臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：親屬安置的困境與爭議性議題之探究：實務工作者的觀點
書刊名：社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者：吳書昀 引用關係／蕭琮琦／劉美芝／邱仕杰／徐宜瑩／賴宏維
作者(外文)：Wu, Jessie Shu-yun／Hsiao, Chung-chi／Liu, Connie Mei-chih／Chiu, Shih-chieh／Hsu, Yi-ying／Lai, Hong-wei
出版日期：2015
卷期：19:2
頁次：頁31-74
主題關鍵詞：親屬安置；兒少家外安置；替代性服務；分析階層；Kinship care placement；Out of home care；Substitutional services；Analytic hierarchy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:64
親屬安置是替代性服務的一環，中外研究顯示，兒少安置於親屬家中可增加安置的穩定度，兒少的被遺棄感較少，對自我及對種族文化的認同較強，其適應也較佳。然而在臺灣，親屬安置卻是不受實務工作者青睞的家外安置管道。因之，本研究期待瞭解實務工作者在實施親屬安置時的相關經驗，特別是其所面臨的挑戰以及對某些爭議性議題的思考，以進一步提出具體建議。本研究以焦點團體、個別訪談以及開放式問卷等三種方法蒐集資料。經質性分析發現，實務工作者所提出之親屬安置的困境與爭議性議題可歸納為三個核心主軸，分別為「法令規範與實務操作：各彈各的調？」、「親屬安置的範疇與費用補助：親情無價抑或照顧者平等？」、「專業訓練的執行：堅持專業抑或信任親情？」據此，本研究建議：應讓親屬安置的實施於法有據，以同時保障兒少及實務工作者的利益；國家與親屬在替代性服務中的角色需要不斷釐清；教育訓練應發揮親屬安置的獨特性，以利兒少在熟悉的家庭環境中接受專業的照顧。
Kinship care placement is part of the substitutional services. Research supports that children who are placed in kinship families experience fewer changes in foster care settings and less feeling of abandoned. Children in kinship homes tend to have higher self and ethnic identities, and can adapt better. However, kinship care placement is not always practitioners' favorite option in Taiwan in terms of placing children. This study aims to understand related experience the practitioners have when they adopt kinship care placement, especially those challenges and debating issues they encounter. This study expects to propose concrete suggestions for implementing kinship care placement. For collecting data, focus groups, individual interviews and open-ended questionnaires are adopted in the study. There are three main findings regarding the difficulties and controversies in kinship care placement: First, the legal regulations and the practical situations are not on the same page. Second, the practitioners show different understandings of the definition of 'kin' and the financial supports for kinship carers. Third, different points of view are expressed by the practitioners on professional trainings for kinship carers. According to what study have found out, we suggest that kinship care placement should be supported by legal systems to protect the wellbeing of children as well as practitioners. We also suggest that there should be a very clear role of the state and the kinship carers in the substitutional services. Finally, the uniqueness of kinship care placement need to be promoted by professional trainings, so as to provide children a safe and familiar setting.
期刊論文
1.趙善如、王仕圖、許坋妃、李慧玲(20120600)。與政府的合作--親屬寄養照顧者的照顧經驗。臺灣社會福利學刊，10(2)，37-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Boetto, H.(2010)。Kinship Care: A Review of Issues。Family Matters，85，60-67。  new window
3.Bratteli, M.、Bjelde, K.、Pigatti, L.(2008)。Grandparent and Kinship Foster Care: Implications of Licensing and Payment Policies。Journal of Gerontological Social Work，51(3)，228-246。  new window
4.Broad, B.(2004)。Kinship Care for Children in the UK: Message from Research, Lessons for Policy and Practice。European Journal of Sodal Work，7(2)，211-227。  new window
5.Burgess, C.、Rossvoll, F.、Wallace, B.、Daniel, B.(2010)。‘It’s Just Like Another Home, Just Another Family, so It’s Nae Different' : Children’s Voices in Kinship Care: A Research Study About the Experience of Children in Kinship Care in Scotland。Child and Family Social Work，15(3)，297-306。  new window
6.Denby, R. W.(2011)。Kinship Liaisons: A Peer-to-peer Approach to Supporting Kinship Caregivers。Children and Youth Services Review，33(2)，217-225。  new window
7.Farmer, E.(2010)。What Factors Relate to Good Placement Outcomes in Kinship Care?。British Journal of Social Work，40(2)，426-444。  new window
8.Fechter-Leggett, M. O.、O'Brien, K.(2010)。The Effects of Kinship Care on Adult Mental Health Outcomes of Alumni of Foster Care。Children and Youth Services Review，32(2)，206-213。  new window
9.Geen, R.(2004)。The Evolution of Kinship Care Policy and Practice。The Future of Children，14(1)，130-149。  new window
10.Gibbs, P.、Muller, U.(2000)。Kinship Forster Care Moving to the Mainstream: Controversy, Policy, and Outcomes。Adoption Quarterly，4(2)，57-87。  new window
11.Gleeson, J. P.、Craig, L. C.(1994)。Kinship Care in Child Welfare: An Analysis of States’ Policies。Children and Youth Services，16(1/2)，7-31。  new window
12.Harris, M. S.、Skyles, A.(2008)。Kinship Care for African American Children: Disproportionate and Disadvantageous。Journal of Family Issues，29(8)，1013-1030。  new window
13.Koh, E.(201003)。Permanency Outcomes of Children in Kinship and Non-kinship Foster Care: Testing the External Validity of Kinship Effects。Children and Youth Services，32(3)，389-398。  new window
14.O'Brien, V.(2012)。The Benefits and Challenges of Kinship Care。Child Care in Practice，18(2)，127-146。  new window
15.Ryan, J. P.、Hong, J. S.、Herz, D.、Hernandez, P. M.(2010)。Kinship Foster Care and the Risk of Juvenile Delinquency。Children and Youth Services Review，32(12)，1823-1830。  new window
16.Rybum, M.(1998)。New Model of Welfare: Re-asserting the Value of Kinship for Children in State Care。Social Policy and Administration，32(1)，28-45。  new window
17.Smith, C. J.、Monahan, D. J.(2007)。KinNET: A Demonstration Project for a National Support Network for Kinship Care Providers。Journal of Health & Social Policy，22(3)，215-231。  new window
18.Spence, N.(2004)。Kinship Care in Australia。Child Abuse Review，13(4)，263-276。  new window
19.Swann, C. A.、Sylvester, M. S.(2006)。Does the Child Welfare System Serve the Neediest Kinship Care Families?。Children and Youth Services Review，28(10)，1213-1228。  new window
20.Zinn, A.(2010)。A Typology of Kinship Foster Families: Latent Class and Exploratory Analyses of Kinship Family Structure and Household Composition。Children and Youth Services，32(3)，325-337。  new window
21.Shera, M.、Swann, C. A.(2007)。The Take-up of Cash Assistance among Private Kinship Care Families。Children and Youth Services Review，29(8)，973-987。  new window
22.余漢儀(20050900)。親屬寄養之迷思：家族責任抑或國家分擔。社會政策與社會工作學刊，9(2)，1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Boisen, Laura、Beeman, Sandra(1999)。Child Welfare Professionals' Attitudes toward Kinship Foster Care。Child Welfare，78(3)，315-337。  new window
會議論文
1.梁思涵(2011)。從兒少親屬家庭生活適應談高雄市親屬寄養服務。「服務危機中的兒少，建構支持家庭功能」國際研討會。臺北：臺灣世界展望會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳書昀(2012)。親屬安置照顧者及親屬安置家庭之現況與特質分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙善如、王仕圖(2008)。高雄市兒童少年親屬寄養成效評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江惠月(2009)。社工員親屬寄養認知與寄養品質指標之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Peterson, R. A.(1999)。Constructing effective questionnaires。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
2.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare(2000)。Child Protection Australia 1998-1999。Canberra：Australian Institute of Health and Welfare。  new window
3.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare(2013)。Child Protection Australia 2011-2012。Canberra：Australian Institute of Health and Welfare。  new window
4.Connolly, M.(2003)。Kinship Care: A Selected Literature。Wellington：Department of Child, Youth and Family。  new window
5.Jantz, A.、Geen, R.、Bess, R.、Andrews, C.、Russell, V.(2002)。The Continuing Evolution of State Kinship Care Policies。Washington, DC：The Urban Institute。  new window
6.Leos-Urbel, J.、Bess, R.、Geen, R.(2000)。State Policies for Assessing and Supporting Kinship Foster Parents。Washington, DC：The Urban Institute。  new window
7.Save the Children(2007)。Kinship Care: Providing Positive and Safe Care for Children Living Away from Home。London：Save the Children。  new window
8.Uniting Care(2010)。Grandparent Kinship Care in NSW。NSW：Uniting Care Children, Young People and Families。  new window
9.Wilson, R. G.、Crewe, S. E.(2007)。Tradition and Policy Perspectives in Kinship Care。Binghamton：The Haworth Press。  new window
10.Yardley, A.、Mason, J.、Watson, E.(2009)。Kinship Care in NSW: Finding a Way Forward。Australia：Association of Children's Welfare Agencies。  new window
11.Bryman, Alan(2008)。Social Research Methods。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市：心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.衛生福利部統計處(2015)。兒童及少年保護處理安置情形，http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/StatiStic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4179。  延伸查詢new window
2.Child Welfare Information Gateway(2015)。Foster Care Statistics 2013，https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/foster.pdf， 2015/10/10。  new window
3.Department of Health and Human Services(1992)。Using Relative for Foster Care，http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-90-02390.pdf， 2014/12/10。  new window
4.Department for Children, Schools and Families(2010)。Support for All: the Families and Relationships Green Paper，http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eorderingdownload/cm-7787.pdfl， 2014/12/10。  new window
5.Council, Southward(2008)。Kinship Care Policy and Procedures: Children’s Specialist Services，http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/Data/Corporate%20Parenting%20 Committee/20081119/Agenda/Item%2010Appendix%201%20 Kinship%20policy.pdf， 2014/12/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.Anderson, G.(2001)。Formal and Informal Kinship Care。Balancing Family-centered Services and Child Well-being: Exploring Issues in Policy, Practice, Theory, and Research。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Geen, R.(2003)。Providing Services to Kinship Foster Care Families。Kinship Care: Making the Most of a Valuable Resource。Washington, DC：The Urban Institute Press。  new window
3.Spencer, L.、Ritchie, J.、O'Connor, W.(2003)。Analysis: Practices, Principles and Processes。Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers。London, England：Sage。  new window
4.Templeman, A. J.(2003)。Licensing and Payment of Kinship Foster Parents。Kinship Care:.Making theMost of a Valuable Resource。Washington, DC：The Urban Institute Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：961（臺灣：933，外國：28） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67478434
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上