臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從行政院研究發展考核委員會檢視我國績效體系的形成與發展
書刊名：文官制度
作者：蘇偉業／楊和縉
作者(外文)：So, Bennis Wai Yip／Yang, Ho-chin
出版日期：2015
卷期：7:4
頁次：頁1-38
主題關鍵詞：績效體系；績效衡量；績效干預；行政院研究發展考核委員會；Performance regime；Performance measurement；Performance intervention；The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:112
  • 點閱點閱:159
本文以行政院研究發展考核委員會（以下簡稱研考會）為中心，分析我國績效體系（performance regime）的形成及發展。本文利用Colin Talbot提出的績效體系框架作為切入角度，回顧分析我國如何透過研考會來建立引導績效行為的制度系絡及干預工具。
本文指出我國政府績效體系是奠基於國民政府大陸時期蔣中正提出的「行政三聯制」架構，且在大陸統治期間進行了初步的試驗，最終在臺灣生根發展，並由研考會之成立衍生我國由研考體制為代號的績效管理系統。而研考會也為我國推展了一系列的績效干預工具。與西方國家相比，我國的績效體系發展有著自身獨特的脈絡，也發展出自己特殊的績效干預工具─管制考核。同時，我國一直引進大量西方的管理工具，彌補自身績效管理技術不足之問題。
透過回顧我國的績效體系，本文會以更為宏觀的角度理解我國政府績效運動，帶出了一個超越組織績效衡量作為分析單位之新視野，為未來有效解釋組織績效行為建立更為完整的框架。
This paper analyzes the formation and development of performance regime of Taiwan by zeroing in on the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), Executive Yuan. Making use of the performance regime framework offered by Colin Talbot, this paper explores how Taiwan established institutional context and performance intervention for steering performance behavior.
This paper indicates that the foundation of performance regime of the Taiwan government was laid by the “administrative trinity system” framework initiated by Chiang Kai-shek. The framework was experimented in the Nationalist rule in Mainland China and it was ultimately rooted in Taiwan. The establishment of the RDEC developed a performance management system in the name of “research & evaluation mechanism” The RDEC also promoted an array of tools for performance intervention. Compared with Western countries, the performance regime in Taiwan has its own unique context and has developed its own particular tool for performance intervention performance intervention performance intervention Through this review, this paper will interpret the performance movement in Taiwan from a macro perspective and introduce a better analysis unit beyond the organizational performance measurement. This would help establish a complete framework for accounting for the organizational performance behavior.
期刊論文
1.Hatry, H. P.(1980)。Performance Measurement Principles and Techniques: An Overview for Local Government。Public Productivity Review，4(2)，312-339。  new window
2.Halachmi, Arie(2002)。Performance Measurement, Accountability, and Improved Performance。Public Performance & Management Review，25(4)，370-374。  new window
3.Grizzle, Gloria A.(2002)。Performance Measurement and Dysfunction: The Dark Side of Quantifying Work。Public Performance & Management Review，25(4)，363-369。  new window
4.何沙崙(19971200)。全面品質管理與為民服務。研考雙月刊，21(6)=202，3-9。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hatry, Harry P.(2002)。Performance Measurement: Fashions and Fallacies。Public Performance & Management Review，25(4)，352-358。  new window
6.Halachmi,A.(2005)。Performance Measurement:Test the Water before You Dive in。International Review of Administrative Sciences，71(2)，255-266。  new window
7.胡龍騰(20110600)。我國施政績效資訊運用實務與問題分析。研考雙月刊，35(3)=283，10-22。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hood, Christopher(2006)。Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services。Public Administration Review，66(4)，515-521。  new window
9.Moynihan, D. P.、Lavertu, S.(2012)。Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART。Public Administration Review，72(4)，592-602。  new window
10.Moynihan, Donald P.、Pandey, Sanjay K.(2010)。The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，20(4)，849-866。  new window
11.Moynihan, Donald P.(2005)。Goal-based learning and the future of performance management。Public Administration Review，65(2)，203-216。  new window
12.古步鋼、林芳如(20121200)。管制考核業務之展望。研考雙月刊，36(6)=292，166-172。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳秀貞、莊靜雯、秦正宇(20121200)。政府施政績效管理推動現況與成果。研考雙月刊，36(6)=292，42-49。  延伸查詢new window
14.Van Ryzin, G. G.(2007)。Pieces of a puzzle: linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust。Public Performance & Management Review，30(4)，521-535。  new window
15.Van Ryzin, G. G.(2008)。Citizen perceptions of road smoothness: evidence from New York with implications for comparative performance measurement。International Review of Administrative Sciences，74(4)，575-588。  new window
16.So, Bennis Wai Yip(2012)。Learning as a key to citizen-centred performance improvement: a comparison between the health service centre and the household registration office in Taipei City。The Australian Journal of Public Administration，71(2)，201-210。  new window
17.Talbot, C.(2008)。Performance regimes-context of performance policies。International Journal of Public Administration，31，1569-1591。  new window
18.Jung, C. S.(2011)。Organizational goal ambiguity and performance: conceptualization, measurement, and relationships。International Public Management Journal，14(2)，193-217。  new window
19.Chan, H. S.、Gao, J.(2013)。Can the same key open different locks? administrative values underlying performance measurement in China。Public Administration，91(2)，366-380。  new window
20.Bouckaert, G.、Balk, W.(1991)。Public productivity measurement: diseases and cures。Public Productivity & Management Review，15(2)，229-235。  new window
21.Bouckaert, G.、Peters, B. G.(2002)。Performance measurement and management: the Achilles' heel in administration modernization。Public Performance and Management Review，25(4)，359-362。  new window
22.Aktan, C. C.(1995)。An introduction to the theory of privatization。The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies，20(2)，187-217。  new window
23.朱景鵬、朱鎮明(20140900)。績效治理：趨勢、內涵與挑戰。公共治理季刊，2(3)，29-41。  延伸查詢new window
24.江明修、汪明生、黃榮護(19980100)。我國行政革新之政治社會分析：歷史的再省思。公共行政學報．政大，2，55-93+95-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Williams, Daniel W.(2003)。Measuring government in the early twentieth century。Public Administration Review，63(6)，643-659。  new window
26.Talbot, C.(2000)。Performing 'performance' --a comedy in five acts。Public Money & Management，20(4)，63-68。  new window
27.Holzer, M.、Yang, K.(2004)。Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of the art。International Review of Administrative Sciences，70(1)，15-31。  new window
28.Drucker, Peter F.(1980)。The Deadly Sins in Public Administration。Public Administration Review，40(2)，103-106。  new window
29.Dubnick, Melvin J.(2005)。Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms。Public Performance & Management Review，28(3)，376-417。  new window
30.Bevan, G.、Hood, C.(2006)。What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system。Public Administration，84(3)，517-538。  new window
31.郭昱瑩(20090400)。政府績效管理與執行力建構。研考雙月刊，33(2)=270，30-47。  延伸查詢new window
32.張四明(20091000)。行政院施政績效評估制度之運作經驗與改革方向。研考雙月刊，33(5)=273，45-58。  延伸查詢new window
33.高孔廉(1999)。十年研考情。研考雙月刊，23(1)，116-118。  延伸查詢new window
34.魏鏞(1999)。在學術、政策與政治之間：從事研考工作十二年的回顧、感想與展望。研考雙月刊，23(1)，97-101。  延伸查詢new window
35.魏鏞(1987)。推動為民服務工作應有的基本觀念與努力重點。研考月刊，11(6)，3-9。  延伸查詢new window
36.胡龍騰(200706)。公民引領之政府績效管理：初探性模式建構。行政暨政策學報，44，79-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Aucoin, Peter、Heintzman, Ralph(2000)。The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform。International Review of Administrative Sciences，66(1)，45-55。  new window
38.Smith, Peter(1995)。On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector。International Journal of Public Administration，18(2/3)，277-310。  new window
39.蘇偉業(20090300)。公共部門事前定向績效管理：反思與回應。公共行政學報，30，105-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.張四明(20100600)。政府施政績效評估制度之實證分析。研考雙月刊，34(3)=277，12-23。  延伸查詢new window
41.Swindell, David、Kelly, Janet M.(2000)。Linking Citizen Satisfaction Data to Performance Measures: A Preliminary Evaluation。Public Performance and Management Review，24(1)，30-52。  new window
42.Van Thiel, Sandra、Leeuw, Frans L.(2002)。The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector。Public Performance & Management Review，25(3)，267-281。  new window
43.范祥偉、王崇斌(20001200)。政府績效管理：分析架構與實務策略。中國行政評論，10(1)，155-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Behn, Robert D.(2003)。Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures。Public Administration Review，63(5)，586-606。  new window
45.Sanderson, I.(2001)。Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government。Public Administration，79(2)，297-313。  new window
46.Berman, Evan(2002)。How Useful is Performance Measurement。Public Performance & Management Review，25(4)，348-351。  new window
47.陳敦源(20021200)。績效制度設計的資訊問題：訊號、機制設計與代理成本。行政暨政策學報，35，45-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.劉維開(20040500)。國防最高委員會的組織與運作。國立政治大學歷史學報，21，135-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.Wilson, Woodrow(1887)。The Study of Administration。Political Science Quarterly，2(2)，197-222。  new window
50.莊文忠(20081200)。績效衡量與指標設計：方法論上的討論。公共行政學報，29，61-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.鄭錫鍇、廖洲棚(20090300)。公共職訓委外績效評估指標之研究：以行政院勞委會職訓局為例。公共行政學報，30，33-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.戴純眉(2005)。中央機關施政計畫管制考核制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊翠華(1972)。中國行政業務管制考核制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Carter, Neil、Klein, Rudolf、Day, Patricia(1992)。How Organisations Measure Success: The Use of Performance Indicators in Government。Routledge。  new window
2.邢祖援(1999)。規劃與控制。臺北：文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.宋達(1953)。行政三聯制的理論體系及實施方法。臺北：大地。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1973)。推行管考制度發揮業務控制功能事例。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Walshe, K.、Harvey, G.、Jas, P.(2010)。Connecting knowledge and performance in public service: from knowing to doing。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Talbot, Colin(2010)。Theories of performance: organizational and service improvement in the public domain。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Van Dooren, Wouter、Van de Walle, Steven(2008)。Performance Information in the Public Sector: how it is used。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
8.Halachmi, A.、Bouckaert, G.(1996)。Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting。Westport, CO：Greenwood。  new window
9.Ashworth, R.、Boyne, G. A.、Entwistle, T.(2010)。Public service improvement: theories and evidence。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.黨政工作考核委員會(1941)。黨政工作考核辦法。臺北：黨政工作考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.銓敍部(1986)。行政管理論文選集。臺北：銓敍部。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃貴造、顏秋來、劉淑貞(2008)。耕餘園--陳庚金七秩紀實。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
13.杜善良(1985)。經建計畫的評估與考核。臺北：六國。  延伸查詢new window
14.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013)。研考45：傳承研考精神．永續國家發展。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.Van Dooren, W.、Bouckaert, G.、Halligan, J.(2010)。Performance management in the public sector。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
16.丘昌泰、曹俊漢、蘇彩足(1999)。行政院幕僚機關業務功能整合之研究。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
17.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1973)。管制考核有關指示及法令彙編。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
18.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1980)。研考制度的建立與發展：行政院研究發展考核委員會成立十年回顧與展望。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
19.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1987)。行政院研究發展考核委員會七十五年報。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
20.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1989)。先總統蔣公行政管理言論選輯。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
21.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1989)。行政院研究發展考核委員會成立二十週年特刊。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
22.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1996)。推行管考制度發揮業務控制功能事例彙（82-85年）。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
23.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1999)。中華民國政府研究發展與管制考核體系之建立與發展。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
24.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1999)。研考三十：行政院研究發展考核委員會成立三十週年專輯。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
25.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009)。研考40重要檔案專刊。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
26.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009)。研考40．前瞻創新 優質政府治理推手。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
27.Mintzberg, Henry(1979)。The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research。Prentice-Hall。  new window
28.de Bruijn, H.(2001)。Managing Performance in the Public Sector。London：Routledge。  new window
29.Weiss, Carol H.(1998)。Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies。Prentice Hall。  new window
其他
1.鄒景雯(20131222)。宋楚瑜：施政沒追蹤就沒執行力，http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/paper/740536， 2013/12/24。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Walshe, K.、Harvey, G.、Jas, P.(2010)。knowledge and performance- theory and practice。Connecting knowledge and performance in public service: from knowing to doing。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Sommer, L.(1937)。Cameralism。Encyclopaedia of the social sciences。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
3.Radnor, Z.(2008)。Hitting the target and missing the point? Developing an understanding of organizational gaming。Performance information in the public sector: how it is used。Hampshire, UK：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Rainey, H. G.、Jung, C. S.(2010)。Extending goal ambiguity research in government: from organizational goal ambiguity to programme goal ambiguity。Public management and performance: research directions。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Smith, P.(2006)。Quantitative approaches towards assessing organizational performance。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Pollitt, C.(2000)。How do we know how good public services are?。Governance in the twenty-first century: revitalizing the public service。Montreal, MT：McGill-Queen's University Press。  new window
7.Pandey, S. K.、Moynihan, D.(2006)。Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Chun, Y. H.、Rainey, H. G.(2006)。Consequences of goal ambiguity in public organizations。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Farazmand, A.(1997)。Professionalism, bureaucracy, and modern governance: a comparative analysis。Modern systems of government: explaining the role of bureaucrats and politicians。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
10.Brewer, G. A.(2006)。All measures of performance are subjective: more evidence on US federal agencies。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Brewer, G.、Walker, R. M.(2010)。Red tape: the bane of public organization?。Public management and performance: research directions。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Chang, S-H.(1996)。Performance monitoring in Taiwan: issue and observations。Organization performance and measurement in the public sector--toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting。Westport, CO：Greenwood。  new window
13.Andrews, Rhys、Boyne, G. A.、Walker, R. M.(2006)。Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: an empirical exploration。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.魏鏞(1986)。我國「管制」與「考核」作業的現況及未來努力重點。考核評估專論選輯。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.魏鏞(1985)。我國「管制」與「考核」制度及今後努力方向。管考評估作業論文集。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃慶祥(1985)。追蹤列管與評估作業。管考評估作業論文集。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
17.張柏森(2004)。行政機關施政績效評估作業要點推動現況。政府績效評估。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳海雄、吳美雲、余敏雄(2004)。政府部門施政計畫績效管理實務。政府績效評估。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
19.施卿琛(2004)。政府部門專案追蹤作業實務。政府績效評估。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
20.沈鵑(1958)。國民政府時期行政改革之回顧。行政改革言論集。臺北：總統府臨時行政改革委員會。  延伸查詢new window
21.何沙崙(1993)。現行行政機關考成作業構想與作法。行政績效評估專論選輯。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
22.Addicott, R.、Ferlie, E.(2006)。A qualitative evaluation of public sector organizations: assessing organizational performance in healthcare。Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management。Cambridge University Press。  new window
23.林嘉誠(2004)。行政機關績效評估制度的建置與回顧。政府績效評估。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：859（臺灣：745，外國：114） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1068971 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66890225
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上