:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民意支持死刑的態度可改變嗎?
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:周愫嫻 引用關係
作者(外文):Jou, Sus-yan
出版日期:2017
卷期:46:2
頁次:頁553-588
主題關鍵詞:死刑民意死刑替代方案衝突價值Death penaltyPublic opinionAlternative to death penaltyValue conflict
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:67
臺灣是一個嚴刑重罰的社會嗎?這種嚴刑重罰是否近年愈發強烈?2014 年的中研院與廢死聯盟的民意調查報告結果,似乎支持這個結論,因為支持死刑的比例高達82%。然而,這種態度不可改變嗎?本文以2014 年中研院與臺灣廢死聯盟收集的民意調查資料分析顯示,至少三種因素可以改變人們反對廢死的態度:第一,提供死刑相關知識與訊息,第二,提供各種不同的替代死刑的方案,第三,找到一群心中具有多重與死刑相關衝突價值觀的民眾,因為他們最容易因為環境與條件的改變而轉變心意。至於改變的比例,第一種比較有限,約5%民眾會因增加訊息,改而支持廢死;第二種非常有效,約47%民眾會因有替代方案,改而支持廢死,尤其終身監禁不得假釋,且需工作賠償被害人的替代方案,更能使得63%民眾改而支持廢死;第三種則更為有效,因為人們對於死刑存廢的看法,經常處於矛盾價值選擇中。大部分的人在選擇對死刑應否廢除時,也常「三心二意」或心意未決,譬如:又支持個人主義,也支持集體主義;同時關心冤案,也擔心縱放;有高被害恐懼,又覺得社區很安全;既認為刑罰應該有矯治效果,也認為要有嚇阻與應報功能。本研究發現心中愈認知到這些矛盾價值的民眾,可改變性愈高。
Is Taiwan a punitive society? Or Taiwan has become more and more towards punitive? A survey conducted by Academia Sinica and the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty in 2014 showed that 82% of the public supported the death penalty in Taiwan. It seems to support that Taiwan is indeed a punitive society. However, the research question raised by this study is whether or not the strong public support on death penalty can be changed. This present study analyzed the same 2014 survey data and found that it is possible to change the public opinion on death penalty. There are at least three methods to do so. First, 5% of the public would change their attitudes to support abolishment if more information/knowledge is provided. Second, 47% of the public would change their attitudes to support abolishment if alternative punishments are offered. The most effective alternative punishment preferred is the life sentence without parole plus prison work to compensate the victims (63% ). Last, most of the public have an ambiguous attitude to death penalty, for example, they support both individualism and collectivism, concern with both innocent cases and criminals found not-guilty in courts, have higher fear of crime but feel safe in the community, and perceived both rehabilitation and deterrence/retribution as the purposes of punishment. Nevertheless, these people who face the most value conflicts are most likely to change their originally positive attitudes of death penalty to abolishment. This study has demonstrated that the public opinion on death penalty are not as firm or unchangble as the government or society claims.
期刊論文
1.侯崇文(19971200)。治亂世用重典社會意向之研究。犯罪學期刊,3,43-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.顏厥安(20110100)。毒藥與十字架。思想,17,151-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sprott, J. B.、Doob, A. N.(1997)。Fear, victimization, and attitudes to sentencing, the courts, and the police。The Canadian Journal of Criminology,39(3),275-291。  new window
4.Taylor, D. G.、Scheppele, K. L.、Stinchcombe, A. L.(1979)。Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions。Social Problems,26(4),413-424。  new window
5.Bauman, Z.(2000)。Social issues of law and order。The British Journal of Criminology,40(2),205-221。  new window
6.Brewer, M. B.、Chen, Y.-R.(2007)。Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism。Psychological Review,114(1),133-151。  new window
7.Bakken, B.(2011)。China, a punitive society?。Asian Criminology,6(1),33-50。  new window
8.謝靜琪(20081200)。死刑意向性別差異之初探。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,11,23-50。  延伸查詢new window
9.Craig, S. C.、Kane, J. G.、Martinez, M. D.(2002)。Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't: citizens' ambivalence about abortion。Political Psychology,23(2),285-301。  new window
10.Craig, S. C.、Martinez, M. D.、Kane, J. G.、Gainous, J.(2005)。Core values, value conflict, and citizens' ambivalence about gay rights。Political Research Quarterly,58(1),5-17。  new window
11.Newby-Clark, I. R.、McGregor, I.、Zanna, M. P.(2002)。Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?。Journal of personality and social psychology,82(2),157-166。  new window
12.McCord, D.(1998)。Imagining a retributivist alternative to capital punishment。Florida Law Review,50(1),1-143。  new window
13.Zaller, J.、Feldman, S.(1992)。A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences。American journal of political science,36(3),579-616。  new window
14.Tyler, T. R.、Boeckmann, R. J.(1997)。Three strikes and you are out but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers。Law & Society Review,31(2),237-265。  new window
15.許家馨(20140900)。應報即復仇?--當代應報理論及其對死刑之意涵初探。中研院法學期刊,15,207-282。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Johnson, D. T.、Zimring, F. E.(2009)。The next frontier: National development, political change, and the death penalty in Asia。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.台灣廢除死刑推動聯盟(2014)。死刑民意與價值初步報告。臺北:台灣廢除死刑推動聯盟。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hollway, W.、Jefferson, T.(1997)。Doing narrative research differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method。London, England:Sage。  new window
4.Lester, D.(1998)。The death penalty: issues and answers。Springfield, IL:Clarles C. Thomas。  new window
5.Sato, M.、Johnson, D.、Tagusari, M.、Lehrfreund, S.、Jabbar, P.(2013)。The death penalty in Japan: a report on Japan's legal obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and an assessment of public attitudes to capital punishment。London, England:The Death Penalty Project。  new window
6.Rothman, D. J.(1971)。The discovery of the asylum: social order and disorder in the New Republic。Boston, MA:Little, Brown & Company。  new window
7.Garland, David(2001)。The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Zimring, Franklin E.、Hawkins, Gordon、Kamin, Sam(2001)。Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.陳澤憲(2011)。為什麼取消13項死刑罪名,http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showNews.aspx?id=26012。  延伸查詢new window
2.法務部(2013)。2009年修復式司法試行方案,http://www.moj.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=33533&CtUnit=10810&BaseDSD=7&mp=001。  new window
3.Manting(2014)。死刑不能拿來譴責殺勠,它本身就是殺戮,http://www.thinkingtaiwan.com/content/2014。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bakken, B.(2013)。Capital punishment reform, public opinion, and penal elitism in the People's Republic of China。Confronting capital punishment in Asia: human rights, politics, and public opinion。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Converse, P. E.(1970)。Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue。The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems。Boston, MA:Addison and Wesley。  new window
3.Braithwaite, J.(2011)。In search of restorative Jurisprudence。Why punish? how much? a reader on punishment。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Hegel, G. W. F.(2011)。Wrong。Why punish? how much? A reader on punishment。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Gross, S. R.、Holtz, R.、Miller, N.(1995)。Attitude certainty。Attitude strength: antecedents and consequences。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.Maruna, S.、King, A.(2008)。Public opinion and community penalties。Crime and crime policy (Vol 3): fear of crime--pinitivity new development in theory and research。Bochum:Universitatsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer。  new window
7.Kant, I.(2011)。The penal law and the law of pardon。Why punish? how much? a reader on punishment。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Hough, M.、Park, A.(1996)。How malleable are attitudes to crime and punishment? Findings from a British deliberative poll。Changing attitudes to punishment。London, England:Willan。  new window
9.Zimring, F. E.(2013)。State execution: is Asia different and why?。Confronting capital punishemnt in Asia: human rights, politics, and public opinion。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Tonry, M.(2011)。Introduction: thinking about punishment。Why punish? how much? a reader on punishment。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE