This study found that the design industry in Korean apparently enjoys advantages over the industry in Taiwan. This could be contributed to the fact that the Korean government has a different focus on the design industrial policy, and its administration and supporting system. Our results based on data analysis and literature review shows that Taiwan have weaker intellectual property protection that Korea. Taiwan also do not conduct enough industrial policy research for the industry. In addition, the industrial policy in Taiwan also covers fewer target industries in Taiwan. By comparing the administration and supporting systems for the design industry in Taiwan and Korea, this study found that in Taiwan collaboration is weak among regional and national government institutions, and national and regional non-governmental organizations in Taiwan. Their role and responsibility are not properly defined and the policies are not executed effectively. This study recommends that Taiwan government could adjust the policy of design industrial together with the administration and supporting system by referring to the successful case in other countries such as Korea. The main area to be considered should be regularly review the policy coverage of design industry according to the requirements of the socio-economic environment. The design department of corporation can also be included in the design nurture policy. The study also suggests that the progress of policy execution should be regularly checked by collecting the operational statistic in the designed industry. Taiwan government should also set up regional based design agencies and strengthen the collaboration among the official, semiofficial and unofficial agencies.