:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Aesthetic Learning Processes in Identity Work--Love of the Self and Wanting to Become
書刊名:國際藝術教育學刊
作者:伊莉莎白‧馬姆斯特洛姆
作者(外文):Malmström, Elisabet
出版日期:2013
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁33-90
主題關鍵詞:符號認知整合式教育物質性風格發展Semio-cognitionPeirceIntegrative mode of educationMaterialityStyle becoming
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
學生透過工藝創作,學習自我成長、面對複雜的自我時,需要教師特別的 指導。本文的理論背景是七◦年代以來教育界的「語言轉向」現象。在意象當 道的全球文化環境中,學生應該學習認識藝術行動,例如意象是重要的人類表 達方式,也是自我成長的素材。因此,教師必須瞭解如何透過學生的「藝術(風 格)語言」刺激思考能力。當今教育學科對這種看法有諸多論證,例如Peirce 模式的教育便指出文本的廣義概念,認爲除了聲音話語外,也應討論符號資 源。研究者進而提出一種文本的水平概念,目的也是要賦予言語與符號的記號 行動同等的知識論地位。爲了刺激人類的發展,我傾向從實用符號學角度出 發,我認爲語言與視覺活動不僅涵蓋語言與形象化圖像,同時還包括使用的材 料,這是從溝通通往合作的水平式廣泛看法。學生在藝術行動中顯示出獨特的 表達方法,包括各種變得獨特的方式。我主張以詮釋學模式來瞭解作者採用的 媒介,尋找連結符號行動與心智不同主題的中介點,這是一種記號的符號認知 重建過程。結果顯示學生追尋符號意識與風格時,展現的諸多取向,其意義有 助於自我成長。另一個結果顯示,學生、學生的圖畫/質地以及教師三者之間 的潛在溝通區,將影響學生最終的自我發展。這項研究成果可能啓發未來學校 的美學教育。
The process of learning to become and adequately respond to the complexities of the Self through handmade productions is unlikely to occur without guidance. The support of this article’s idea is the ‘language turn’ of education from the 70s. It also seems important that students learn about art-action in an image-based global culture, including how images are important forms of human expression and substance in becoming. Thus teachers need to know how they give instructions to stimulate thinking through students’ languages of arts (style). Educational sciences of today support this idea where a Peircean mode of education gives support to a wide concept of the text including semiotic resources other than the verbal language. Researchers thus proclaim a horizontal concept of the text for the same purpose of giving equal epistemological status to verbal and semiotic sign-action. For the purpose of stimulating humans’ becoming, I argue for a pragmatic semiotic perspective and that language and visual action do not only include the linguistic and the figurative picture but also the material used, a wide and horizontal view on communication to cooperation. The students show unique ways of art in action, including means to become unique. My Aesthetic Learning processes in identity work -Love of the self and wanting to become unique.My method to find out about mediation of different themes to connect sign -action and mind builds on a hermeneutic model of mediation made by the author; it is a semio-cognitive re-construction of the sign. The result shows features to the students’ different processes of orientation to sign-mindedness and style through which meanings are accessible to becoming. Another result is that the zone of proximal comm unication between students and students’ pictures/texture and teachers makes a difference to the student’s ultimate unique becoming. The result could be of great importance to school aesthetics in the future.
期刊論文
1.Bergman, M.(2005)。C. S. Peirce's dialogical conception of sign processes。Studies in Philosophy and Education,24(3),213-234。  new window
2.Biesta, G. J. J.(2004)。Against learning? Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning。Nordic Educational Research,24(1),70-82。  new window
3.Biesta, G. J. J.(2005)。Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning (Reprint for 25th Anniversary Issue of Nordic Educational Research. Selected as one of the three most significant articles in the 25-year history of the journal)。Nordic Educational Research,25(1),54-66。  new window
4.Biesta, G. J. J.(2009)。Good Education in an Age of Measurement。Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,21(1),33-46。  new window
5.Birgerstam, P.(2002)。Intuition - the Way to Meaningful Knowledge。Studies in Higher Education,27(4),431-444。  new window
6.Colapietro, V. M.(2005)。Cultivating the arts of inquiry, interpretation, and criticism: A Peircean approach to our educational practices。Studies in Philosophy and Education,24(3),337-366。  new window
7.Colapietro, V. M.、Midtgarden, T.、Strand, T.(2005)。Introduction, Peirce and education: The conflicting process of learning and discovery。Studies in Philosophy and Education,24(3),167-177。  new window
8.Fritzell, C.(2009)。Kvalificerade samtal: kunskap - mening - bildning。Pedagogik, kommunikation,5。  new window
9.Lobman, C. L.(2011)。Democracy and Development: The Role of Outside-of-School Experiences in Preparing Young People to Be Active Citizens。Democracy & Education,79(1),1-9。  new window
10.Malmström, E.(2011)。Beyond the Word, within the Sign - Inquiry into pre- school children's handmade pictures about schooling。Education Inquiry,2(1),111-126。  new window
11.Malmström, E.(2013)。Bild och pedagogikens estetiska språk - En analys av nationella styrdokument。Utbildning & Demokrati,22(1),109-135。  new window
12.Marner, A.、Örtegren, H.(2003)。En kulturskola for alla - estetiska ämnen och läroprocesser i ett mediespecifikt och medieneutralt perspektiv。Forskning i fokus,16。  new window
13.Sonesson, G.(2010)。Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding。Semiotica,179,145-258。  new window
14.Uslucan. H. H.(2004)。Charles Sanders Peirce and the Semiotic Foundation of Self and Reason。Mind, Culture and Activity,11(2),96-108。  new window
15.Ventimiglia, M.(2005)。Three educational orientations: A Peircean perspective on education and the growth of the self。Studies in Philosophy and Education,24(3),291-308。  new window
16.Wertsch, J. V.(1979)。From social interaction to higher psychological processes。Human Development,22,1-22。  new window
會議論文
1.Malmström, E.(2007)。Reflections on a didactical socio-semiotic orientation to sign-mindedness and learning - Peirce's Semiotic and Pedagogy。VIIIth Conference of the AISV-IAVS (Association internationale de sémiotique visuelle, International Association for Visual Semiotics, Asociación internacional de semiótica visual),(會議日期: 2007, may 29-june 2)。Istanbul:Kültür Üniversitesi。  new window
2.Malmström, E.(2011)。Integrative Art Inquiry into early childhood fine art education。The meeting of the 8th Pan Hellenic Conference。Cyprus。  new window
研究報告
1.Harland, J.、Kinder, K.、Haynes, J.、Schagen, I.(1998)。The Effects and Effectiveness of Arts Education in Schools。Slough:NFER。  new window
圖書
1.Ahlner Malmström, E.(1998)。En analys av sexåringars bildspråk - bilder av skolan。Lund, Sweden:Lund University Press。  new window
2.Bergman, M.(2004)。Fields of signification- Explorations in Charles S. Peirce's theory of signs。Helsinki:University of Helsinki。  new window
3.Bergman, M.(2009)。Peirce's philosophy of communication: The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs。New York:Continuum International Publishing Group。  new window
4.Bergström, G.、Boréus, K.(2005)。Textens mening och makt. Metodbok i samhällsvetenskaplig text- och diskursanalys。Lund:Studentlitteratur。  new window
5.Biederman, H.(1997)。Symbollexikonet。Stockholm, Sweden:Forum。  new window
6.Biesta, G. J. J.(2007)。Det här är min sanning, berätta din. Dekonstruktiv pragmatism som filosofi for utbildning。Erfarenheter av pragmatism。Lund, Sweden:Studentlitteratur。  new window
7.Colapietro, V. M.(1989)。Peirce's approach to the self - A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
8.Comber, B.、Nixon, H.(2005)。Children Reread and Rewrite their Local Neighborhoods: Critical Literacies and Identity Work。Literacy Moves on. Popular Culture, New Technologies, and Critical Literacy in the Elementary Classroom。Portsmouth:NH Heinemann。  new window
9.Dewey, J.(1911)。How we think。Boston, USA:D. C. Heath & Co., Publishers。  new window
10.Dewey, J.(1983)。Människans natur och handlingsliv。Göteborg:Daidalos。  new window
11.Doumas, K.(2011)。Students' experiences and perceptions of good teaching practice。Division of Education, Department of Sociology, Lund:Lund University。  new window
12.Habermas, J.(1990)。Kommunikativt handlande - Texter om språk, rationalitet och samhälle。Uddevalla:Daidalos。  new window
13.Honneth, A.(2003)。Erkännande。Uddevalla:Daidalos。  new window
14.Johansen, J., D.、Larsen, S., E.(1994)。Tegn in Brug。Denmark:Amanda。  new window
15.Lenz Taguchi, H.(2010)。Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education - Introducing an intra-active pedagogy。London & New York:Routledge。  new window
16.Liedman, S-E.(2006)。Stenarna i själen - form och materia från antiken till idag。Stockholm, Sweden:Albert Bonniers Förlag。  new window
17.Lindström, L.(2000)。Att lära genom konsten。CUNEIFORM. About the Arts and mathematics in learning。Stockholm, Sweden:Carlssons。  new window
18.Malmström, E.(2001)。En rörelse mellan aning och insikt om framtiden。Pedagogik for intuition。Lund, Sweden:University of Lund。  new window
19.Malmström, E.(2006)。Estetisk pedagogik och lärande - processer i bildskapandet, delaktighet och erkännande。Stockholm, Sweden:Carlssons。  new window
20.Peirce, C. S.(1931)。Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (CP) Chales Hartshorne。In the article references are made to CP, followed by the number of volume and paragraph。Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
21.Sjölin, J-G.(1993)。Att tolka bilder。Lund, Sweden:Studentlitteratur。  new window
22.Sonesson, G.(1989)。Pictorial concepts - Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world。Lund, Sweden:Lund University Press。  new window
23.Sonesson, G.(1992)。Bildbetydelser。Lund, Sweden:Studentlitteratur。  new window
24.Svensson, L.(2009)。Introduktion till pedagogik。Stockholm, Sweden:Nordets Akadeniska förlag。  new window
25.Vygotskij, L.(1930)。Fantasi och kreativitet i barndomen。Göteborg, Sweden:Daidalos。  new window
26.Säljö, R.(2000)。Lärande i praktiken - Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv。Stockholm, Sweden:Prisma。  new window
27.Wallenstein, S-O.(2001)。Bildstrider- Föreläsningar om estetisk teorl。Finland:Alfabeta bokförlag。  new window
28.Vygotsky, L.(1924)。The Psychology of Art。Cambridge:The M. I. T. Press。  new window
29.Vygotsky, L.(1935)。Mind and Society。Cambridge:Harvard University。  new window
30.Kress, Gunther R.(2010)。Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication。Routledge。  new window
31.Piaget, Jean、Gattegno, C.、Hodgson, F. M.(1951)。Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood。New York:W. W. Norton。  new window
32.Gorlée, D. L.(1994)。Semiotics and the Problem of Translation。Amsterdam:Atlanta, GA。  new window
33.Jarvis, P. J.(1992)。Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
34.Dewey, J.(1916)。Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
35.Dewey, J.(1934)。Art as experience。New York:Perigee Books。  new window
36.Wertsch, J. V.(1991)。Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action。Harvard University Press。  new window
37.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.、Weaver, H.(1969)。The Psychology of the Child。New York, NY:Basic Book。  new window
38.Polkinghorne, D.(1983)。Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wertsch, J. V.(1985)。The semiotic mediation of mental life: L. S. Vygotsky and M. M. Bakhtin。Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectivesn。Orlando:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top