:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社區矯治之政策與法制改革
書刊名:東吳法律學報
作者:蕭宏宜 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Hung-yi
出版日期:2015
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:社區矯治非機構性處遇刑罰替代措施社會復歸觀護制度Community correctionsNon-institutional treatmentPunishment alternativesSocial rehabilitationProbation system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:24
相較於先進國家不斷深化的社區矯治措施,我國囿於人力與經費不足、理論面的研究與發展欠缺,導致實際上呈現出來的運作,往往是圍繞著疏解超額收容所為的思考。本文透過對美、加、德的矯治策略介紹,除深入瞭解彼邦如何降低監禁人口與成本、擴張或強化社區矯治外,更將焦點置於其改善刑事司法實務的操作所為的種種努力。展望未來,既然有效的社會復歸可以降低再犯已獲得實證,設計多樣的轉向機制與治療計畫、漸進式的復歸機制,甚至透過如問題解決法庭等專責機構的設置、增加遵守社區監督的激勵措施等,均可供我們借鑒。
In contrast to the community correction measures that are constantly being refined by the advanced countries, as a result of being hampered by insufficient manpower and funding, as well as by a lack of theoretical research and development, the efforts to reform the correction system actually taken in Taiwan have been limited to mostly ineffectual thinking about ways to relieve the overcrowding of prison facilities. This research project through an introduction to corrective strategies in the US, Canada, and Germany to gain a deeper understanding of how other countries reduce the incarcerated population and incarceration costs, and how they have expanded and strengthened community corrections, and further examine in detail the various initiatives taken to improve criminal justice practices in these countries. Looking ahead to the future, since it has been verified that effective rehabilitation can reduce recidivism, Taiwan can find much to learn from in these countries' design of various diversion mecha nisms, treatment programs, and progressive rehabilitation mechanisms, and even their establishment of dedicated organizations such as "problem-solving courts" and greater respect given to the incentives measure of community supervision.
期刊論文
1.馬躍中(20130300)。德國電子監控制度之探討。高大法學論叢,8(2),67+69+71+73-113+115-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林順昌(20091000)。論釋字662號與刑法第41條之修正論易服社會勞動之建構--兼評法務部之行政解釋與相關規定。中央警察大學法學論集,17,137-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.馬躍中(20140300)。德國社區矯治法制之研究。警學叢刊,44(5)=213,29-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bonta, J.(2008)。Exploring the blackbox of community supervision。JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION,47,248-270。  new window
5.Bonta, J.(2011)。An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidencebased community supervision。CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR,38,1127-1148。  new window
6.Bonta, James(2013)。Taking the Leap: From Pilot Project to Wide-Scale Implementation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS)。JUSTICE RESEARCH AND POLICY,15(1),1-19。  new window
7.Cullen, Francis T.(2011)。Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our future-the American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland address。CRIMINOLOGY,49,287-330。  new window
8.DeMatteo, David、LaDuke, Casey、Locklair, Benjamin R.、Heilbrun, Kirk(2013)。Community-based alternatives for justice-involved individuals with severe mental illness: Diversion, problem-solving courts, and reentry。JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,41(2),64-71。  new window
9.Klingele, Cecelia(2013)。Rethinking the use of community supervision。J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY,103,1015-1070。  new window
10.Norman, David J.(2013)。Stymied by the Stigma of a Criminal Conviction: Connecticut and the Struggle to Relieve Collateral Consequences。QUINNIPIAC L. REV,31,985-1041。  new window
11.Ellenbogen, Philip(2009)。Beyond the Border: A Comparative Look at Prison Rape in the United. States and Canada。COLUM. J.L. & SOC. PROBS,42,335-372。  new window
12.Pinard, Michael(2010)。Reflections and perspectives on reentry and collateral consequences。THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY,100,1213-1224。  new window
13.Portillo, Shannon、Rudes, Danielle S.、Viglione, Jill(2013)。Front-stage stars and backstage producers: The role of judges in problem-solving courts。VICTIMS & OFFENDERS,8(1),1-22。  new window
14.Sapers, Howard、Zinger, Ivan(2010)。The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections。PACE L. REV.,30,1512-1528。  new window
15.Steiner, Benjamin、Wada, James、Hemmens, Craig、Burton, Jr., Velmer S.(2005)。Correctional Orientation of Community Corrections: Legislative Changes in the Legally Prescribed Functions of Community Corrections 1992-2002。AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,29(2),141-159。  new window
16.Böttcher, Reinhard、Mayer, Elmar(1993)。Änderungen des Strafverfahrensrechts durch das Entlastungsgesetz。NStZ,153-158。  new window
17.Walter, Michael(1983)。Wandlungen in der Reaktion auf Kriminalität - Zur kriminologischen, kriminalpolitischen und insbesondere dogmatischen Bedeutung von Diversion。ZStW,95,32-68。  new window
18.Weigend, Thomas(1997)。Das Opportunitätsprinzip zwischen Einzelfallgerechtigkeit und Systemef zienz。ZStW,109,103-121。  new window
19.李建良(20111101)。請求假釋的權利與假釋決定的救濟--釋字第691號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌,187,20-30。  延伸查詢new window
20.盧映潔(20100300)。臺灣刑罰執行與變更中的問題與改革--以易科罰金及易服社會勞動為探討重點。法學新論,20,31-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.jur. Hans-Jürgen Kerner、馬躍中(20130700)。Die zentrale Bedeutung von finanziellen Sanktionen im Allgemeinen Strafrecht und im Jugendstrafrecht Deutschlands。國立中正大學法學集刊,40,187-213+215-252。new window  new window
22.邱忠義(20090600)。刑法(罰)易刑處分之社會勞動制度。月旦法學教室,80,92-105。  延伸查詢new window
23.薛智仁(20100800)。限制短期自由刑之制裁體系改革方向--兼評易服社會勞動之增訂。政大法學評論,116,239-291。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.林順昌(20090500)。易刑處分刑事政策之務實與樂觀--評短期刑轉向社會勞動制度。法學新論,10,71-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫啟俊(2011)。電子監控個案研討。「電子監控法制化」學術研討會。東海大學法學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.監察院(2010)。監獄、看守所收容人處遇、超收及教化問題之檢討專案調查研究報告。監察院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周愫嫻、李茂生、林育聖、Hebenton, Bill(2011)。我國矯治政策與管理機制之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.ALARID, LEANNE F.、REICHEL, PHILIP L.(2013)。CORRECTIONS。  new window
3.ASHWORTH, ANDREW、REDMAYNE, MIKE(2010)。THE CRIMINAL PROCESS。  new window
4.BERGER, RONALD J.、FREE J. R.、MARVIN, D.、SEARLES, PATRICIA CRIME(2005)。JUSTICE, AND SOCIETY: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINOLOGY。  new window
5.CARLSON, RONALD L.(2010)。CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCEDURE。  new window
6.Christian, J.(2006)。Corrections and Conditional Release in Canada an Overview。  new window
7.LILLY, J. ROBERT、CULLEN, FRANCIS T.、BALL, RICHARD A.(2011)。CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES: CONTEXTS AND CONSEQUENCES。  new window
8.ROBERTS, JULIAN、GROSSMAN, MICHELLE(2011)。CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN CANADA: A READER。  new window
9.TRAVIS, JEREMY、WESTERN, BRUCE(2014)。THE GROWTH OF INCARCERATION IN THE UNITED STATES: EXPLORING CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES。  new window
10.Bock, Michael(2013)。Kriminologie。München。  new window
11.Frehsee, Detlev(1987)。Schadenswiedergutmachung als Instrument strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle: ein kriminalpolitischer Beitrag zur Suche nach alternativen Sanktionsformen。Berlin。  new window
12.Pfeiffer, Christian(1986)。Kriminalprävention im Jugendgerichtsverfahren -Jugendrichterlichen Handeln vor dem Hintergrund des Brücke-Projeckts。Diss。  new window
13.Roxin, Claus(1992)。Zur Wiedergutmachung als einer "dritten Spur" im Sanktionensystem。FS-Baumann。  new window
14.Meier, Bernd-Dieter(2009)。Strafrechtliche Sanktionen。Berlin:Springer。  new window
15.許福生(201209)。犯罪與刑事政策學。台北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
16.Kerner, Hans-Jürgen、許澤天、薛智仁(2008)。德國刑事追訴與制裁--成年刑法與少年刑法之現狀分析與改革構想。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.林順昌(2009)。觀護法論:社會復歸與社會防衛之間的拔河。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Schwind, Hans-Dieter、Böhm, Alexander、Jehle, Jörg-Martin、Laubenthal, Klaus(2009)。Strafvollzugsgesetz - Bund und Länder: Kommentar。  new window
19.Roxin, Claus、Schünemann, Bernd(2012)。Strafverfahrensrecht。  new window
20.Beulke, Werner(2012)。Strafprozessrecht。C. F. Müller。  new window
其他
1.HELENE DE VOS,GILBERT, ELLI(2014)。REDUCING PRISON POPULATION: OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ON ALTERNATIVES TO IMPRISONMENT AT EUROPEAN LEVEL,http://www.reducingprison.eu/downloads/files/ReducingprisonpopulationEuropeanframework_FIN_101014.pdf。  new window
2.JUSTICE CENTER(2013)。LESSONS FROM THE STATES: REDUCING RECIDIVISM AND CURBING CORRECTIONS COSTS THROUGH JUSTICE REINVESTMENT,http://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/FINAL_State_Lessons_mbedit.pdf。  new window
3.MCGARRY, PEGGY(2013)。POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND REDUCE INCARCERATION,http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/potential-of-community-corrections.pdf。  new window
4.(2011)。PEW CENTER ON THE STATES, STATE OF RECIDIVISM: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF AMERICA'S PRISONS,http://www.pewtrusts.org/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/sentencing_and_corrections/StateRecidivismRevolvingDoorAmericaPrisons20pdf.pdf。  new window
5.(2012)。PEW CENTER ON THE STATES, TIME SERVED: THE HIGH COST, LOW RETURN OF LONGER PRISON TERMS,http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/docs/Report-Prison_Time_Served.pdf。  new window
6.SUBRAMANIAN, RAM,TUBLITZ, REBECCA(2012)。REALIGNING JUSTICE RESOURCES: A REVIEW OF POPULATION SPENDING SHIFTS IN PRISON AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS,http://www.vera.org/files/Full%20Report.pdf。  new window
7.SUBRAMANIAN, RAM,SHAMES, ALISON(2013)。SENTENCING AND PRISON PRACTICES IN GERMANY AND THE NETHERLANDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES,http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/european-american-prison-report-v3.pdf。  new window
8.SUBRAMANIAN, RAM,DELANEY, RUTH(2014)。PLAYBOOK FOR CHANGE? STATES RECONSIDER MANDATORY SENTENCES,http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/mandatory-sentences-policy-report-v2b.pdf。  new window
9.SUBRAMANIAN, RAM,MORENO, REBECKA,BROOMHEAD, SHARYN(2014)。RECALIBRATING JUSTICE: A REVIEW OF 2013 STATE SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS TRENDS,http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/state-sentencing-and-corrections-trends-2013-v2.pdf。  new window
10.SUBRAMANIAN, RAM,MORENO, REBECKA(2014)。DRUG WAR DÉTENTE? A REVIEW OF STATE-LEVEL DRUG LAW REFORM, 2009-2013,http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/state-drug-law-reform-review-2009-2013.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.張麗卿(2012)。刑事訴訟近年改革的脈動與展望。刑事法學現代化動向:黃東熊教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集。台灣法學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hirsch, Hans Joachim(1999)。Bilanz der Strafrechtsreform。Gedächtnisschrift für Hilde Kaufmann, Berlin /NewYork, 1986. Kury, Helmut, Zum Stand der Behandlungsforschung oder vom nothing works zum something works。FS-Böhm。  new window
3.Sessar, Karl、Hering, Rainer, D.(1985)。Bedeutung und Reichweite Pädagogisch Gemeinter Verfahreneinstellungen durch den Jugendstaatsanwalt: Das Beispiel des “Lübecker Modells”。Kriminologische Forschung in der Diskussion。Köln。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE