:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:同志教育進/出校園之間:以臺灣同志諮詢熱線的實作方式為例
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:蔡宏富
作者(外文):Tsai, Hung-fu
出版日期:2012
卷期:30
頁次:頁83-136
主題關鍵詞:性別平等教育同志教育臺灣同志諮詢熱線Gender equity educationLGBT educationTaiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:40
《性別平等教育法》於2004年通過至今,有許多性別議題在校園中蓬勃發展,包括同志教育。然而,同志教育雖受到法律保護得以在校園實行,但在實際操作面上,並不如其他性別議題一般容易。本文以台灣同志諮詢熱線為研究對象,分析其進入校園實行同志教育的過程所遭遇的困境,以期能指出目前性別教育中的各種性別議題有中心─邊陲的關係出現。本文發現在整個性別教育當中,同志教育仍處於邊緣位置,此邊緣化的現象並非理所當然。在入班演講上,教師必須處理上級、同儕與家長所帶來的壓力與質疑;在教師研習上,重複的法令規定與議題的一魚多吃,獨厚性騷擾與性侵害防治教育。現實校園中,許多教育者也只把性別教育當成兩性平等,此種以「兩性」平權為核心思維的性別教育觀念,無形中將同志議題邊緣化。最後,本文肯認《性別平等教育法》的立法初衷,但要再進一步落實同志教育,則需有更為建制化的師資培育與有系統的同志課程融入,才能讓同志教育更有力地現身在教室中。
The Gender Equity Education Act of 2004 marked the beginning of gender equity education in schools, including LGBT education. However, the practice of LGBT education has not been successful in Taiwan schools. This study observes the Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association (TTHA) as its focus. Through the experiences of TTHA’s LGBT movement in schools, this work discusses the gap between the law and practice. The findings show that LGBT education remains marginal in gender education. In practice, the curriculum arrangement of a school limits LGBT education, and many educators have considered gender education as a matter of sex equality, which marginalizes LGBT education. Lastly, this study recognizes the original intention of the Gender Equity Education Act. LGBT education would be practiced in classes if it had more institutional developments of teachers and systematic LGBT courses.
期刊論文
1.Rofes, E. E.(1989)。Opening up the classroom closet: Responding to the educational needs of gay and lesbian youth。Harvard Educational Review,59(4),444-453。  new window
2.Smith, G. W.(1998)。The ideology of "fag": The school experience of gay students。The Sociological Quarterly,39(2),309-335。  new window
會議論文
1.李雪菱(2007)。從性別課程設計反思基層教師「性別意識」與「多元家庭」觀:以東台灣七所基層學校為例。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Shepard, C. F.(1990)。Report on the quality of campus life for lesbian, gay, and bisexual students。Los Angeles:Student Affairs Information and Research Office, University of California-Los Angeles。  new window
學位論文
1.吳幸珍(2003)。性別教育外一章-三個國中女同性戀學生的故事(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張喬婷(1999)。異質空間vs.全視空間:台灣校園女同志的記憶.認同與主體性浮現(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王怡元(2004)。在學校體制中女同志族群與非同志族群間族群關係之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, G. W.、王儷靜(2010)。Fag 意識形態:男同志學生的校園經驗。青少年的性。台北市:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.何春蕤(2006)。性侵害性騷擾之性解放。桃園縣中壢市:國立中央大學英文系性/別研究室。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Epstein, D., O(2003)。"I have no idea how to do it": Sex education and teachers' fears。Silenced sexualities in schools and universities。VA:Trentham Books Limited。  new window
4.Filax, G.(2003)。Queer invisiblility: The case of Ellen, Michel, and Oscar。Invisible children in the society and its schools。Mahwah, N.J.:L. Erlbaum Associates Publishers。  new window
5.Filax, G.(2006)。Queer youth in the province of the “severely normal”。Vancouver:UBC Press。  new window
6.Rofes, E. E.(2004)。Martyr-target-victim: Interrogating narratives of persecution and suffering among queer youth。Youth and sexualities: Pleasure, subversion, and insubordination in and out of schools。New York, N.Y:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
其他
1.Berger, J.(19921101)。Teaching about gay life is pressed by chancellor。  new window
2.Brooke, J.(19960228)。To be young gay, and going to high school in Utah。  new window
3.The New York Times (author unknown)(19920516)。Alabama denies aid to gay student groups。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top