:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:考量社會互動下之機慢車停車地點選擇行為模式之建構
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:謝旭昇夏晧清葉光毅 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Hsu-shengHsia, Hao-chingYeh, Kuang-yih
出版日期:2015
卷期:42:3
頁次:頁325-362
主題關鍵詞:機慢車路邊停車社會互動停車地點選擇行為Motorcycle and bicycleOn-street parkingSocial interactionParking location choice behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:121
在許多的交通現象中,個體的行為可能會受到「社會互動」的影響;然而,回顧過去做為政策評估基礎的交通行為模式,多半視個體行為係獨立於他人行為的脈絡,此將使得社會互動存在下的交通政策評估產生偏誤。有鑑於此,本研究選定了在台灣各市中心造成嚴重問題的「機慢車路邊停車行為」進行考察,以台南市中心街區做為實證地區,對機慢車使用者實施敘述性偏好問卷的面對面訪問調查,透過系統隨機抽樣的方式,共獲取了192個有效樣本。本研究立足於「互動模式」理論,利用蒐集的實證資料來建構「導入社會互動效果的停車地點選擇行為模式」,此模式的特點在於,其能彈性地處理內生性的識別問題,並可整合傳統的離散選擇模式。模式校估結果顯示,「團體平均選擇水準」會對個體的決策行為產生顯著的正向影響,其代表了機慢車使用者於「停車地點選擇行為」上有著遵從他人行為的傾向,而支持了於該行為中社會互動的存在。另外,於模式校估結果的基礎上,所進行之「考量社會互動下的政策變數效果分析」中顯示:若依一般的效果評估方式,當減少1%的「停車場至目的地之距離」時,選擇「路外停車」的「機率變動百分比」為0.81%,但在納入了「社會互動的連鎖效果」後,「機率變動百分比」則增為3.38%;當減少1%的「使用停車場之固定費用」時,若依一般的效果評估方式,選擇「路外停車」的「機率變動百分比」為1.76%,而在納入「社會互動的連鎖效果」後則增為7.33%。此結果意味著,在針對可能存在社會互動的交通行為進行分析時,若未將社會互動納入考量,則易使相關政策的評估產生偏誤。
The effect of social interaction on individual behavior possibly exists in many types of travel phenomenon. However, the previous travel behavior models, used to be bases for policy evaluation, assume that individual behavior is independent of others, and therefore lead to the bias in the evaluation of transportation policies under the circumstance that social interaction exists. In view of this, this study examines the on-street motorcycle and bicycle parking behavior which has resulted in a severe negative effect in the city centers of Taiwan. The city centre of Tainan City is designated as the study area. The stated preference questionnaire survey aimed at the motorcycle and bicycle users is conducted by face-to-face interview. 192 samples are acquired through the systematic sampling with a random start. Subsequently, the parking location choice behavior model incorporating social interaction effect is constructed based on the theory of interaction-based model which is capable of resolving the endogeneity problem flexibly and integrating traditional discrete choice model. The estimation result shows average choice level of group has the significant positive effect on decision of individual. This result represents that motorcycle and bicycle users tend to conform to the others' behavior in terms of parking location choice. It is recognized that social interaction among users' behavior exists. The policy analysis is also employed. First, according to the method of general effect evaluation, which is often employed in previous studies, the percentage change of the probability of individual choosing off-street parking would be 0.81% given the distance (from the parking lot to the destination) decreases 1%, whereas given the same circumstance, the percentage change of the probability would be 3.38% according to the proposed method incorporating the chain effect of social interaction. Secondly, according to the method of general effect evaluation, the percentage change of the probability of individual choosing off-street parking would be 1.76% given the fixed cost (of using the parking lot) decreases 1%, whereas given the same circumstance, the percentage change of the probability would be 7.33% according to the proposed method. The results imply that the biases exist in the evaluation of related policies if the social interaction effect is not considered in the analysis on the travel behavior which is influenced by the social interaction.
期刊論文
1.Cabral, L. M. B.(1990)。On the Adoption of Innovations with 'Network' Externalities。Mathematical Social Sciences,19(3),299-308。  new window
2.Manski, Charles F.(2000)。Economic analysis of social interactions。Journal of Economic Perspectives,14(3),115-136。  new window
3.Leibenstein, Harvey(1950)。Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand。Quarterly Journal of Economics,64(2),183-207。  new window
4.內田武史、細見昭、黑川洸(2002)。違法駐輪に関する意識を考慮した自転車利用者の駐輪場所選択行動特性分析。土木計画学研究.論文集,19(2),409-414。  延伸查詢new window
5.佐々木邦明、西井和夫、土屋勇太(2003)。パークアンドバスライド利用意向がマクロの利用率から受ける影響に関する研究。土木計画學研究・論文集,20(4),835-841。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳玉鋒、吳中宇(2011)。村域社会資本、互动与新农保参保行为研究互动与新农保参保行为研究。人口与经济,2,62-68。  延伸查詢new window
7.姜渝生、王福裕(19980100)。停車區位選擇與停車延時之混合需求模式之研究。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences,8(1),68-83。  延伸查詢new window
8.夏晧清、葉光毅、傅裕豪、謝旭昇(20110900)。將社會行為理論導入於公共工程計畫的應用--從「態度追隨型計畫」到「態度轉變型計畫」。建築與規劃學報,12(2),161-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.森川高行、田中小百合、荻野成康(1997)。社会的相互作用を取り入れた個人選択 モデル--自動車利用自粛行動への適用。土木学会論文集,569,53-63。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉光毅、吳永隆(19981200)。交通行為方法論的回顧與展望(2)--理論發展方向之建議。長榮學報,2(2),85-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.福田大輔、上野博義、森地茂(2004)。社会的相互作用存在下での交通行動とミクロ 計量分析。土木学会論文集,765,49-64。  延伸查詢new window
12.藤井聡(2002)。社会的ジレンマにおける他者協力率•誤認矯正方略。土木学会第57回年次学術講演会論文集,447,893-894。  延伸查詢new window
13.藤井聡、小李篤史、北村隆一(2002)。自転車放置者への説得的コミュニケーショ ン:社会的ジレンマ解消のための心理的方略。土木計画学研究•論文集,19(1),439-446。  延伸查詢new window
14.Dawes, Robyn M.、Messick, David M.(2000)。Social dilemmas。International Journal of Psychology,35(2),111-116。  new window
15.Dugundji, E. R.、Paez, A.、Arentze, T. A.、Walker, J. L.、Carrasco, J. A.、Marchal, F.、Nakanishi, H.(2011)。Transportation and social interactions。Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice,45(4),239-247。  new window
16.Durlauf, S. N.(1993)。Nonergodic economic growth。Review of Economic Studies,60(2),349-366。  new window
17.Durlauf, S. N.(2001)。Rejoinder: Discussions of a framework for the study of individual behavior and social interactions。Sociological Methodology,31(1),123-128。  new window
18.Grissom, M. D.、Belegundu, A. D.、Rangaswamy, A.、Koopmann, G. H.(2006)。Conjoint analysis based multiattribute optimization: Application in acoustical design。Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,31(1),8-16。  new window
19.Kameda, T.、Nakanishi, D.(2002)。Cost-benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment: An evolutionary simulation and an experiment with human subjects。Evolution and Human Behavior,23(5),373-393。  new window
20.Kawaguchi, Daiji(2004)。Peer effects on substance use among American teenagers。Journal of Population Economics,17(2),351-367。  new window
21.Topa, G.(2001)。Social interactions, local spillovers, and unemployment。Review of Economic Studies,68(2),261-295。  new window
22.張新立、葉祖宏(19950300)。以陳述性偏好法探討停車需求行為。運輸計劃,24(1),39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Fujii, S.、Jakobsson, C.、Garling, T.(2000)。Determinants of Private Car Users' Acceptance of Road Pricing。Transport Policy,7(2),135-158。  new window
24.Manski, Charles F.(1993)。Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem。Review of Economic Studies,60(3),531-542。  new window
25.Simon, H. A.(1990)。Invariants of human behavior。Annual Review of Psychology,41(1),1-19。  new window
26.Granovetter, Mark(1978)。Threshold models of collective behavior。American Journal of Sociology,83(6),1420-1443。  new window
27.Schwartz, S. H.(1977)。Normative influences on altruism。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,10,221-279。  new window
28.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,10(4),622-647。  new window
29.Dawes, R. M.(1980)。Social Dilemmas。Annual Review of Psychology,31(1),169-193。  new window
30.湯沢昭、瀧上幸治(2003)。中心市街地における迷惑駐輪の現狀と駐輪對策に關する檢討。交通工学,38(6),42-52。  延伸查詢new window
31.Brock, W.、Durlauf, S.(2001)。Discrete choice with social interactions。Review of Economic Studies,68(2),235-260。  new window
32.Fukuda, D.、Morichi, S.(2007)。Incorporating aggregate behavior in an individual's discrete choice: An application to analyzing illegal bicycle parking behavior。Transportation Research Part A,41(4),313-325。  new window
會議論文
1.Hsieh, H. S.、Hsia, H. C.、Yeh, K. Y.(2011)。An analysis of policy intervention to on-street scooter and bicycle parking considering the social interaction effect。The 6th International Conference on Planning and Design。Tainan。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭賜榮、張勝雄、蔡輝昇、李治綱、呂懿慧、蕭建華(1988)。都市地區機車管制策略之研究。交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林彗珊(2008)。同儕關係對國中生抽菸、喝酒行為之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳宗慶(2008)。基隆火車站周邊機車停車改善之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃建樺(2005)。機車實施路邊停車收費對民眾旅運行為之影響--以台北市西門町商業中心區為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
4.福田大輔(2004)。社会的相互作用が交通行動に及ぼす影響のミクロ計量分析(博士論文)。東京大学。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝旭昇(2013)。導入社會互動效果的停車地點選擇行爲模式之建構與集體行爲門檻 分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。  延伸查詢new window
6.藺培志(1997)。機車停車管理對機車使用者停車行為影響之研究--以台北巿西門町與南陽街為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
7.傅裕豪(2011)。應用心理策略削減機慢車違規停放之研究:以說服與溝通解決社會困境問題(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.藍嘉俊(2001)。失落的人性空間--台北市人行空間問題的政治經濟學分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.(2009)。Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach。South-Western Cengage Learning。  new window
2.黃芳銘(2009)。結構方程模式--理論與應用。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.山岸俊男(2002)。心でっかちな日本人--集団主義文化という幻想。日本経済新聞社。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳玉印(1970)。直交表與點線圖。台北:中國生產力中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.林豐福、葉祖宏(1999)。台灣地區機車交通管理政策之研究。交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.凌瑞賢(2008)。運輸規劃原理與實務。台北:鼎漢。  延伸查詢new window
7.張新立、吳宗修、吳舜丞、楊政樺、陳鴻文、楊筑雅、郭承瑋、黃月貞、楊家銘、林國顯、湯儒彥、張瓊文(2002)。我國機車持有及使用特性之研究。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳彥仲(1991)。Fortran程式碼。Evanston:Northwestern University。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉光毅、紀雲曜、夏晧清(2008)。都市計畫學際議題論叢。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Aronson, E.、Wilson, T. D.、Akert, R. M.(2010)。Social Psychology。Prentice Hall。  new window
11.Blanck, P. D.(1993)。Interpersonal Expectations: Theory, Research, and Applications。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Cooper, R. W.(1999)。Coordination Games: Complementarities and Macroeconomics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Crisp, R. J.、Turner, R. N.(2007)。Essential Social Psychology。London:Sage Publications。  new window
14.Delamater, J. D.、Myers, D. J.(2006)。Social Psychology。Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
15.Manski, C. F.(2007)。Identification Problems in the Social Sciences。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
16.Maruyama, G. M.(1997)。Basic of Structural Equation Modeling。London:Sage。  new window
17.Murray, M. P.(2006)。Econometrics: A modern introduction。Boston:Pearson Addison Wesley。  new window
18.Schelling, Thomas C.(2006)。Micromotives and Macrobehavior。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
19.葉光毅、吳永隆(1998)。地區性交通計畫。臺中市:滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.Ben-Akiva, Moshe E.、Lerman, Steven R.(1985)。Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
21.施鴻志、段良雄、凌瑞賢(1984)。都市交通計畫:理論.實務。臺北:茂昌。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of social Theory。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
23.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings。Prentice Hall International。  new window
24.黃台心(2004)。計量經濟學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.藤井聡(2003)。社会的ジレンマの処方箋--都市.交通.環境問題のための心理学。京都:ナカニシヤ。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.交通部統計處(2012)。臺閩地區機動車輛登記數,http://www.motc.gov.tw/uploaddowndoc?file=view/2011/, 2012/02/16。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Moffitt, R. A.(2001)。Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions。Social Dynamics。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
2.Asch, Solomon E.(1951)。Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments。Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations。Carnegie Press。  new window
3.Ajzen, Icek(1985)。From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior。Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior。Springer-Verlag。  new window
4.Brock, William A.、Durlauf, Steven N.(2001)。Interactions-based Models。Handbook of Econometrics。Amsterdam:Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE