針對李維倫與葉光輝對於我撰寫之「靶子論文」所作的評論，本文逐一作出回應：「多元哲學典範」並非意指：每位研究者均可依照自己的目的，採用不同的哲學典範，來從事研究。它是我為了建構「含攝文化的理論」，而發展出來的一套既定的研究程序，這樣的研究成果可以利用來發展更多「含攝文化的理論」，卻很難加以複製。更清楚地說，這種研究取徑可以幫助在「儒家文化區」從事研究工作的學術社群認清其「知識論主體」。一位社會科學工作者以自己的「視域」為基礎，對我的研究成果進行辯證性的詮釋，進而建構其「含攝文化的理論」，則可能完成其學術的個別主體。

In responding to the comments on my ＂Target Article＂ made by Prof. Lee & Yeh, this paper emphasizes that ＂multiple philosophical paradigms＂ does not mean that every researcher may follow any philosophical paradigm to accomplish the academic goal of his/her research works. It is a particular procedure of research which I used to construct culture-inclusive theories of psychology. My academic performance might be utilized to develop more culture-inclusive theories in a variety of domains, but it is very hard to replicate it. This approach my help the scientific community of Confucian cultural zone to recognize their epistemological subjectivity. If a researcher decides to construct his/her horizon, S/he might accomplish his/her personal subjectivity.