:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以徑路搜尋分析建構大學圖書館網站之研究
書刊名:教育資料與圖書館學
作者:謝建成 引用關係廖婉竹
作者(外文):Shieh, Jiann-cherngLiao, Wan-chu
出版日期:2013
卷期:50:4
頁次:頁597-626
主題關鍵詞:卡片分類法相似性評定群集分析徑路搜尋分析尋獲度Card sortingSimilarity ratingCluster analysisPathfinder analysisFindability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:36
卡片分類法及集群分析是資訊架構研究中最常運用的方法之一,然而教育心理領域廣為運用的知識結構引出與知識結構表徵工具則為相似性評定與徑路搜尋分析。本研究主要探討如何將相似性評定及徑路搜尋分析運用於圖書館網站架構之建置及其所網站尋獲度之效益。本研究以國立臺灣師範大學圖書館作為研究個案網站,隨機選取30位在校學生為受試者,針對篩選之網站標籤進行卡片分類及相似性評定,再以及群分析與徑路搜尋分析建立四組不同之網站架構,最後以隨機方式選取另外120位在校學生以選定任務進行尋獲度實驗。經由統計分析得知:卡片分類及相似性評定在尋獲度上並無顯著差異;然而若是以卡片分類為知識引出方法,則徑路搜尋分析與集群分析在尋獲度上會有顯著差異。
Card sorting and cluster analysis are the methods applied most frequently in information architecture studies. However, the similarity rating and pathfinder analysis have been widely adapted to structural knowledge elicitation and presentation in educational psychology studies. This study investigated how similarity rating and pathfinder analysis are used to construct library websites and what are their effects. We took the National Taiwan Normal University Library website as our study case. Randomly 30 students were selected as the subjects to conduct card sorting or similarity rating on the picked out site labels. Next we applied cluster analysis and pathfinder analysis to the above results to generate four websites. Finally, we again randomly selected 120 students into four groups to conduct findability tests on four websites respectively. By the statistical analysis, we concluded that there is no significant difference between card sorting and similarity rating on findability; however, if card sorting is applied to structural knowledge elicitation, there will be significant difference between cluster analysis and pathfinder analysis on findability.
期刊論文
1.Kaufman, J.(2006)。Card sorting: An inexpensive and practical usability technique。Intercom,53(9),17-19。  new window
2.Maiden, N. A. M.、Hare, M(1998)。Problem domain categories in requirements engineering。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,49(3),281-304。  new window
3.Upchurch, L.、Rugg, G.、Kitchenham, B.(2001)。Using card sorts to elicit web pages quality attributes。IEEE Software,18(4),84-89。  new window
4.Paul, C. L.(2008)。A Modified Delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology。Journal of Usability Studies,4(1),7-30。  new window
5.Fincher, S.、Tenenberg, J.(2005)。Making sense of card sorting data。Expert Systems,22(3),89-93。  new window
6.謝建成、丁依玲、陳慧倫(20110700)。大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究。資訊管理學報,18(3),25-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.謝建成、吳怡青(20100300)。改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋獲度之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,47(3),245-282。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Goldsmith, T. E.、Johnson, P. J.、Acton, W. H.(1991)。Assessing structural knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),88-96。  new window
9.Cooke, N. M.、McDonald, J. E.(1987)。The application of psychological scaling techniques to knowledge elicitation for knowledge based systems。International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,26(4),533-550。  new window
10.Hudson, W.(2005)。Playing your cards right: getting the most from card sorting for navigation design。Interactions,12(5),56-58。  new window
11.Wang, P.、Hawk, W. B.、Tenopir, C.(2000)。User’s interaction with world wide web resource: an exploratory study using a holistic approach。Information Processing and Management,36(2),232-236。  new window
會議論文
1.Zimmerman, D. E.、Akerelrea, C.(2002)。A group card sorting methodology for developing informational web sites。Piscataway, NJ:IEEE international。437-445。  new window
2.White, B.(2003)。Web accessibility, mobility, and findability。Web congress, 2003. Proceedings. First Latin American。Los Alamitos, CA:IEEE Computer Society。239-240。  new window
3.Tullis, T.、Wood, L.(2004)。How many users are enough for a card-sorting study?。The Annual Meeting of the Usability Professionals Association,(會議日期: 2004/06/10-06/12)。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
學位論文
1.邱亦秀(2010)。受試者特性對修正型德菲式卡片分類法成效影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡維君(2006)。大學圖書館網站好用性評估:以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Morville, P.(2005)。Ambient Findability: What we find changes who we become。Sebastopol, CA:O'Reilly Media, Inc.。  new window
2.Courage, C.、Baxter, K.(2004)。Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques。San Fransisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann。  new window
3.Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Ablex。  new window
4.Morville, P.、Rosenfeld, L.(2006)。Information Architecture for the World Wide Web。Sebastapol, CA:O'Reilly Sebastapol。  new window
5.Coxon, A. P. M.(1999)。Sorting data: Collection and analysis。Thousand Oaks:Sage。  new window
6.Hahsler, M.、Simon, B.(2001)。User-centered navigation re-design for web-based information systems。Proceedings of the Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2000。Long Beach, CA:Association for Information Systems。  new window
單篇論文
1.McGriff, S. J.,Van Meter, D. P.(2001)。Measuring cognitive structure: An overview of pathfinder networks and semantic networks。  new window
2.McNamara, D. S.,O'Reilly , T.(2004)。Learning: Knowledge representation, organization, and acquisition。  new window
其他
1.Interlink(2004)。The knowledge network organizing tool (KNOT) software,http://interlinkinc.net/KNOT.html., 2013/07/01。  new window
2.(1994)。MATLAB: The language of technical computing,http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/, 2013/07/01。  new window
3.Optimal Workshop(2007)。Online card sorting software,http://www.optimalworkshop.com/optimalsort.htm, 2013/07/01。  new window
4.Nielsen, J.(20040719)。Card sorting: How many users to test,https://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-how-many-users-to-test/, 2010/04/26。  new window
5.Fuccella, J.,Pizzolato, J.(1998)。Creating web site designs based on user expectations and feedback,http://internettg.org/newsletter/june98/web_design.html, 2010/04/26。  new window
6.Hawley, M.(2008)。Extending card-sorting techniques to inform the design of web site hierarchies,http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000332.php。  new window
7.Spencer, D.,Warfel, T.(2004)。Card sorting: a definitive guide,http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide, 2010/04/21。  new window
8.Deaton, M.(2002)。Sorting Techniques for User-centered Information Design,http://www.mmdeaton.com/SortingTechniquesforInformationDesign.pdf, 2012/05/21。  new window
9.Ahlstrom, Y.,Allendoerfer, K.(2004)。Information organization for a portal using a card-sorting technique(D0T/FAA/CT-TN04/31)。,Atlantic City International Airport, NJ:Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical。,http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dot-faa-ct-tn04-31.pdf, 2012/05/14。  new window
10.Boulton, M.(2007)。Card sorting,http://v3.markboulton.co.uk/articles/detail/card_sorting_part_1/, 2012/05/22。  new window
11.Hinkle, V.(2008)。Card-sorting: What you need to know about analyzing and interpreting card sorting results,http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/102/cardsort.asp, 2012/05/22。  new window
12.Robertson, J.(20010219)。Information design using card sorting,http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting/index.html, 2012/05/24。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dearholt, D. W.、Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Properities of pathfinder networks。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Ablex。  new window
2.Durso, F. T.、Coggins, K. A.(1990)。Graphs in the social and psychological sciences: Empirical contributions of pathfinder。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Ablex。  new window
3.Mitchell, A. A.、Chi, M. T.(1984)。Measuring knowledge within a domain。The representation of cognitive structure。Toronto:Ontario Institute for Studies in Education。  new window
4.Martin, S.、Kidwell, D. K.(2001)。A case study in cluster analysis for intranet organization.。Engineering management for appied technology (EMAT 2001): 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology。Los Alamitos, CA:IEEE。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE