:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市街道景觀封閉感之研究
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:陳映均林晏州
作者(外文):Chen, Ying-chunLin, Yann-jou
出版日期:2014
卷期:41:1
頁次:頁99-115
主題關鍵詞:街道空間性質人為設施物植物行道樹StreetSpace characterMan-made structuresPlantsStreet trees
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:104
本研究之主要目的在於探討都市街道中地平面、頂面及垂直面等空間性質所形成之關係,並探討這些空間性質對於街道環境封閉感之影響。為探討此關係性,本研究以台北地區街道空間作為研究對象,透過拍攝實際街道景觀照片做為施測媒介,以繪圖軟體分別抽取街道立面之人工建物、植栽、街道平面之地面、與街道中可見之天空等因子,分別計算其面積。另外請受測者評估照片中街道景觀空間封閉感受程度。分析各項空間因子和街道空間封閉感之關係,結果顯示空間組成因子中天空面積與空間封閉感為顯著負向相關,建築物和植物面積與空間封閉感為顯著正相關。應用複迴歸分析綜合建立街道景觀空間封閉感預測模型,並比較各因子對於空間封閉感受之相對影響程度,可得知立面中的植物面積與人工建物面積越大,空間封閉感受越強,惟植物面積對於空間封閉感之影響程度約為人工建物面積之一半。本研究結果顯示,街道景觀中植物部分是較為軟性之空間阻隔物,可減少人工建物所造成之空間封閉感受。因此未來在有關街道景觀之管制方面應多鼓勵增加植栽或立面綠化,以提昇都市街道之景觀品質、改善都市街道空間感受。
This study investigates the relationships among space characters (base plane, overhead, and verticals) in streets and examines the effect of these characters on enclosure of urban street environments. Streetscape photos in Taipei City, the study site, are used to analyze relationships. The area percentages of sky, man-made structures (buildings), plants, and roads in each photo are measured. Streetscape photos are also used to survey perceptions of streetscape enclosures. Analytical results show that streetscape sky negatively affects enclosure perceptions and buildings and plants positively affect enclosure perceptions. Regression analysis results show that the positive effect of man-made structures is almost double the effect of vertical plants on enclosure perceptions. We conclude that plants in streets have softer space characters than buildings. Study results suggest that planting on streets should be encouraged to improve the quality of city street spaces and streetscapes.
期刊論文
1.Larson, L.、Adams, J.、Deal, B.、Kweon, B. S.、Tyler, E.(1998)。Plants in the Workplace: The Effects of Plant Density on Productivity, Attitudes, and Perceptions。Environment and Behavior,30(3),261-281。  new window
2.Hayward, S. C.、Franklin, S. S.(1974)。Perceived openness-enclosure of architectural space。Environment and Behavior,6(1),37-52。  new window
3.Holden, C.(2000)。The brain's special places。Science,287(2000),1587。  new window
4.Stamps, A. E.(2001)。Evaluating enclosure in urban sites。Landscape and Urban Planning,57(1),25-42。  new window
5.Stamps, A. E.(2005)。Elongation and enclosure。Perceptual and Motor Skills,101(1),303-308。  new window
6.Stamps, A. E.、Smith, S.(2002)。Environmental enclosure in urban settings。Environment and Behavior,34(6),781-794。  new window
7.Ulrich, R. S.(1981)。Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychology sociological effects。Environment and Behavior,13(5),523-556。  new window
8.Kaplan, S.(1987)。Aesthetics, affect and cognition:Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective。Environment and Behavior,19(1),3-32。  new window
9.Herzog, Thomas R.(1984)。A cognitive analysis of preference for field-and-forest environments。Land­scape Research,9(1),10-16。  new window
10.Gold, S. M.(1986)。User characteristics and response to vegetation in neighborhood park。Arboricultural Journal,10(4),275-287。  new window
會議論文
1.歐聖榮、李美芬(2001)。景觀空間封閉感及偏好知覺之研究。2001休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會。臺中。87-105。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王維潔(1991)。南歐廣場探索。台南:宏大出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王濟昌(1984)。景園建築學。台北:台隆書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.林文鎭(1993)。園林之美學。台北:中國造林事業協會。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐聖榮(2000)。景觀空間封閉感及擁擠感之研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝平芳、單玉珍、邱茲容(1981)。植物與環境設計。台北:知音出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Darwin, C.(1993)。The Autobiography of Charles Darwin。New York:Norton。  new window
7.McAndrew, Francis T.、危芷芬(1995)。環境心理學。五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE