臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：思考與推理適居環境建構之圖像因果實驗室
書刊名：造園景觀學報
作者：陳美智
作者(外文)：Chen, Mei-chih
出版日期：2016
卷期：21:2
頁次：頁73-98
主題關鍵詞：因果回饋環路；系統思考；適居環境；A causal loop diagram；System thinking；A compatible environment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:265
  • 點閱點閱:95
適居環境議題在都市發展過程總會受到持續關注與討論，都市需要提供多元功能與適宜的生活條件。但是，許多都市發展問題習慣被用直覺式決策來獲得快速解決；同時，卻產生許多不符合社會多元需求、長期使用等新問題。本文發現系統動態學方法論(System Dynamics, SD)的「因果回饋環路圖(Causal Loops Diagram, CLD)」，其圖像化模式可以聚焦問題、連結社會多元需求的邏輯思考與推理，據以建構「圖像因果實驗室」，做為引導適居環境系統思考的公共論壇輔助工具。實驗室必備的三階段論壇活動是：「直覺」，「因果推理」，及「CLD建模」。本文介紹SD「圖像因果實驗室」課程設計，並以適居環境議題分析在有或無實施「圖像因果實驗室」的系統思考訓練，在思考與推理成果的差異。
A compatible environment is always an issue that has been paid attention to and talked persistently in process of city development. Cities require pluralistic functions and compatible conditions of living. However, there're many problems of city development would be solved by the intuitional decision instantly, and the new problems that are not fit in with the pluralistic demands and long-term use to the community also appeared simultaneously. This study discovers that the graphic model of Causal Loops Diagram (CLD) of System Dynamics (SD) could help to focus problems and have a property of nexus on logistical thinking and reasoning the pluralistic demands of the community. Accordingly, this study makes a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ to be a public forum tool for leading system thinking on issue of a compatible environment. There're three required forum programs on thinking and reasoning in a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂, which are the earlier stage of a ＂intuition＂, the middle stage of a ＂causal reasoning＂, and the last stage of a ＂CLD modeling＂. This study introduces the plan for implementing forum programs of ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ on the SD course. This study also analyzes the different results of thinking and reasoning within forum programs that system thinking trains in a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ or none on issue of a compatible environment.
期刊論文
1.Morgan, G.(1983)。Rethinking Corporate Strategy: A Cybernetic Perspective。Human Relations，36(4)，345-360。  new window
2.黃幹忠、葉光毅(20080300)。行人於臺中市一中商圈之路徑選擇行為模式探討。都市與計劃，35(1)，79-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jan, C. G.(2003)。Policies for Developing Defense Technology in Newly Industrialized Countries: A Case Study of Taiwan。Technology in Society，25(3)，351-368。  new window
4.王思峰、黃家齊、陳加屏(20010700)。知識型社會中人力資源規劃之權變因素--實驗室實驗研究。管理評論，20(3)，53-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chen, J. H.、Jan, T. S.(2005)。A system dynamics model of the semiconductor industry development in Taiwan。Journal of the Operational Research Society，56(10)，1141-1150。  new window
6.王怡舜、湯宗益(20001100)。企業總體經濟環境決策支援之研究以系統動力學為建模方法。中華管理評論，3(4)，67-82。  延伸查詢new window
7.Forrester, J. W.、Senge, P. M.(1980)。Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models。TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences，14，209-228。  new window
8.屠益民、柯志昌、吳濟華、張鴻斌(20100900)。動態系統導向之高雄市水污染治理之研究。中山管理評論，18(3)，863-895。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Chan, S.-L.、Huang, S.-L.(2004)。A Systems Approach for the Development of a Sustainable Community: The Application of the Sensitivity Model (SM)。Journal of Environmental Management，72(3)，133-147。  new window
10.李國偉(20000300)。證明的流變：一個數學哲學與數學史的綜合觀察。臺灣哲學研究，3，1-22。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳映均、林晏州(20140300)。都市街道景觀封閉感之研究。都市與計劃，41(1)，99-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.吳瓊恩(19960300)。決策問題與決策者的思惟傾向。中國行政評論，5(2)，1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張象樞(2001)。關於可持續發展研究的系統思考。中國人口、資源與環境，11(2)，6-9。  延伸查詢new window
14.Cavaleri, S.、Sterman, J. D.(1997)。Towards evaluation of systems thinking interventions: a case study。System Dynamics Review，13(2)，171-186。  new window
15.Aramburo, S. A.、Acevedo, J. A. C.、Morales, Y. O.(2012)。Laboratory experiments in the system dynamics field。System Dynamics Review，28(1)，94-106。  new window
16.Anderson, J. R.(1993)。Problem solving and learning。American Psychologist，48(1)，39-41。  new window
17.Ackoff, R. L.(1994)。Systems thinking and thinking systems。System Dynamics Review，10(2/3)，175-188。  new window
18.Chen, M. C.、Chang, K.(2014)。Reasoning the Causality of City Sprawl, Traffic Congestion, and Green Land Disappearance in Taiwan Using the CLD Model。International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，11(11)，11464-11480。  new window
19.Cavana, R. Y.、Ford, A.(2004)。Environmental and Resource Systems: Editors' Introduction。System Dynamics Review，20，89-98。  new window
20.Coyle, G.、Exelby, D.(2000)。The Validation of Commercial System Dynamics Models。System Dynamics Review，16(1)，27-41。  new window
21.Guo, H. C.、Liu, L.、Huang, G. H.、Fuller, G. A.、Zou, R.、Yin, Y. Y.(2001)。A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: A study for the Lake Erhai Basin。Journal of Environmental Management，61(1)，93-111。  new window
22.Graham, A. K.、Senge, P. M.(1990)。Computer-based case study and learning laboratory projects。System Dynamics Review，6(1)，100-105。  new window
23.Kunc, M.(2008)。Using systems thinking to enhance strategy maps。Management Decision，46(5)，761-778。  new window
24.Kunc, M.(2012)。Teaching strategic thinking using system dynamics: lessons from a strategic development course。System Dynamics Review，28(1)，28-45。  new window
25.Khan, S.、Yufeng, L.、Ahmad, A.(2009)。Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach。Environmental Modelling & Software，24，1363-1372。  new window
26.Jan, T. S.、Jan, C. G.(2000)。Designing Simulation Software to Facilitate Learning of Quantities System Dynamics Skill: A Case Study in Taiwan。Journal of the Operational Research Society，51(4)，1409-1419。  new window
27.Meadows, D. H.、Robinson, J.(2002)。The Electronic Oracle: Computer Models and Social Decisions (excerpt)。System Dynamics Review，18(2)，271-308。  new window
28.Martinez-Moyano, I. J.、Richardson, G. P.(2013)。Best practices in system dynamics modeling。System Dynamics Review，29(2)，102-123。  new window
29.Maani, K. E.(2004)。Links between systems thinking and complex decision making。System Dynamics Review，20(1)，21-48。  new window
30.Lane, D. C.(1992)。Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams。European Journal of Operational Research，59(1)，64-84。  new window
31.Nuhoğlu, H.(2010)。The effect of the system dynamics approach on understanding causal relationship skills in science education。Procedia--Social and Behavioral Sciences，2，3614-3618。  new window
32.Milling, P. M.(2002)。Understanding and Managing Innovation Processes。System Dynamics Review，18(1)，73-86。  new window
33.Rosenthal, A. T.(2003)。Teaching systems thinking and practice through environmental art。ETHICS & THE ENVIRONMENT，8(1)，153-168。  new window
34.Richmond, B.(1994)。Systems Thinking/System Dynamics: Let's Just Get on with It。System Dynamics Review，10(2/3)，135-157。  new window
35.Qudrat-Ullah, H.(2010)。Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study。Computers & Education，55，1277-1286。  new window
36.Parayil, G.、Sreekumar, T. T.(2004)。Industrial Development and the Dynamics of Innovation in Hong Kong。International Journal of Technology Management，27(4)，369-392。  new window
37.Stave, K. A.(2002)。Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions。System Dynamics Review，18(2)，139-167。  new window
38.Southworth, M.(2005)。Designing the walkable city。Journal of Urban Planning and Development，131(4)，246-257。  new window
39.Wallen, Ruth(2012)。Ecological Art: A Call for Visionary Intervention in a Time of Crisis。Leonardo，45(3)，235-242。  new window
40.Veel, L.、Bredhauer, M.(2009)。'Living Local, Thinking Global': Creating and Sustaining Pedagogies。International Journal of Learning，16(9)，597-610。  new window
41.Thurston, W. P.(1994)。On Proof and Progress in Mathematics。Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society，30(2)，161-177。  new window
42.Sweeney, L. B.、Sterman, J. D.(2007)。Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems。System Dynamics Review，23(2/3)，285-312。  new window
43.王思峰(19940900)。動態複雜案例之處方性實驗研究--管理學習實驗室、系統思考、績效與學習不對稱。中山管理評論，2(3)，93-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.侯漢君(19980800)。系統動態的決策模式：以土地規劃為例。行政學報，29，151-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Doyle, J. K.、Ford, D. N.(1998)。Mental models concepts for system dynamics research。System Dynamics Review，14(1)，3-29。  new window
46.翁興利、郭香蘭(20100600)。M-learning與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.屠益民(1996)。設計並檢驗「基模基礎的系統動力學建模過程」教材 (計畫編號：NSC85-2416-H110-013)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林文川(2002)。創造力與創造性思考教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.汪維揚(2001)。以系統動力學探討自組織團隊的認知機制(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林肇志(2010)。台灣舊都心再結構為宜居生活街區之指標評估系統研究(博士論文)。國立成功大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王思峰(1994)。管理學習實驗室之設計與學習遷移：動態性複雜案例之處方性實驗研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡雅泰(2006)。概念構圖融入國語教學對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、大意摘要能力與語文學習態度影響之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.詹秋貴(2000)。我國主要武器系統發展的政策探討(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Morecroft, J. D. W.、Sterman, J.(1994)。Modeling for learning organizations。Productivity Press。  new window
2.齊柏林(2013)。我的心，我的眼，看見台灣。臺北：圓神出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jacobs, Jane(1961)。The Death and Life of Great American Cities。New York：Random House。  new window
4.唐妮菈．米道、斯喬詹．蘭德斯、丹尼斯．米道斯、高一中(2007)。成長的極限：三十週年。臺北市：臉譜。  延伸查詢new window
5.王友龍(2012)。會圖解思考的人最厲害。台北：臉譜/城邦文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.O'Connor, J.、McDermott, I.、王承豪(1999)。系統思考實用手冊。台北：世茂。  延伸查詢new window
7.齊柏林(2006)。從空中看台灣--齊柏林空中攝影集。台北：貓頭鷹出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.陶在樸(1999)。系統動態學--直擊第五項修鍊奧秘。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gore, A.、齊若蘭(2013)。驅動大未來：牽動全球變遷的六個革命性巨變。台北：天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Capra, F.(1994)。From the Parts to the Whole: Systems Thinking in Ecology and Education。Berkeley, CA：The Center for Ecoliteracy。  new window
11.Churchman, C. W.(1984)。The systems approach。New York：Dell Publishing。  new window
12.Forrester, J. W.(1973)。World Dynamics。Cambridge, MA：Wright-Allen Press。  new window
13.Meadows, Donella H.、Meadows, D. L.、Randers, J.(1992)。Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future。Post Mills, Vermont：Chelsea Green Publishing。  new window
14.Meadows, Donella H.、Meadows, Dennis L.、Randers, Jørgen、Behrens, William W. III(1972)。The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind。New York：Universe Books。  new window
15.Senge, P. M.、Cambron-McCabe, N.、Lucas, T.、Smith, B.、Dutton, J.(2012)。Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education。New York：Doubleday。  new window
16.Senge, P. M.(1992)。The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization。Sydney：Random House。  new window
17.Sterman, J. D.(2000)。Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world。Irwin McGraw-Hill。  new window
18.Senge, Peter M.、郭進隆、齊若蘭(2010)。第五項修練：學習型組織的藝術與實務。臺北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Coyle, R. G.(1996)。System Dynamics Modeling: A Practical Approach。New York：Chapman & Hall。  new window
20.Forrester, J. W.(1969)。Urban Dynamics。Waltham, MA：Pegasus Communications。  new window
21.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習：概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Forrester, Jay Wright(1961)。Industrial dynamics。M.I.T. Press。  new window
23.謝長宏(1987)。系統動態學：理論、方法與應用。中興管理顧問。  延伸查詢new window
24.Senge, Peter M.、Kleiner, Art、Roberts, Charlotte、Ross, Richard B.、Smith, Bryan J.(1994)。The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization。Doubleday。  new window
其他
1.公視新聞議題中心(2015)。焦點議題：我們的島--樹倒，http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/16/【我們的島】樹倒/。  延伸查詢new window
2.公視新聞議題中心(2015)。焦點議題：我們的島--濁水啟示，http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/17/【我們的島】濁水啟示/。  延伸查詢new window
3.公視新聞議題中心(2015)。頭條：溪洲部落40戶淹毀 史上最大颱風災害，http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/10/溪洲部落40戶淹毀-史上最大颱風災害/。  延伸查詢new window
4.台南市政府(2015)。台南市區域計畫（草案），台南。  延伸查詢new window
5.李鴻源(20150718)。台灣災害管理學：走過傷痛--台灣的災害管理，https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiA4V0KYVXU&feature=youtu.be。  延伸查詢new window
6.盧貝松(2009)。搶救地球，台北：五泰影音出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔣本基(2016)。人間百年筆陣：省思台南地震災害--加強防災減災教育，http://www.merit-times.com.tw/NewsPage.aspx?unid=430207。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Roberts, E. B.(1978)。[Managerial Applications of System Dynamics] An Introduction。Managerial Applications of System Dynamics。Williston, VT：Pegasus Communications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：463（臺灣：391，外國：72） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1068971 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66893198
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上