。Jason Aronson。  new window
5.Straus, M. A.、Gelles, R. J.、Steinmetz, S. K.(1980)。Behind close doors: Violence in the American Family。Garden City, NY:Anchor Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Riggs, D. S.、O'Leary, K. D.(1989)。The development of a model of courtship aggression。Violence in dating relationship: Emerging social issues。New York:Praeger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE