臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：CLD建模引導住宅街區友善環境議題推理與思考之演進
書刊名：建築學報
作者：陳美智／張淑貞 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Mei-chih／Chang, Shu-chen
出版日期：2016
卷期：97
頁次：頁119-143
主題關鍵詞：因果推理；系統思考；學習實驗室；CLD模式；友善環境；Causality reasoning；System thinking；Learning laboratory；CLD model；Friendly environment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:106
  • 點閱點閱:14
住宅街區友善環境是國際關注適居城市的重要議題，這議題跨越環境、社會、心理和文化等領域，組成多元、複雜，必須從系統觀整合友善環境議題全貌，才能找到滿足多元需求的辦法。環境設計者擅長的直覺思考，確實可快速解決功能單純和空間使用明確的問題，卻不適合處理屬於複雜系統的友善環境議題。系統動態學方法論(System Dynamics, SD)圖像化「因果回饋環路圖(Causal Loops Diagram, CLD)，具有聚焦問題、整合跨領域多元組成議題、引導因果推理等系統思考特質，擅長處理複雜系統議題。CLD 圖像模式非常適合輔助熟悉圖像閱讀的設計者，處理具系統與複雜特質的友善環境議題時，引導從系統觀演進式地進行問題的推理與思考。本文以城市住宅街區友善環境議題為例，藉由SD 學習實驗室(Learning Laboratory)概念，輔助設計者體驗：「直覺」、「因果推理」和「CLD 建模」三階段推理與思考論壇活動的演進過程。從設計者的學習評論結果，發現「因果推理」和「CLD 建模」二階段在引導整合問題全貌、找出關鍵因素和推理思考友善環境策略過程，確實讓他們建立了處理複雜議題之系統思考能力。
A friendly environment of residential street is a universal issue to the livable city, which components are complex and multi-disciplines like environment, sociology, psychology and culture. The approach for solving this issue must integrate its components through a view of system to find ways to satisfy the multi-demands of the city. Designers have clever intuitional thinking to deal with problems with simple functions and the definite usage of space, but this character is not adaptable for solving the issue of a friendly environment of residential street properly. The graphic 'Causal Loops Diagram (CLD)' of System Dynamics (SD) approach has characters with system thinking, which help to focus on the core of problems, integrate key components of issues with multi-disciplines, and lead causality reasoning to issues with characters of system and complexity. Therefore, the CLD model is fit in with designers who are familiar with figure reading, and lead them to deal with and make progress on reasoning and thinking to the complex issues of friendly environment. By way of the 'Learning Laboratory' of SD approach, this study takes the issue of a friendly environment of city residential street as a case to advance the designers' experiences on three evolution stages of reasoning and thinking forum activities, which are ＂intuition＂, ＂causality reasoning＂, and ＂CLD modeling＂. The results of designers' self-evaluation in the learning laboratory reveled that in processes of leading to have a holistic view to problems, find key components, and develop strategies, the reasoning and thinking activities do really help designers to have the capabilities of system thinking on dealing with the complex issues.
期刊論文
1.Ackoff, R. L.(1994)。Systems thinking and thinking systems。System Dynamics Review，10(2/3)，175-188。  new window
2.Aramburo, S. A.、Acevedo, J. A. C.、Morales, Y. O.(2012)。Laboratory experiments in the system dynamics field。System Dynamics Review，28(1)，94-106。  new window
3.Barlas, Y.(1996)。Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics。System Dynamics Review，12(3)，183-210。  new window
4.Booth Sweeney, L.、Sterman, J.(2007)。Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems。System Dynamics Review，23(2/3)，285-312。  new window
5.Cavaleri, S.、Sterman, J. D.(1997)。Towards evaluation of systems thinking interventions: A case study。System Dynamics Review，13(2)，171-186。  new window
6.Coyle, G.、Exelby, D.(2000)。The validation of commercial system dynamics models。System Dynamics Review，16(1)，27-41。  new window
7.Diehl, E.、Sterman, J. D.(1995)。Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，62(2)，198-215。  new window
8.Doyle, J. K.、Ford, D. N.(1998)。Mental models concepts for system dynamics research。System Dynamics Review，14(1)，3-29。  new window
9.Fenton, M.(2005)。Battling America's epidemic of physical inactivity: Building more walkable, livable communities。Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior，37(Supplement 2)，115-120。  new window
10.Forrester, J. W.(2007)。System dynamics: the next 50 years。System Dynamics Review，23(2/3)，359-370。  new window
11.Graham, A. K.、Senge, P. M.(1990)。Computer-based case study and learning laboratory projects。System Dynamics Review，6(1)，100-105。  new window
12.Gregorian, V.(1993)。Education and our divided knowledge。Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society，137(4)，605-611。  new window
13.Ibrahim, I.(2016)。Livable eco-architecture: Masdar city, Arabian sustainable city. Urban planning and architecture design for sustainable development, UPADSD 14-16 October 2015。Social and Behavioral Sciences，216，46-55。  new window
14.Jan, C. G.(2003)。Policies for developing defense technology in newly industrialized countries: A case study of Taiwan。Technology in Society，25(3)，351-368。  new window
15.Jan, T. S.、Jan, C. G.(2000)。Designing simulation software to facilitate learning of quantitative system dynamics skills: A case in Taiwan。Journal of the Operational Research Society，51，1409-1419。  new window
16.Khan, S.、Luo, Y.、Ahmad, A.(2009)。Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach。Environmental Modelling & Software，24(12)，1363-1372。  new window
17.Kunc, M.(2008)。Using systems thinking to enhance strategy maps。Management Decision，46(5)，761-778。  new window
18.Kunc, M.(2012)。Teaching strategic thinking using system dynamics: Lessons from a strategic development course。System Dynamics Review，28(1)，28-45。  new window
19.Kwan, T.、So, M.(2008)。Environmental learning using a problem-based approach in the field: A case study of a Hong Kong school。International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education，17(2)，93-113。  new window
20.Lane, D. C.(1992)。Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams。European Journal of Operational Research，59(1)，64-84。  new window
21.Marsal-Llacuna, M. L.、Colomer-Llinàs, J.、Meléndez-Frigola, J.(2015)。Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative。Technological Forecasting & Social Change，90，611-622。  new window
22.Martinez-Moyano, I. J.、Richardson, G. P.(2013)。Best practices in system dynamics modeling。System Dynamics Review，29(2)，102-123。  new window
23.Morecroft, J. D. W.(1985)。Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models。Management Science，31(7)，900-915。  new window
24.Morgan, G.(1983)。Rethinking corporate strategy: A cybernetic perspective。Human Relations，36(4)，345-360。  new window
25.Nuhoğlu, H.(2010)。The effect of the system dynamics approach on understanding causal relationship skills in science education。Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences，2，3614-3618。  new window
26.Qudrat-Ullah, H.(2010)。Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study。Computers & Education，55，1277-1286。  new window
27.Richmond, B.(1994)。Systems thinking/system dynamics: Let's just get on with it。System Dynamics Review，10(2/3)，135-157。  new window
28.Rosenthal, A. T.(2003)。Teaching systems thinking and practice through environmental art。Ethics & The Environment，8(1)，153-168。  new window
29.Säumel, I.、Weber, F.、Kowarik, I.(2016)。Toward livable and healthy urban streets: Roadside vegetation provides ecosystem services where people live and move。Environmental Science & Policy，62，24-33。  new window
30.Southworth, M.(2005)。Designing the walkable city。Journal of Urban Planning and Development，131(4)，246-257。  new window
31.Sterman, J. D.(1994)。Learning in and about complex systems。System Dynamics Review，10(2/3)，291-323。  new window
32.Thurston, W. P.(1994)。On proof and progress in mathematics。Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society，30(2)，161-177。  new window
33.黃幹忠、葉光毅(20080300)。行人於臺中市一中商圈之路徑選擇行為模式探討。都市與計劃，35(1)，79-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.王思峰、黃家齊、陳加屏(20010700)。知識型社會中人力資源規劃之權變因素--實驗室實驗研究。管理評論，20(3)，53-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.李國偉(20000300)。證明的流變：一個數學哲學與數學史的綜合觀察。臺灣哲學研究，3，1-22。  延伸查詢new window
36.陳映均、林晏州(20140300)。都市街道景觀封閉感之研究。都市與計劃，41(1)，99-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.王思峰(19940900)。動態複雜案例之處方性實驗研究--管理學習實驗室、系統思考、績效與學習不對稱。中山管理評論，2(3)，93-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.翁興利、郭香蘭(20100600)。M-learning與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.黃家齊、王思峰(20080200)。團隊知識轉換能力組合與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效--知識螺旋理論的新觀點驗證。組織與管理，1(1)，39-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.王思峰、翁望回、鄭繼聖(20070300)。組織發展與策略管理的二重奏：策略形成歷程是什麼？。應用心理研究，33，127-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.屠益民(1996)。設計並檢驗「基模基礎的系統動力學建模過程」教材 (計畫編號：NSC85-2416-H110-013)。台北市：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.汪維揚(2001)。以系統動力學探討自組織團隊的認知機制(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林肇志(2010)。台灣舊都心再結構為宜居生活街區之指標評估系統研究(博士論文)。國立成功大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王思峰(1994)。管理學習實驗室之設計與學習遷移：動態性複雜案例之處方性實驗研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡雅泰(2006)。概念構圖融入國語教學對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、大意摘要能力與語文學習態度影響之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.詹秋貴(2000)。我國主要武器系統發展的政策探討(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王友龍(2012)。會圖解思考的人最厲害。台北市：臉譜出版：城邦文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.王承豪、O'Connor, J.、McDermott, I.(1999)。系統思考實用手冊。新北市：世茂出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陶在樸(1999)。系統動態學--直擊第五項修鍊奧秘。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.齊若蘭、Gore, A.(2013)。驅動大未來：牽動全球變遷的六個革命性巨變。台北市：天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Besson, L.、Carot, D.、Arthus-Bertrand, Y.(2009)。HOME：搶救地球。台北市：五泰影音出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Capra, F.(1994)。From the Parts to the Whole: Systems Thinking in Ecology and Education。CA：The Center for Ecoliteracy。  new window
7.Churchman, C. W.(1984)。The Systems Approach。NY：Dell Publishing。  new window
8.Coyle, R. G.(1996)。System Dynamics Modeling: A Practical Approach。NY：Chapman & Hall.。  new window
9.Finkle, S. L.、Torp, L. L.(1995)。Introductory Documents。IL：The Center for Problem-Based Learning, Illinois Math and Science Academy。  new window
10.Forrester, J. W.(1969)。Urban Dynamics。MA：Pegasus Communications。  new window
11.Jacobs, J.(1961)。The Death and Life of Great American Cities。NY：The Random House.。  new window
12.Morecroft, J. D. W.(2007)。Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach。London：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
13.Senge, P. M.、Cambron-McCabe, N.、Lucas, T.、Smith, B.、Dutton, J.(2012)。Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares about Education。NY：Bantam Dell Publishing Group。  new window
14.Senge, P. M.(1992)。The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization。Sydney：Random House。  new window
15.Senge, P. M.、Kliener, A.、Roberts, C.、Ross, R. B.、Smith, B.(1994)。The Fifth Discipline Field book: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization。NY：Bantam Dell Pub Group。  new window
16.Sterman, J. D.(2000)。Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World。MA：Irwin McGraw-Hill。  new window
17.漢寶德(2012)。築人間：漢寶德回憶錄。臺北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Meadows, Donella H.、Randers, Jorgen、Meadows, Dennis、高一中(2007)。成長的極限。臺北市：臉譜。  延伸查詢new window
19.謝長宏(1987)。系統動態學：理論、方法與應用。中興管理顧問。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Ventana Systems(2015)。Vensim PLE，MA：Ventana Systems Inc.。，http://vensim.com/free-download/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kunc, M.、Morecroft, J. D. W.(2007)。System dynamics modelling for strategic development。Supporting Strategy: Frameworks, Methods and Models。Chichester：Wiley。  new window
2.Roberts, E. B.(1978)。System dynamics--An introduction。Managerial Applications of System Dynamics。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：482（臺灣：478，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67511792
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上