:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社區林業政策推動成效之研究:以宜蘭縣林美社區為例
書刊名:地理研究
作者:林鴻忠林浩立
作者(外文):Lin, Hong-chungLin, Hao-li
出版日期:2014
卷期:60
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:社區林業環境解說自然步道生態旅遊自然保育Community forestryEnvironmental interpretationNature trailEcotourismNature conservation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:31
林美社區2003年起參與社區林業迄今,透過人力培訓、資源調查、綠美化、環境解說規劃、自然步道及森林資源之認養管理,甚至生態旅遊之操作均有初步成果,經社區幹部深度訪談結果,在社會層面:社區已累積社造經驗,組織訂有章程,重視老人及學生福利,藉活動融入學校資源並傳承社區文化,以民主機制解決問題;在經濟層面:資源回收、解說服務、風味餐及金棗產品等是社區主要的經濟來源;在生態層面:社區86%之山林地帶,擁有豐富的生態資源,自然步道啟用後,啟發社區正確的保育觀念,並進行遊客宣導。依觀察紀錄與問卷調查,估計林美石磐步道遊客每年約有29萬餘人,男性略多於女性,來自北部地區之青壯年居多,以車程一日遊為主,平均每人在地方消費約1,500元,若依年遊客量,則林美社區帶給地方產值年約4億餘元;遊客對於景觀維護、解說設施、觀景平台及步道以生態工法使用自然材料之滿意度高;在生態旅遊認知上,遊客多數同意自然步道實施動態總量管制,且71%願付費,付費額度20元~30元,此顯示大多數遊客已重視自然保育及永續發展。
Since the year of 2003, Lin-Mei community has been involving in community forestry through manpower training, resource investigation, green landscaping, environmental interpretation planning, nature trails, the forest resource management, and even the operation of ecotourism. There are the preliminary results so far for all works above mention. Through in-depth interview on community leaders, on the societal level: Community has accumulated experience in community building, the organization has clear regulation, and pay attention to the welfare for the elderly and students. The community hold activities with the school resources nearby to inherit community culture, and they solve any problem by way of democratic institutions. On the economic level: the main source of community income are from resource recycling, interpretation service, style meals, and kumquat products, etc. On the ecological level: there are 86% of forest area in the community which have abundant ecological resources. When the nature trail were to start using, the concepts of correct conservation were inspired in community, and stared to make advocacy for visitors in the meanwhile. After observation records and a questionnaires survey, the outcome showed about 29 million tourists visiting the Nature trail in Lin-Mei community in a year. It also showed that men are slightly more than women, and mostly young adults from the northern region among the tourists. The consumption there averages 1,500 NT dollars per person for one day ride. If according to the amount of annual visitors, Lin-Mei community produces local value about 400 million. Tourists respond their high satisfaction in landscape maintenance, interpretation facilities, viewing platforms and trails with ecological engineering methods by using natural materials. With regard to the ecotourism cognition, most visitors agree to implementing dynamic total mass control for nature trail, and around 71% of them are willing to pay within 20 NT dollars to 30 NT dollars. This shows that most tourists have perceived the importance of nature conservation and sustainable development.
期刊論文
1.李俊鴻、王瓊霞、陳郁蕙、陳雅惠、陳凱俐(20130600)。臺灣社區林業生態產業間接效益之價值評估。應用經濟論叢,93,43-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳美惠、林晉戎(20060400)。臺灣社區林業計畫之執行內容與經營方向分析。臺灣林業,32(2),11-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.張世杰(20110800)。公共治理與地方創新:宜蘭縣社區林業計畫的推展經驗。空大行政學報,22,113-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.高晧翎、王鴻濬、蔣佩君、陳美惠(20110300)。影響居民參與社區林業因子之研究--以林美社區與湖本社區為例。中華林學季刊,44(1),87-102。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖學誠(2004)。民眾參與社區林業第--階段總體效益分析-以羅東林區管理處為例。林務局保育研究,92(6),4-7。  延伸查詢new window
6.盧道杰(2003)。他山之石可以攻錯-世界社區林業的發展概況。台灣林業,29(1),22-27。  延伸查詢new window
7.盧道杰、闕河嘉、黃書娟、林鴻忠、汪中仁(20110600)。社區培力與資源保育:我國社區林業政策評析。臺灣政治學刊,15(1),137-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.M.、Lovett, A.、O'Riordan, T.(2010)。Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal: moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development。Land Use Policy,27,1111-1122。  new window
9.Duinker, P.N.、Matakata, P.W.、Chege, F.、Bouthillier, L.(1994)。Community forestry in Canda: an overview。The Forestry Chronicle,70(6),711-714。  new window
10.Hajjar, R. F.、Kozak, R. A.、Innes, J. L.(2012)。Is decentralization leading to "real" decision-making power for forest-dependent communities? case studies from Mexico and Brazil。Ecology and Society,17(1),12。  new window
11.Kashwan, P.(2013)。The politics of rights-based approaches in conservation。Land Use Policy,31,613-626。  new window
12.Mallike, A. U.、Rahman, H.(1994)。Community forestry in developed and developing countries: a comparative study。The Forestry Chronicle,70(6),731-734。  new window
13.Şekercioglu, C. H.(2012)。Promoting community-based bird monitoring in the tropics: conservation, research, environmental education, capacity-building, and local incomes。Biological Conservation,151,69-73。  new window
14.Yaman, A. R.、Mohd A.(2004)。Community-based ecotourism: a new proposition for sustainable development and environmental conservation in Malaysia。Journal of Applied Sciences,4,583-589。  new window
15.鐘龍治、廖學誠、陳宛君、劉瓊蓮、陳美惠(20050900)。羅東林區民眾參與社區林業計畫之評估與分析。地理學報,41,83-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hamdi, N.、Goethert, R.(1997)。Action planning for cities: A guide to community practice。John Wiley and Sons L。  new window
2.Masse, S.(1995)。Community forestry: Concept, aplications and issues, Quebcc。Canada:Laurention forestry centre。  new window
3.Forestry Bureau(2002)。社區林業--居民參與保育共生計畫補助須知。臺北:林務局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE