:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:計程車共乘行為意向的影響因素之研究
書刊名:都市交通
作者:陳惠國盧柏叡
作者(外文):Chen, Huey-kuoLu, Bo-rui
出版日期:2015
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁113-135
主題關鍵詞:計程車共乘計畫行為理論結構方程模式Safety assessment modelImpedance between the O-D pairGISDecision support system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:101
計程車共乘為紓緩交通擁擠及停車問題的重要選項之一,不僅可以減少等候時間及降低車資支出,支援大眾運輸系統運能之不足,亦可增加乘客的選擇,減少自用小客車旅次。為了評估計程車共乘之行為意向,本研究先以計劃行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB)為基礎,確立態度、主觀規範及知覺行為控制等三個構念,另透過國內外文獻回顧,增加安全、費率與時間三個 影響因素,然後進行研究架構的設計。 本研究以劍潭捷運站至文化大學之計乘車共乘路線的現行及潛在使用者為對象,進行問卷調查,並利用結構方程模式(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)檢驗構面關係的假設。結果發現,主觀規範、知覺行為控制、時間及費率四個構面對於行為意向具有顯著的影響,顯示在各項配套措施完善的條件下,乘客會更願意使用計程車共乘服務。在另一方面,安全因素之影響並不顯著,表示乘客對於該條路線之計乘車共乘服務並未有安全之顧慮,因此推論其現有之安全措施適當,值得做為其他地點設置計程車共乘服務的重要參考。
Taxi sharing is an efficient measure to mitigate traffic congestion and parking problems. It can increase the total number of trips using the current para-transit systems and hence reduce the number of trips by private vehicles. This research adopts the well-known theory of planned behavior (TPB) to identify three important constructs, i.e., attitude, subjective norm and perception that affect travelers’ intention on taxisharing services. In addition, by way of literature review, three more constructs, i.e., safety, rate, and travel time are also identified. With these six influential factors on behavior intention, structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was adopted for analysis. To collect real data, a questionnaire survey was conducted with the current and potential passengers using the existing taxisharing services between Jiantan Metro Station and Chinese Culture University. With this real data, six hypotheses were constructed and examined. The results indicate that the four factors, i.e., subject norm, perceived behavior control, time as well as rate, do have significant influences on consumer behavior intention for taxi sharing services. Therefore more taxisharing services at other places are encouraged if the four other influential factors can be well treated. On the contrary the safety doesn’t have significant effect on passengers’ behavior intentions, implying that the taxisharing passengers have no concern about crime.
期刊論文
1.MacCallum, R. C.(1986)。Specification searches in covariance structure modeling。Psychological Bulletin,100(1),107-120。  new window
2.Laudenslager, M. S.、Holt, D. T.、Lofgren, S. T.(2004)。Understanding air force members' intentions to participate in pro-environmental behaviors: An application of the theory of planned behavior。Perceptual & Motor Skills,98(3),1162-1170。  new window
3.何依栖(19891200)。都會區計程車共乘制度實施及管理之探討。運輸計劃,18(4),507-518。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周文生(20100600)。計程車共乘管理制度之探討。都市交通,25(1),18-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.覃運梅、石琴(2006)。出租車合乘模式的探討。合肥工業大學學報,29(1),77-79。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alpizar, F.、Carlsson, F.(2003)。Policy Implications and Analysis of the Determinants of travel Mode Choice: An Application of Choice Experiments to Metropolitan Costa Rica。Environment and Development Economics,8(56),603-619。  new window
7.Ajzen, I.(1985)。The Theory of Planned Behavior。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2),179-211。  new window
8.Andrey, J.、Burns, K.、Doherty, S.(2004)。Toward Sustainable Transportation: Exploring Transportation Decision Making in Teleworking Households in a Mid-sized Canadian City。Canadian Journal of Urban Research,13(2),257。  new window
9.Ford, F. C.、McCallum, R. C.、Tait, M.(1986)。The Application of Exploratory Factory Factor Analysis in Applied Psychology: A Critical Review and Analysis。Personnel Psychology,39(2),219-314。  new window
10.Giuliano, G.(1992)。Transportation Demand Management Promise or Panacea。Journal of the American Planning Association,58(3),327-335。  new window
11.Kaplan, D.(1990)。Evaluating and Modifying Covariance Structure Analysis: A Review and Recommendation。Multivariate Behavioral Research,25(2),137-155。  new window
12.Levin, I.(1982)。Measuring Tradeoffs in Carpool Driving Arrangement Preferences。Transportation,11(1),71-85。  new window
13.Rose, G.(2002)。Providing Premium Carpool Parking Using A Low-Tech ITS Initiative。Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal,72(7),32-36。  new window
14.Tischer, M.、Dobson, R.(1979)。An Empirical Analysis of Behavioural Intentions of Single-Occupant Auto Drivers to Shift to High Occupancy Vehicle。Transportation Research,13A(3),143-158。  new window
15.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
16.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
會議論文
1.周文生、李欣育(2009)。消費者選擇計程車共乘行為意向之研究。中華民國運輸學會學術論文研討會。桃園。469-487。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓復華、顏鴻祥(2009)。影響小汽車共乘行為因子之研究--以新竹市地區為例。中華民國運輸學會學術論文研討會。桃園。249-274。  延伸查詢new window
3.Enoch, Marcus、Potter, Stephen、Parkhurst, Graham、Smith, Mark(2006)。Why Do Demand Responsive Transport Systems Fail?。Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting,(會議日期: 2006/01/22-01/26)。Washington, DC。  new window
4.Lalos, P.、Korres, A.、Datsikas, C. K.、Tombras, G. S.、Peppas, K.(2009)。A Framework for Dynamic Car and Taxi Pools with the Use of Positioning Systems。The 2009 Computation World: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns,385-391。  new window
5.Sun, X.、Golightly, D.、Sharples, S.、Bedwell, B.(2012)。User Requirements and Constraints for On-Demand Taxi Sharing Technology。The international conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors 2012,409-416。  new window
6.Tao, C.(2007)。Dynamic Taxi-Sharing Service Using Intelligent Transportation System Technologies。2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing。  new window
7.Vieira, V.、Fialho, A.、Martinez, V.、Brito, J.、Duran, A.(2012)。An Exploratory Study on the Use of Collaborative Riding Based on Gamification as a Support to Public Transportation。Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems。  new window
8.Xin, W.、Zhu, S.、Wang, H.、Yan, Y.、Xiong, J.(2009)。Analyzing Early Market Potential and Strategies for Carpooling in China: A Case Study of Wuhan。2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science。  new window
研究報告
1.Clark, J.、Fichtner, M.、Holliday, D.、Woods, G.、Summerlee, R.(2010)。Carpooling in Sumner-Redcliffs: Viable or Not?。  new window
學位論文
1.許采蘋(2005)。計程車共乘與撥召計程車可行條件之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳永朋(2007)。台北都會區捷運與公車轉乘優惠效益之分析(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Long, J. S.(1983)。Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Leamer, Edward E.(1978)。Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.交通部(2012)。臺灣地區計程車營運狀況調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
4.季鈞管理顧問股份有限公司(2013)。一百零一年度臺北地區計程車營運情形調查。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳惠國(2010)。研究分析方法。台中市:滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Casba, T.(2012)。Carpooling and Carsharing in Hungary: Barriers, Possibilities, Potentials。Budapest:Central European University。  new window
7.Costa, D.(2009)。Performance and Design of Taxi Services at Airport Passenger Terminals。Lisbon:Universidade Técnica de Lisboa。  new window
8.Ozanne, L.、Mollenkopf, D.(1999)。Understanding Consumer Intentions to Carpool: A Test of Alternative Models。Lincoln University。  new window
9.Redmiles, E.(2013)。Human Factors and Requirements for a Successful Mobile Platform Dynamic Taxi-Share System in the USA。Maryland:University of Maryland。  new window
10.黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
12.Diamantopoulos, Adamantios、Siguaw, Judy A.(2000)。Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated。Sage。  new window
13.陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hoyle, R. H.、Panter, A. T.(1995)。Writing about Structural Equation Models。Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, And Applications。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE