:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際法對於戰時中立及永久中立國之規範
書刊名:臺灣國際研究季刊
作者:廖福特 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Fort Fu-te
出版日期:2015
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁23-45
主題關鍵詞:國際人道法永久中立國海牙公約日內瓦公約International humanitarian lawPermanently neutral stateHague ConventionsGeneva Conventions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:129
『聯合國憲章』採用不使用武力原則,僅允許自我防衛。在無法完全消弭戰爭的情況下,國際社會長久以來致力於兩件事,一者是限制在戰爭中使用某些武器及作戰方法,即國際人道法所稱之海牙體系。另一者是努力使武裝衝突人道化,即日內瓦體系。兩者均規範中立國之地位及作為。國際法沒有直接的國際條約規定永久中立國之權利及義務。由學理及國家實踐觀之,永久中立國之核心原則包括放棄發起戰爭之權利、不參與交戰國之戰爭、禁止交戰國因為軍事目的而使用其領土、不允許外國在其國內設立軍事基地、不參與軍事同盟、有義務維持中立、平等對待交戰國。參與國際組織不會影響其永久中立地位,永久中立國只要不是直接參與軍事行動,不違反其永久中立地位。而達成永久中立之方式有不同類型,可能是單方行為、雙邊條約或是多邊條約。亦有單方宣示永久中立,再得到聯合國大會確認者。對於臺灣而言,本文認為,首先如果選擇戰時中立的話,應該遵守『海牙第五公約』及『海牙第三公約』與四個『日內瓦公約』及其議定書。其次,有關是否成為永久中立國,應該採用武裝中立,以公民投票之方式表達表達臺灣人民之集體意志。
The UN Charter adopts non-force principle allowing only self-defense. While war cannot be abolished, the international community has been working on two issues. One is to limit weapon and warfare and to establish Hague system of international humanitarian law. The other is to humane conflicts and to establish Geneva system. Both systems offer rules for neutral states. The international law does not have direct treaty rules of rights and obligations of permanently neutral states. According to scholar views and state practices, core principles of permanently neutral state include abandoning right to initiating war, not participating in war, not to provide military base, equal treat of belligerents. Joining intergovernmental organizations will not affect its status of permanently neutral. A permanently neutral state will maintain its status as long as it does not directly participate into military action. Permanently neutral status can be obtained by unilateral act, bilateral or multilateral treaty. This paper also argues that if Taiwan chooses to be neutral during wars, it has to comply with Hague Conventions No. 5 and No. 13 and four Geneva Conventions and their Protocols. Moreover, if Taiwan wishes to be a permanently neutral state, it can hold a referendum to obtain armed neutrality.
期刊論文
1.Zecha, Wolfgang(2011)。Neutrality and International Solidarity: A Comparison of the Policy of Certain European Countries with Respect to the UN。AARMS: Academic and Applied Research in Military Science,10(2),305-326。  new window
2.李俊毅(20140300)。政治社群、認同與外交政策:「芬蘭化」概念的再思考。問題與研究,53(1),35-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.廖福特(20030500)。非理性戰爭行為之理性人道規範--四個日內瓦公約及兩個議定書。全國律師,7(5),5-15。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡明螢(20040700)。瑞士中立政策轉變之研究--以瑞士加入聯合國為例。國際論壇,3,107-141。  延伸查詢new window
5.Havel, Brian F.(2000)。An International Law Institution in Crisis: Rethinking Permanent Neutrality。Ohio State Law Journal,51,167-266。  new window
6.Schindler, Dietrich(1998)。Neutrality and Morality: Developments in Switzerland and in the International Community。American University International Law Review,14,155-171。  new window
7.Subedi, Surya P.(1993)。Neutrality in a Changing World: European Neutral States and the European Community。International and Comparative Law Quarterly,42(2),238-268。  new window
8.蕭琇安(20080300)。轉變國際秩序下「中立」概念之地位。問題與研究,47(1),29-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.中華民國紅十字總會(2008)。國際人道法參考資料。國際人道法:當代的議題與挑戰研討會。臺北:中華民國紅十字總會。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國紅十字總會(2015)。紀念日內瓦公約150週年研討會紀念冊。紀念日內瓦公約150週年研討會。臺北:中華民國紅十字總會。  延伸查詢new window
3.李怡俐(2015)。國際司法機制對於國際人道法的貢獻。紀念日內瓦公約150週年研討會。臺北:中華民國紅十字總會。52-62。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kadam, Umesh(2008)。國際人道法在當代世界之重要性。國際人道法:當代的議題與挑戰研討會。臺北:中華民國紅十字總會。18-23。  延伸查詢new window
5.趙國材(2015)。國際人道法之演進、實踐與發展。紀念日內瓦公約150週年研討會。臺北:中華民國紅十字總會。40-51。  延伸查詢new window
6.General Assembly(19951112)。Permanent Neutrality of Turkmenistan。A/RES/50/80 A, 90th plenary meeting。  new window
學位論文
1.童振源(1994)。國際人道法之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.于耀東、王文(2010)。國際法。廈門:廈門大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.余寬賜(1994)。新世紀國際法。臺北:余寬賜。  延伸查詢new window
3.張俊宏(2011)。和平中立的臺灣。臺北:臺灣書房。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝瑞智(2012)。翹翹板上的臺灣--建立和平中立的大同世界。謝瑞智。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇義雄(2007)。平時國際法。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Carter, Barry E.、Weiner, Allen S.(2011)。International Law。New York:Wolters Kluwer。  new window
7.Detter, Ingrid(2013)。The Law of War。Surrey:Ashgate。  new window
8.Klabbers, Jan(2013)。International Law。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Novaković, Igor S.(2013)。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
10.Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf、吳越、毛曉飛(2006)。當代西方國際法德國的觀點。臺北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
11.Shaw, Malcolm N.(2008)。International Law。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Tucker, Robert W.(2006)。The Law of War and Neutrality At Sea。New York:Law Book Exchange。  new window
13.王鐵崖、王人傑(1992)。國際法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.俞寬賜(2002)。從國際人權法、國際人道法及國際刑法研究個人的國際法地位問題。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland(2012)。ABC Switzerland and UN,https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/eda/en/documents/topics/03-Druckdaten_ABC_UNO_english.pdf, 2015/04/13。  new window
2.Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland(2014)。UN Policy of Switzerland,https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/eda/en/documents/topics/20140814-UNO-Politik-der-Schweiz_EN.pdf, 2015/04/13。  new window
3.Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland(2015)。International Cooperation on Security Matters,https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/fdfa/foreign-policy/securitypolicy/security-international.html, 2015/04/10。  new window
4.International Committee of the Red Cross(2002)。International Humanitarian Law: Answers to Your Questions,https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0703.pdf, 2015/04/10。  new window
5.International Committee of the Red Cross。Treaties and State Parties to such Treaties,https://www.icrc.org/ihl, 2015/09/16。  new window
6.OSCE(2014)。What Is the OSCE,http://www.osce.org/secretariat/35775?Download=true, 2015/04/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.趙國材(1997)。論永久中立國與聯合國。聯合國與歐美國家論文集。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bring, Ove(2013)。The Concept of Neutrality: Origins and Challenges。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
3.Fischer, Thomas(2013)。European Neutrals in the Cold War。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
4.Frischenschlager, Friedhelm(2013)。Austria's 'Permanent Neutrality' after 1955: A Model for Serbia?。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
5.Nielsen, Mette Kjuel(2013)。Western View of Neutrality。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
6.Westberg, Jacob(2013)。Sweden's Policy of Neutrality。Neutrality in the 21st Century for Serbia。Belgrade:ISAC Fond。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE