臺灣版WHOQOL-OLD問卷之發展與驗證__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	臺灣版WHOQOL-OLD問卷之發展與驗證
書刊名：	臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者：	姚開屏／錢承君／張育誠／林韋伶／王榮德／謝清麟／林茂榮
作者(外文)：	Yao, Grace／Chien, Cheng-chun／Chang, Yu-chen／Lin, Wei-ling／Wang, Jung-der／Hsieh, Ching-lin／Lin, Mau-roung
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	36:3
頁次：	頁239-258
主題關鍵詞：	生活品質；老人；Quality of life；Senior；WHOQOL-100；WHOQOL-BREF；WHOQOL-OLD
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:10 點閱:7

目標：發展及驗證台灣版世界衛生組織老人生活品質問卷（WHOQOL-OLD）。方法：研究之初先以標準化程序進行問卷的翻譯，然後於2012年六至八月，以橫斷面研究設計在大台北地區與嘉義地區收集438名60歲以上社區老人的資料，包括WHOQOL-OLD、WHOQOL-BREF、短式台灣老年憂鬱量表（Geriatric Depression Scale-15, GDS-15）、巴氏量表（Barthel Index, BI）、簡短式智能評估（Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE）。心理計量分析包括內部一致性信度、內容效度、建構效度、同時效標關聯效度、預測效度與區辨效度，採用的統計方法有相關、迴歸、兩獨立樣本t檢定、驗證性因素分析等。結果：WHOQOL-OLD問卷之內部一致性係數介於0.71~0.86。問卷題目與自己所屬的向度之相關（r= 0.62~0.88）都高於跟其他向度之相關。驗證性因素分析（confirmatory factor analysis）大略支持WHOQOL-OLD為兩階層因素之理論模型。WHOQOL-OLD六個層面跟多個同時效標之相關雖然幾乎都達到0.01的顯著水準，但部分相關仍不如預期假設的強。在預測數個整體生活品質指標方面（除WHOQOL-BREF的整體自評題G1、G2外），WHOWQOL-OLD六個層面的解釋力約達到四成，而且是一個可接受的外加模組。最後，WHOQOL-OLD可區別健康與較不健康的老人。結論：研究結果支持WHOQOL-OLD台灣版問卷有良好的信、效度，可以使用在如同本研究樣本較為健康的台灣六十歲以上的社區老人。

以文找文

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the WHOQOL-OLD-Taiwan version. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. First, we translated this questionnaire by following standard procedure. After a pilot study, we collected data from 438 seniors over 60 years of age from communities in greater Taipei and Chiayi from June to October, 2012. In addition to filling out the WHOQOL-OLD, the participants also completed the WHOQOL-BREF, Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination as the criterion variables. We examined the following psychometric properties: internal consistency reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity, predictive validity, and discriminant validity by using correlation analysis, regression analysis, two independent group t-tests, and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients were between 0.71~0.86. The correlation coefficients between each item (r=0.62~0.88) and the facet of belonging were higher than those with other facets. Confirmatory factor analysis generally supported the idea that the WHOQOL-OLD was a second-order factor model, which indicated that six factors were subsumed under an overall “quality of life” factor. Most of the correlation coefficients between the facets of WHOQOL-OLD and several concurrent criteria were statistically significant (p < 0.01), but some correlations were not as high as expected. Except for predicting G1 and G2, the WHOQOL-OLD explained about 40% of the variation in the overall quality of life indices. This study also showed that the WHOQOL-OLD was a good add-on module. Elderly people with better and worse health conditions could be discriminated by the WHOQOL-OLD through independent group t-tests (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The WHOQOL-OLD-Taiwan version has good psychometric properties. The WHOQOL-OLD module appears to be a useful instrument for use with community-dwelling Taiwanese seniors.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	郭乃文、劉秀枝、王佩芳、徐道昌(19890100)。中文版「簡短式智能評估」(MMSE)之簡介。臨床醫學，23(1)=133，39-42。延伸查詢
2.	Liu, C. Y.、Wang, S. J.、Teng, E. L.(1997)。Depressive Disorders Among Older Residents in a Chinese Rural Community。Psychological Medicine，27(4)，943-949。
3.	廖以誠、葉宗烈、楊延光、盧豐華、張智仁、柯慧貞、駱重鳴(20040300)。臺灣老年憂鬱量表之編製與信、效度研究。臺灣精神醫學，18(1)，30-41。延伸查詢
4.	Hwang, H. F.、Lian, W. M.、Chiu, Y. N.、Lin, M. R.(2003)。Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan。Age and Ageing，32(6)，593-600。
5.	郭乃文、劉秀枝、王珮芳、廖光淦、甄瑞興、林恭平、陳祖裕、徐道昌(19881200)。「簡短式智能評估」之中文施測與常模建立。復健醫學會雜誌，16，52-59。延伸查詢
6.	World Health Organization Quality of Life Work Group(1995)。The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization。Social Science Medicine，41(10)，1403-1409。
7.	Brink, T. L.、Yesavage, J. A.、Lum, O.、Heersema, P. H.、Adey, M.、Rose, T. L.(1982)。Screening tests for geriatric depression。Clinical gerontologist，1(1)，37-43。
8.	World Health Organization(1994)。Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and Current Status。International Journal of Mental Health，23(3)，24-56。
9.	O'Connell, K.、Skevington, S.、Saxena, S.、WHOQOL HIV Group(2003)。Preliminary development of the World Health Organisation's Quality of Life HIV instrument (WHOQOL-HIV) : analysis of the pilot version。Soc Sci Med，57，1259-1275。
10.	The WHOQOL-SRPB Group(2006)。A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs as components of quality of life。Soc Sci Med，62，1486-1497。
11.	Power, M.、Quinn, K.、Schmidt, S.、WHOQOL-OLD Group(2005)。Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module。Qual Life Res，14，2197-2214。
12.	Power, M. J.、Green, A. M.、WHOQOL-Dis Group(2010)。Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module。Qual Life Res，19，571-584。
13.	Chien, C. W.、Wang, J. D.、Yao, G.、Hsieh, C. L.(2007)。Development and verification of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect。Qual Life Res，16，1375-1381。
14.	Chien, C. W.、Wang, J. D.、Yao, G.、Hsueh, I. P.、Hsieh, C. L.(2009)。Agreement between the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Chinese and Taiwanese versions in elderly people。J Formos Med Assoc，108，164-169。
15.	Liu, R.、Wu, S.、Hao, Y.(2013)。The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrumentolder adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation。Health Qual Life Outcomes，11，156。
16.	Ceremnych, J.(2003)。Focus group discussion with older adults and carers for development of pilot WHOQOLOLD measure。Acta Med Litu，10，152-158。
17.	Chachamovich, E.、Fleck, M. P.、Trentini, C.、Power, M.(2008)。Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD module version: a Rasch analysis of a new instrument。Rev Saude Publica，42，308-316。
18.	Eser, E.、Eser, S.、Ozyurt, B. C.、Fidaner, C.(2005)。Perception of quality of life by a sample of Turkish older adults: WHOQOL-OLD project Turkish focus group results。Turk Geriatri Derg，8，169-183。
19.	Eser, E.、Eser, S.(2012)。The WHOQOL-OLD module: psychometric properties of the Turkish national data pool。Qual Life Res，21，24。
20.	Fleck, M. P.、Chachamovich, E.、Trentini, C.(2006)。Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module。Rev Saude Publica，40，785-791。
21.	Halvorsrud, L.、Kalfoss, M.、Diseth, A.(2008)。Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD。Scand J Caring Sci，22，292-305。
22.	Hawthorne, G.、Davidson, N.、Quinn, K.(2006)。Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international procotol designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults。Qual Life Res，15，1257-1270。
23.	Lucas, R.、Monteserín, R.、Juncà, S.(2003)。Quality of life and socio-demographic characteristics of older adults (the WHOQOL-OLD project)。Qual Life Res，12，851。
24.	Peel, N. M.、Bartlett, H.(2007)。Measuring quality of life in older people: reliability and validity of WHOQOLOLD。Australas J Ageing，26，162-167。
25.	Gobbens, R. J.、van Assen, M. A.(2016)。Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD。Health Qual Life Outcomes，14，103。
26.	Vilar, M.、Sousa, L. B.、Simoes, M. R.(2016)。The European Portuguese WHOQOL-OLD module and the new facet Family/Family life: reliability and validity studies。Qual Life Res，25，2367-2372。
27.	Van Biljon, L.、Nel, P.、Roos, V.(2015)。A partial validation of the WHOQOL-OLD in a sample of older people in South Africa。Glob Health Action，8，28209。
28.	Conrad, I.、Matschinger, H.、Riedel-Heller, S.、von Gottberg, C.、Kilian, R.(2014)。The psychometric properties of the German version of the WHOQOL-OLD in the German population aged 60 and older。Health Qual Life Outcomes，12，105。
29.	Leplege A.、Perret-Guillaume, C.、Ecosse, E.、Hervy, M. P.、Ankri, J.、von Steinbüchel, N.(2013)。A new instrument to measure quality of life in older people: the French version of the WHOQOL-OLD。Rev Med Interne，34，78-84。
30.	Kullmann, L.、Troznai, T.、Varju, C.(2007)。Assessment of the quality of life of elderly people in Hungary by the WHOQOL-OLD instrument; psychometric properties。Int J Rehab，30，99。
31.	Yao, G.、Chung, C. W.、Yu, C. F.、Wang, J. D.(2002)。Development and verification of reliability and validity of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version。J Formos Med Assoc，101，342-351。
32.	Mahoney, F. I.、Barthel, D. W.(1965)。Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index。Maryland State Medical Journal，14，61-65。
33.	McHorney, C. A.、Ware, J. E. Jr、Lu, J. F.、Sherbourne, C. D.(1994)。The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) : III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups。Med Care，32，40-66。
34.	Chang, Y. C.、Yao, G.、Hu, S. C.、Wang, J. D.(2015)。Depression affects the scores of all facets of the WHOQOLBREF and may mediate the effects of physical disability among community-dwelling older adults。PLoS One，10，e0128356。
35.	Power, M.(2003)。Development of a common instrument for quality of Life。EUROHIS: Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys，57，145-163。
36.	Schmidt, S.、Mühlan, H.、Power, M.(2006)。EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study。Eur J Public Health，16，420-428。
37.	da Rocha, N. S.、Power, M. J.、Bushnell, D. M.、Fleck, M. P.(2012)。The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOLBREF。Value Health，15，449-457。
38.	Fang, J.、Power, M.、Lin, Y.、Zhang, J.、Hao, Y.、Chatterji, S.(2012)。Development of short versions for the WHOQOLOLD module。Gerontologist，52，66-78。
39.	Caballero, F. F.、Miret, M.、Power, M.(2013)。Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE。Health Qual Life Outcomes，11，1770-1186。
40.	Sheikh, J. I.、Yesavage, J. A.(1986)。Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent findings and development of a shorter version。Clinical Gerontologist，5(2)，165-173。
41.	Folstein, Marshal F.、Folstein, Susan E.、McHugh, Paul R.(1975)。"Mini-mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician。Journal of Psychiatric Research，12(3)，189-198。

學位論文
1.	謝博瑜(2016)。世界衛生組織生活品質問卷應用於台灣老年人之心理計量研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，台北。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	姚開屏、台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2004)。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北：國立台灣大學心理系。延伸查詢
2.	姚開屏、台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2004)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北：國立台灣大學心理系。延伸查詢
3.	World Health Organization(1995)。Resources for new WHOQOL centers。Geneva：World Health Organization。

其他
1.	WHO。WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment，http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf?ua=1。
2.	WHO。WHOQOL-OLD: manual，http://www.diakonova.no/neted/services/file/?hash=a17f4bcd06910c546670c6fbdee0cb0f。
3.	(2015)。World population ageing 2015，http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf。
4.	WHO。The wisdom year: aging into the 21th century，http://wisdom.unu.edu/en/ageingsocieties/。

圖書論文
1.	Sartorius, N.、Kuyken, W.(1994)。Translation of health status instruments。Quality of life assessment: International perspectives。Spring-Verlag。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	在地老化實踐、外在連續性與都市老人生活品質研究：以臺北市為例
2.	老人生活品質與健康因素探討--以光復鄉為例
3.	「憶」起幸福：社區失智長者現實導向無錯誤學習團體之成效
4.	機構照護新思維--臺灣長照機構推動生活自立支援對能力回復與生活品質之成效探討
5.	醫院門診長者友善環境之探討--指標之建構
6.	閩客社區懷舊處遇團體不同成效探討：以臺中市社區為例
7.	社區老人社會支持與憂鬱相關之研究
8.	Depression in Older Residents With Stroke Living in Long-Term Care Facilities
9.	高齡友善城市與老人幸福感：指標、發現與建議
10.	臺灣簡易七題版口腔健康衝擊量表(OHIP-7T)之發展與驗證
11.	南投縣日間照顧中心老人生活品質影響因素之研究
12.	參與社區關懷據點之長者身體活動與生活品質關係之探討
13.	護理之家老年住民失落感之概念分析
14.	阻力訓練對於安養機構高齡者跌倒預防之效益與執行建議
15.	規律運動對臺灣高齡喪偶婦女適應歷程效益之初探

1.	建成環境與高齡者身體活動及憂鬱症狀之關聯研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	唾液與尿液中安非他命及甲基安非他命等量閾值之評估
2.	資源型區域可持續發展能力測度研究
3.	國家發展與原住民族的健康不均等--以太魯閣族肝病為例
4.	大學校院體育教師運用資訊科技融入教學之每週教學時數分析
5.	客製化糖尿病藥事照護服務提升病人健康識能與疾病預後
6.	細胞治療法規鬆綁或更嚴厲管制？--評論臺灣2017年「細胞及基因治療產品管理法草案」
7.	細胞治療研發到產品：法律問題與管理制度研究
8.	寓教於祭的倫理教育劇場--儒家祭祀禮典儀式中展開的典範學習活動析論
9.	以色列的生存之道--現實主義者的觀點
10.	亦敵亦友：二十世紀初期汕頭臺灣商人與日本殖民者、潮汕商人的合作和競爭
11.	全民健康保險停保、復保制度檢討--法律與政策觀點
12.	Technical Efficiency of National Production under Heterogeneous Technologies: A Latent Class Stochastic Frontier Approach
13.	混合實境兒童智慧圖書館之建置
14.	學生健康體適能與空氣懸浮微粒之空間關聯分析：以臺灣地區生態相關研究為例
15.	防災社區自主性評估之探討

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫