:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣新士林哲學的美學轉向
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:劉千美
作者(外文):Liu, Johanna
出版日期:2015
卷期:42:7=494
頁次:頁75-90
主題關鍵詞:生命哲學美學藝術中的醜詩性創作羅光趙雅博李震Aesthetics of life philosophyUgliness in artsLo KuangChao Ya-PoLi Chen
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:49
本文探討新士林哲學美學思想在臺灣的研究與發展。一方面論述20世紀以來天主教學者,從不同的面向鋪陳多瑪斯思想傳統中關於藝術與美學的現代或後現代議題,在臺灣學界的閱讀與研究。另方面從當代美學觀點,論述以羅光、趙雅博、李震等為代表的臺灣天主教哲學家,關於藝術與美學議題的討論與出版。本文將指出臺灣新士林哲學的美學研究,在強調實證與科學而輕忽藝術與美學研究價值的臺灣哲學界,所具有的獨特意義與貢獻。在體系建構之外,有關詩性創作、圖像、藝術美醜、生命哲學美學問題的討論,更涉及當代思維的美學轉向。
This article aims to scrutinize the aesthetic questions in the research context of Neo-Scholastic philosophy in Taiwan. On the one hand, it will investigate Taiwan scholars' understanding and researches about how Catholic scholars have explicated through different approaches the modern or post-modern issues about the arts and aesthetics in the Thomist philosophical tradition ever since the twentieth century. On the other hand, it will state the discussions and publications by the Catholic scholars in Taiwan on the topic s of arts and aesthetics in contemporary culture, with Lo Kuang, CHAO Va-Po and LI Chen as the representatives. It will point out that the study of the aesthetics in Taiwan Neo-Scholasticism is unique in its meaning and contribution as the philosophical circle in Taiwan has always been oriented toward positivism and science rather than art s and aesthetics. Besides, the discussion s on poetic creation, the aesthetic problems of images, the beauty and ugliness of arts and the aesthetic issues of life philosophy in Taiwan Neo-Scholasticism refer to the aesthetic turn in contemporary philosophy.
圖書
1.Eco, Umberto、McEwen, Alastair(2007)。On Ugliness。Rizzoli。  new window
2.尤煌傑(2011)。美學基本原理:士林哲學的美學理論建構。臺北:哲學與文化月刊社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.趙雅博(2006)。談美:從自然美到藝術美。輔仁大學士林哲學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.何佳瑞(2009)。馬里旦美學中的美與善。臺北:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Nancy, Jean-Luc(2003)。Au fond des images。Paris:Galilée。  new window
6.Eco, Umberto、彭淮棟(2008)。醜的歷史。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.李震(1983)。杜斯妥也夫斯基的精神世界。新北:輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.於斌(1965)。三知論。臺北:自由太平洋文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Rancière, Jacques、黃建宏(2011)。影像的宿命。臺北:典藏。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bergon, Henri(1961)。Le Rire: essai sur la signification du comique。Paris:Presses universitaires de France。  new window
11.Martin, Jacque(1920)。Art et scholastique。Paris:La librariede l’Art Catholique。  new window
12.Tolstoy, Leo(1904)。What Is Art?。New York:Funk & Wagnalls。  new window
13.李震(2001)。永恆的追尋--抱無詩集。台北:魔豆文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.羅光(1981)。士林哲學--實踐篇。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.羅光(1999)。生命哲學的美學。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.Beardsley, Monroe C.(1966)。Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present--A Short History。Macmillan。  new window
17.Rancière, Jacques(2003)。Le Destin des images。La fabrique éditions。  new window
圖書論文
1.Derrida, Jaques、Spivak, G. C.(1992)。...That Dangerous Supplement...。Acts of Literature。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Kosuth, Joseph(1991)。Art after Philosophy。Art After Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966-1990。Cambridge。  new window
3.Barthes, Roland(1977)。Rhetoric of the Image。Image-Music-Text。New York:Hill and Wang。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE