:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣家具設計受包浩斯風格之影響--以品牌家具「有情門」為例
書刊名:設計學報
作者:馮文君陳殿禮 引用關係
作者(外文):Fong, Wen-chunChen, Tien-li
出版日期:2019
卷期:24:4
頁次:頁17-40
主題關鍵詞:包浩斯風格家具設計內容分析法紮根理論Bauhaus styleFurniture designContent analysisGrounded theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:147
  • 點閱點閱:13
包浩斯藉由基礎課程發展設計理論啟發了後續的創造力,一百年來對全世界的建築、產品、空間、舞台、家具、服裝、平面設計等,產生深遠的影響。台灣的家具代工曾經是重要的製造業,家具產業從代工中學習包浩斯之風格與製造技術,過去的經驗成為自創品牌的養分。本研究目的在探討包浩斯風格對台灣品牌「有情門」家具設計之影響,研究採質量混合方法,以質性分析萃取「人本精神、人文精神、家具設計」構面,以及「機能、技術、造型、色彩、材質」要項,再發展為影響家具設計之問卷量表,請學者專家評估後,以PLS資料分析計算加權係數,發現「有情門」家具品牌之6件產品中,有2件高度符合包浩斯風格,並探討其產品在各構面要項與量表之符合情況。本研究彙整產出「包浩斯風格對家具設計之影響構面」、「有情門家具設計受包浩斯風格之影響構面」與「包浩斯風格對家具設計之影響問卷量表」,將包浩斯風格之豐富與複雜,轉化為家具或產品設計研發之策略、管理與評量工具,可作為理論研究及產業實務之參考。
The Bauhaus has inspired creativity through fundamental courses of design theories and deeply influenced design of architectures, products, spaces, stages, furniture, fashion, and graphics around the world in the past 100 years. When the Taiwanese government promoted the policies regarding subcontract works and trading, the furniture industry was able to get orders from large furniture companies in advanced countries and thus learned Bauhaus' modern design and manufacturing technologies from the subcontract works. Nowadays, in the face of global market changes and new industrial trends, these subcontract work experiences in the past have become the nutrition to create a self-owned brand. This study aimed to explore the influences of the Bauhaus style on furniture design in Taiwan, adopting the mixed methods approach with both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Through the qualitative analyses, the constructs, namely "human-centered spirit, humanistic spirit, furniture design", and the essential items, namely "function, technology, model, color, and material" were extracted to further develop a scale for the invited scholars and experts to evaluate the products. The PLS method was adopted to obtain the weights. It was found that 2 of the 6 "TW.U.C.M." products were designed in the Bauhaus style and the results were highly significant. Then further analyses were conducted to explore the performances of the products on the constructs and the items. The outputs of this study include the "constructs of the influences of the Bauhaus style on furniture design", the "constructs of the influences of the Bauhaus style on furniture designs of 'TW.U.C.M.", and the "influences of the Bauhaus style on furniture design of scale". The rich and complex of the Bauhaus style was converted into practical strategies and tools of management and evaluation for furniture or product design, and can serve as references for theoretical research and industrial practices.
期刊論文
1.杜瑞澤、吳志南(20050900)。消費者環保意識態度與綠色消費行為對綠色產品設計之影響--以家具為例。設計學報,10(3),21-35+37。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林榮泰(20091200)。文化創意產品設計:從感性科技、人性設計與文化創意談起。人文與社會科學簡訊,11(1),32-42。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bruhn, M.、Grund, M. A.(2000)。Theory, Development and Implementation of National Customer Satisfaction Indices: The Swiss Index of Customer Satisfaction (SWICS)。Total Quality Management,11(7),S1017-S1028。  new window
4.余泰魁、黃識銘(20050900)。供應商銷售人員工作滿意量表之建構。人力資源管理學報,5(3),49-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王麗卿、聶志高、陳國祥(20050600)。建築形式在家具設計上的關連性運用。設計學報,10(2),43-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.莊明振、蕭坤安(19961200)。建構圈椅風格的造形要素及其操作之探討。設計學報,1(1),51-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林俊良(20050700)。從包浩斯精神,探藝術與科技的新統一。玄奘資訊傳播學報,2,127-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林銘煌、王靜儀(20120600)。以眼動路徑探討多義圖形的辨識歷程。設計學報,17(2),49-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王麗卿、管倖生、陳殿禮(20110600)。臺灣木製家具產業意象與現況調查研究。設計研究學報,4,16-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.呂琪昌、林榮泰(20100600)。從包浩斯風格探討臺灣設計教育的展望。藝術欣賞,6(3),28-43。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐玉姈(20140300)。包浩斯設計教育以來的空間概念與設計詞彙初探。建築學報,87,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Dearstyne, H.(1962)。The Bauhaus revisited。Journal of Architectural Education,17(1),13-16。  new window
13.Gropius, W.、Dearstyne, H.(1963)。The Bauhaus contribution。Journal of Architectural Education (1947-1974),18(1),14-16。  new window
14.Jacobsen, T.(2002)。Kandinsky's questionnaire revisited: Fundamental correspondence of basic colors and forms?。Perceptual and Motor Skill,95(3),903-913。  new window
15.Le Masson, P.、Hatchuel, A.、Weil, B.(2016)。Design theory at Bauhaus: Teaching "splitting" knowledge。Research in Engineering Design,27(2),91-115。  new window
16.林志煒、Chen, Guang-dah(20140900)。History and Evolution of Kinetic Art (I): Kinetic Art before the Mid-20th Century。設計研究,10,61-69。  new window
17.Prager, P.(2006)。Back to the future: Interactivity and associational narrativity at the Bauhaus。Digital Creativity,17(4),195-204。  new window
18.Raby, G.(2019)。Teaching Bauhaus principles: On the importance of questioning why some things work too well。Theatre and Performance Design,5(1/2),43-60。  new window
19.萬胥亭(20070600)。Traduction et Transformation--Deux Modèles de la Herméneutique Contemporaine。淡江外語論叢,9,163-175。new window  new window
20.Yazar, T.、Tomark, A.、Qzturk, H.(2016)。Refection of Bauhaus furniture designs today furniture design as aesthetic production in the context of intercultural interaction and communication。International Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Art,1(1),105-128。  new window
21.Zhan, X.、Walker, S.(2019)。Craft as leverage for sustainable design transformation: A theoretical foundation。The Design Journal,22(4),503-523。  new window
22.王麗卿、聶志高(20041200)。地方性要素對臺灣光復後木製家具產業形態的影響。設計學報,9(4),107-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.姚村雄、孫祖玉(20110600)。設計文化的西風東漸--包浩斯時期的臺灣現代設計啟蒙。設計學研究,特刊,49-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.張妃滿(20051200)。康丁斯基在包浩斯的教育理念。造形藝術學刊,43-58。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳勇成、陳啟雄(20130700)。臺灣傳統木家具椅凳風格發展與當代工藝設計之展現與實踐。設計研究,9,97-108。  延伸查詢new window
26.馮文君(20190300)。文創品牌之策展設計與形象塑造:以「有情門」品牌為例。修平學報,38,15-83。  延伸查詢new window
27.羅秉祥(20070800)。西方人本主義倫理與基督教思想。輔仁宗教研究,15,75-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
29.林榮泰、林伯賢(20091000)。融合文化與美學促成文化創意設計新興產業之探討。藝術學報,85,81-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.馮永華、楊裕富(20060900)。「設計風格」形成因素之研究。設計學報,11(3),99-113+115。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(20050600)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李乾朗(2007)。台灣的古住宅與家具--從「家具」看台灣當代居住環境中的文化景觀。第一屆第二次學術研討會。台南:台灣家具產業協會。1-10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林品章(2009)。造型原理--藝術•設計的基礎。新北市:全華。  延伸查詢new window
2.Banham, Reyner(1960)。Theory and Design in the First Machine Age。The MIT Press。  new window
3.管倖生、阮綠茵、王明堂、王藍亭、李佩玲、高新發、盧麗淑(2006)。設計研究方法。臺北市:全華。  延伸查詢new window
4.王受之(1997)。世界現代設計。臺北:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bruhn, Manfred(2003)。Relationship Marketing: Management of Customer Relationships。London, England:Pearson Education Limited。  new window
6.王文科(2003)。課程與教學論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Baumhoff, A.、Droste, M.(2009)。Mythos Bauhaus。Berlin:Reimer。  new window
8.Droste, M.(2019)。Bauhaus: Updated edition。Cologne:Taschen。  new window
9.Lupton, E.、Miller, J. A.(2000)。The ABC's of Bauhaus, the Bauhaus and design theory。New York, NY:Princeton Architectural Press。  new window
10.Ringle, C. M.、Wende, S.、Will, A.(2005)。SmartPLS--version 2.0 M3。Hamburg:Hamburg Universitat。  new window
11.Whitford. F.、林育如(2013)。包浩斯。台北市:商周。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hair, Joseph F.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, R. E.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective。MacMillan。  new window
13.瞿宛文(20170000)。臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起:後進發展的為何與如何。臺北:中央研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1994)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE