:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:提倡性別正義之法:定位蘇珊˙歐肯之貢獻
書刊名:思與言
作者:陸品妃
作者(外文):Lu, Pin-fei
出版日期:2013
卷期:51:2
頁次:頁165-209
主題關鍵詞:女性主義蘇珊˙歐肯性別正義人文自由主義性別存有學FeminismSusan Moller OkinGender justiceHumanist liberalismOntological accounts of gender
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:132
當代政治哲學家蘇珊.歐肯(Susan Moller Okin)呈現自由主義進路的性別正義理論,她的分析涵蓋類如因性別所造成的男女前景差異,婚姻家庭中養兒育女的生活,應該怎樣安排才符合分配正義的要求。本文一方面提出如何理解歐肯性別正義觀及其重要性之說明,另一方面則指出其理論限制並討論其它可能。闡述主旨如下。歐肯理論為開展「性別如何得以正義」的論述理路奠基,其性別正義的要求,能夠避免實踐性別時的盲點與誤用,進而促使公民互以公平對待。公民互以公平相待,更將兌現正義的要求。然而我們若以哈斯蘭兒(Sally Haslanger)的區分架構來思考歐肯主張的性別存有觀,亦即解消論(eliminativism),將會發現,此論僅得作為回答「性別如何得以正義」提問的立場之一。另有建構論(constructivism)與自然論(naturalism)等立場,可作為有效的性別正義觀基礎。因而正義社會裡自由又平等的成員,並非一定為歐肯所倡議的無性別(genderless)者。
This article devotes itself to critically introduce Susan Moller Okin's account of gender justice. It first demonstrates the vintage point Okin exemplified in thinking about gender, that is, gender is focused through the lens of justice. Okin's account provides a basis for theorizing in respond to the question 'how gender can be just.' Okin's arguments demand gender justice, which would awaken us avoid wrongs from gender practices and enhance fair treatments among citizens. Second, it concludes that in order to answer the question 'how gender can be just', the ontological account of gender in Okin's gender justice, eliminativism, remains one as valid as the others, constructivism and naturalism. Members in a just society, when free and equal, are not necessarily genderless, as Okin suggested.
期刊論文
1.Antony, Louise M.(2000)。Natures and Norms。Ethics,111(1),8-36。  new window
2.Cohen, Joshua(1992)。Okin on Justice, Gender, and Family。Canadian Journal of Philosophy,22(2),263-282。  new window
3.Haslanger, Sally(2003)。Future Genders?Future Races?。Philosophic Exchange,34,4-27。  new window
4.Jaggar, Alison(1974)。On Sexual Equality。Ethics,84,275-92。  new window
5.Okin, Susan Moller(1992)。Women, Equality, and Citizenship。Queen's Quarterly,99(1),56-71。  new window
6.Russell, J. S.(1995)。Okin's Rawlsian Feminism? Justice in the Family and Another Liberalism。Social Theory and Practice,21(3),397-426。  new window
7.Okin, Susan Moller(1994)。Political liberalism, justice, and gender。Ethics,105(1),23-43。  new window
8.Okin, Susan Moller(2004)。Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate。Fordham Law Review,72(5),1537-1567。  new window
9.Okin, Susan Moller(2005)。'Forty Acres and a Mule' for Women: Rawls and Feminism。Politics, Philosophy & Economics,4(2),233-248。  new window
10.黃競涓(20021200)。性別、公民與公私領域。政治學報,34,1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kittay, Eva Feder、Jennings, Bruce、Wasunna, Angela A.(2005)。Dependency, Difference and the Global Ethic of Longterm Care。The Journal of Political Philosophy,13(4),443-469。new window  new window
12.Fausto-Sterling, Anne(1993)。The Five Sexes: Why male and female are not enough。The Sciences,33(2),20-24。  new window
13.Haslanger, Sally(2001)。Gender and Race: (What) Are They, (What) Do We Want Them to Be?。Noûs,34(1),31-55。  new window
14.吳秀瑾(20050600)。依靠與平等:論Kittay愛的勞動。女學學誌,19,157-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陸品妃(20061200)。「不平等」的平等。政治與社會哲學評論,19,85-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mill, John Stuart、Okin, Susan Moller(1988)。The Subjection of Women。Hackett Publishing Company。  new window
2.Plato、Lindsay, Alexander D.(1993)。Republic。London, UK:Orion Publishing Group。  new window
3.Satz, Debra、Reich, Bob(2009)。Toward Humanist Justice: The Political Philosophy of Susan Moller Okin。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Williams, Bernard(1986)。Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy。Cambridge, UK:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Fausto-Sterling, Anne(2000)。Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality。Basic Books。  new window
6.Okin, Susan Moller(1989)。Justice, Gender, and the Family。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
7.Okin, Susan Moller(1979)。Women in Western Political Thought。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Okin, Susan Moller、Cohen, J.、Howard, M.、Nussbaum, M. C.(1999)。Is multiculturalism bad for women?。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Rawls, John(2005)。Political liberalism。Columbia University Press。  new window
10.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.Grayling, Anthony C.(2005)。.……or is that just what we could do without?,http://newhumanist.org.uky919/or-is-that-just-what-we-could-do-without, 2012/07/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.梁文韜(2004)。性別、家庭與女性主義正義論--評析SusanOkin的社會正義論。知識型構中性別與權力的思想與辯證。臺北:唐山。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cudd, Ann E.(2002)。Rational Choice Theory and the Lessons of Feminism。A Mind of One's Own: feminist essays on reason and objectivity。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
3.Haslanger, Sally(2008)。A Social Constructionist Analysis of Race。Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press。  new window
4.Okin, Susan Moller(1986)。Are Our Theories of Justice Gender-Neutral?。The Moral Foundations of Civil Rights。Totowa, New Jersey:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
5.Okin, Susan Moller(1991)。John Rawls: Justice as Fairness - For Whom?。Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory。College Park, PA:The Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
6.Okin, Susan Moller(1998)。Sexual Orientation and Gender: Dichotomizing Differences。Laws and Nature: Shaping Sex, Preference, and Family。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Scanlon, Thomas M.(2003)。The Diversity of Objections to Inequality。The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Sen, Amartya(1982)。Equality of What?。The Tanner Lectures on Human Values。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Okin, Susan Moller(1989)。Humanist Liberalism。Liberalism and the Moral Life。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Okin, Susan Moller(1998)。Gender, the Public, and the Private。Feminism and Politics。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE