:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:器樂曲的「兩個事實」:Franz Brendel的標題音樂美學
書刊名:臺大文史哲學報
作者:劉彥玲
作者(外文):Liu, Annie Yen-ling
出版日期:2013
卷期:78
頁次:頁165-208
主題關鍵詞:標題音樂新德國樂派黑格爾歷史哲學漢斯利克烏托邦BrendelProgram musicThe New German SchoolHegelian philosophy of historyEduard Hanslick
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:111
漢斯利克於1854年出版的《論音樂美》挑戰了標題音樂的擁護者,但是華格納與李斯特這兩位新德國樂派的重量級作曲家,不是「姍姍來遲」就是並未直接地回應漢斯利克。針對漢斯利克的論點做出直接回應的人,反而是來自支持李斯特與華格納的盟友,Franz Brendel即為其中之一。這位歐洲十九世紀中葉以推動前衛音樂聞名的音樂評論家與音樂史家,是鋼琴炫技家兼作曲家李斯特最堅強的盟友之一,樂劇作曲家華格納的支持者,也是新德國樂派的發言人。他於1856年發表的〈標題音樂〉,係從音樂歷史的角度建構與闡述標題音樂的美學基礎。受到黑格爾歷史哲學的影響, Brendel強調標題音樂是音樂歷史發展中的必然結果,是十九世紀中期前衛音樂的表徵,表達了與漢斯利克陣營相左的美學立場。令人驚訝的是,在〈標題音樂〉中他並未全然推翻漢斯利克的見解;相反的,他的部份論點與漢斯利克產生交集。針對這個部份,加拿大學者 James Deaville認為Brendel試圖透過〈標題音樂〉為整場美學論爭做出一種妥協式的總結。不同於 Deaville的解讀,筆者將檢視與分析 Brendel於〈標題音樂〉所呈現的主要論點,並以他的音樂史論著為輔,呈現這位音樂評論家對標題音樂所抱持的雙重態度。筆者挪用Carl Dahlhaus解釋華格納對器樂曲美學意義的雙重態度,建議將 Brendel看似妥協的態度,視為反應新德國樂派作曲家不同程度地承認器樂曲的「兩種事實」:在強調器樂曲應具有明確的表達性的同時,也不願放棄器樂曲的抽象與不確定性。Brendel那「兼容並蓄」的觀點,體現了他這位浪漫主義者在黑格爾歷史哲學的影響下,於標題音樂美學的論述中所表現出的烏托邦嚮往。
Franz Brendel, one of Franz Liszt's strongest allies and a spokesman for the New German School, was closely engaged in the aesthetic debates concerning program music in the mid-nineteenth century. Influenced by the Hegelian philosophy of history (Geschichtsphilosophie), Brendel's music criticism emphasized the importance of artistic progression that also respected traditional German aesthetics. This dialectical perspective informed his aesthetic defense of program music, which prompted opposition from the adherents of ”absolute music” led by Eduard Hanslick. Although Hanslick's aesthetic treatise On the Musically Beautiful (Vom Musikalisch-Schönen, 1854) would provoke responses from defenders of program music, neither Richard Wagner and Liszt replied immediately to Hanslick. One of the immediate responses to Hanslick from the New German School was offered by Brendel, who examined the historical and aesthetic basis of programmatic music in his article ”Program Music” (”Programmmusik,” 1856). Surprisingly, Brendel did not attempt to refute Hanslick's position; on the contrary, he adopted a conciliatory tone. James Deaville has argued that through the article, Brendel was attempting to conclude the entire aesthetic debate. Differing from Deaville, this paper examines the arguments laid out in Brendel's article along with his other writings to highlight Brendel's dual perspective regarding instrumental music. Adopting a term introduced by Carl Dahlhaus to describe Wagner's complex attitude towards instrumental music, the paper suggests that we conceive Brendel's seemingly compromising tone as a reflection of the ”twofold truth” held by composers of the New German School: the indeterminate quality of German music could coexist with an admission of the representational quality of music. This paper argues that this assimilation of diverse aesthetic positions embodies a utopian aspiration conditioned by Hegelian philosophy and German Romantic ideology.
期刊論文
1.Bonds, Mark Evan(1997)。Idealism and the Aesthetics of Instrumental Music at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century。Journal of the American Musicological Society,50(2/3),372-420。  new window
2.Brendel, Franz(2012)。Aesthetic Amputations: Absolute Music and the Deleted Endings of Hanslick’s Vom Musikalische-Schönen。19th-Century Music,36(1),3-23。  new window
3.Brendel, Franz(1859)。Zur Anbahnung einer Verständigung。NZfM,50/51。  new window
4.Deaville, James(1984)。Anregungen für An Introduction and Index。Periodica Musica,2,1-6。  new window
5.Gur, Golan(2012)。Music and ‘Weltanschauung’: Franz Brendel and the Claims of Universal History。Music & Letters,93(3),350-373。  new window
6.Liszt, Franz(185311)。Wagner’s Tannhäuser。Dwight’s Journal of Music, A Paper of Art and Literature,6(8)。  new window
圖書
1.黑格爾、謝詒徵(1996)。歷史哲學。臺北:水牛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ambros, August Wilhelm(1856)。Die Grenzen der Musik und Poesie。Prag。  new window
3.Besser, J.(1956)。Die Beziehungen Franz Brendels zur Hegelschen Philosophie: ein Beitrag zur Musikanschauung des Schumann-Kreises。Robert Schumann: aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages。Leipzig:Breitkopf und Härtel。  new window
4.Brendel, Franz(1854)。Die Musik der Gegenwart und die Gesammtkunst der Zukunst。Leipzig:Bruno Hinze。  new window
5.Brendel, Franz(1856)。Programmusik。Anregungen für Kunst, Leben und Wissenschaft。Leipzig:C. Merseburger。  new window
6.Brendel, Franz(1859)。Franz Liszt als Symphoniker。Leipzig:C. Merseburger。  new window
7.Brendel, Franz(1861)。Grundzüge der Geschichte der Musik。Leipzig:Matthes。  new window
8.Brendel, Franz(1867)。Geschichte der Musik in Italien, Deutschland und Frankreich von den ersten christlichen Zeiten bis auf die Gegenwart。Leipzig。  new window
9.Brendel, Franz,、Deaville, James(2009)。Advancing an Understanding。Richard Wagner and his World。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Dahlhaus, Carl(1982)。Program Music。Aesthetics of Music。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Dahlhaus, Carl(1989)。The Twofold Truth in Wagner’s Aesthetics: Nietzsche’s Fragment ‘On Music and Words.’。Between Romanticism and Modernism。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
12.Daverio, John(1993)。Nineteenth-Century Music and the German Romantic Ideology。New York:Schirmer。  new window
13.Deaville, James(2002)。The Controversy Surrounding Liszt’s Conception of Program Music。Nineteenth-Century Music: Selected Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference。Aldershot:Ashgate。  new window
14.Grey, Thomas. S.(1995)。Wagner’s Musical Prose: Texts and Contexts。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Grey, Thomas. S.(2011)。Hanslick。The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music。New York:Routledge。  new window
16.Gut, Serge(1986)。Berlioz, Liszt und Wagner. Die franzosischen Komponenten der Neudeutschen Schule。Musikalische undgeistesgeschichtliche Grundlagen der neudeutschen Schule。Munich:Emil Katzbichler。  new window
17.Hanslick, Eduard、Pleasants, Henry(1988)。Hanslick’s Music Criticism。New York:Dover。  new window
18.Hanslick, Eduard(1990)。Vom Musikalisch-Schönen: Ein Beitrag zur Revision der Ästhetik in der Tonkunst。Mainz:Schott Musikwissenschaft。  new window
19.Hanslick, Eduard(1993)。Richard Wagner, und seine neueste oper Tannhaeuser。Sämtliche Schriften。Vienna。  new window
20.Karnes, Kevin(2008)。Music, Criticism, and the Challenge of History。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
21.Liszt, Franz(1897)。Berlioz und seine Harold Symphonies。Gesammelte Schriften。Leipzig。  new window
22.Liszt, Franz(1978)。Berlioz und seine Harold Symphonies。Gesammelte Schriften。Hildesheim。  new window
23.Liszt, Franz(1998)。From Berlioz and his Harold Symphony。Source Readings in Music History。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
24.Schlegel, Friedrich、Eichner, Hans(1957)。Literary Notebooks 1797-1801: Fragmente zur Poesie und Literatur II und Ideen zu Gedichten (1798-1801)。Toronto:University of Toronto Press。  new window
25.Taruskin, Richard(2010)。The Oxford History of Western Music。Oxford University Press。  new window
26.Trippett, David(2009)。The Overture to Tannhäuser。Richard Wagner and His World。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
27.Wagner, Richard(1911)。On the Operatic Poetry and Composition in Particular。Sämtliche Schriften und Dichtungen。Leipzig:Breitkopf & Härtel。  new window
28.Wagner, Richard(1995)。On Franz Liszt’s Symphonic Poems。Wagner’s Musical Prose: Texts and Contexts。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
29.Wagner, Richard(2009)。Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony。Richard Wagner and His World。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
30.DeNora, Tia(1995)。Beethoven and the Construction of Genius: Musical Politics in Vienna, 1792-1803。Berkeley, CA:Los Angeles:University of California Press:University of California Press。  new window
31.Dahlhaus, Carl、Lustig, Roger(1989)。The Idea of Absolute Music。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
32.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、HEGEL, CHARLES(1956)。The Philosophy of History。New York, NY:Dover Publications. Inc.。  new window
33.Rehding, Alexander(2009)。Music and Monumentality: Commemoration and Wonderment in Nineteenth-Century Germany。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
34.漢斯立克、陳慧珊(1997)。論音樂美:音樂美學的修改芻議。台北:世界文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.Dahlhaus, Carl、Whittall, Mary(1985)。Realism in Nineteenth-Century Music。Cambridge University Press。  new window
36.Hanslick, Eduard、Payzant, Geoffrey(1986)。On the Musically Beautiful: A Contribution towards the Revision of the Aesthetics of Music。Indianapolis, Indiana:Hackett Publishing Company。  new window
37.Schlegel, Friedrich、Barnett, Stuart(2001)。On the Study on Greek Poetry。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
38.Liszt, Franz(1978)。Robert Schumann’s Klavierkompositionen: Opus 5, 11,14。Gesammelte Schriften。Hildesheim:Breitkopf und Härtel。  new window
其他
1.Grey, Thomas. S.,Brendel, Karl Franz。Grove Music Online,http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/03929, 20110815。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top