This essay first aims to explain why “inequality” in equality is plausible and their seeming incompatibility is comprehensible. That the incompatibility is merely superficial, rather than genuine, is due to a normative character of equality and its role as one but no exclusive value among others in a conception of justice. After making explicit the characteristics of equality with a standpoint of apparent incompatibility, 1 demonstrate how this vantage point of view allows us to see more clearly the relationship between the demand of equality and a conception of justice for a pluralistic democracy in the following two ways. First, the apparent incompatibility between equality and a demand of pluralistic democracy fits the requirement of diversity of values in achieving a pluralistic democracy; second, since equality is an irreducible value in a conception of justice for a pluralistic democracy, such a conception is only possible when the incompatibility is apparent.